Curt Doolittle

Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • Yes one needs a ‘threat’ (stick) if one fails to negotiate a reciprocal position

    Yes one needs a ‘threat’ (stick) if one fails to negotiate a reciprocal position. That’s a stick. I question whether publishing it but… we can add or remove it if necessary.

    As for ‘whiteness’
    Well, it’s a science thing.
    ‘Whiteness’ is just science.

    Natural, Common, Concurrent, Constitution and Law is just science.

    The fact that Europeans stumbled on the only sequence of institutions that would produce truth before face, and democracy, reason, then empiricism and science is an accident of history.

    But it’s not a question of supremacy, or superiority of the people, just that the group strategy and history is in fact superior because it deviates least from the laws of the universe.

    I don’t make the rules (laws) of the universe. I just observe and record them.

    But then, knowing the rules, I don’t think it’s unethical or immoral to prevent people from abusing them by attempting to rule you by alternate rules.

    In fact, if you disagree, you won’t be able to do it without demonstrating you’re unethical, immoral, or evil. 😉

    Cheers

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 22:29:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635770220085116932

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635741043739054081

  • Yes one needs a ‘threat’ (stick) if one fails to negotiate a reciprocal position

    Yes one needs a ‘threat’ (stick) if one fails to negotiate a reciprocal position. That’s a stick. I question whether publishing it but… we can add or remove it if necessary.

    As for ‘whiteness’
    Well, it’s a science thing.
    ‘Whiteness’ is just science.

    Natural, Common, Concurrent, Constitution and Law is just science.

    The fact that Europeans stumbled on the only sequence of institutions that would produce truth before face, and democracy, reason, then empiricism and science is an accident of history.

    But it’s not a question of supremacy, or superiority of the people, just that the group strategy and history is in fact superior because it deviates least from the laws of the universe.

    I don’t make the rules (laws) of the universe. I just observe and record them.

    But then, knowing the rules, I don’t think it’s unethical or immoral to prevent people from abusing them by attempting to rule you by alternate rules.

    In fact, if you disagree, you won’t be able to do it without demonstrating you’re unethical, immoral, or evil. 😉

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @SFrinlan @ConceptualJames

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 22:29:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635770219959316481

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635741043739054081

  • Have Some P-Law Fun With This One? 😉

    Have Some P-Law Fun With This One? 😉 https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1635435683513769985

  • What rules? The universe, particles, elements, geology, biology, our genes, our

    What rules? The universe, particles, elements, geology, biology, our genes, our morphology make the rules. They’re called laws of nature. Of which that set we call natural law consists of the laws of cooperation that mirror the physical laws. If you had studied say physics or economics you’d understand entropy, equilibration, reciprocity, and full accounting, and grasp that anything you DON”T do means someone else ends up doing it. We call that externalization. Or more specifically: privatizing commons, and socializing losses into the commons. Or more correctly: moral crime.

    Reply addressees: @KiwiBreeder

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 20:09:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635372656747769885

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635371112363327489

  • What rules? The universe, particles, elements, geology, biology, our genes, our

    What rules? The universe, particles, elements, geology, biology, our genes, our morphology make the rules. They’re called laws of nature. Of which that set we call natural law consists of the laws of cooperation that mirror the physical laws. If you had studied say physics or economics you’d understand entropy, equilibration, reciprocity, and full accounting, and grasp that anything you DON”T do means someone else ends up doing it. We call that externalization. Or more specifically: privatizing commons, and socializing losses into the commons. Or more correctly: moral crime.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 20:09:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635372656877793288

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635371112363327489

  • Sorry Meredith; I don’t make the rules. I just look at incentives and consequenc

    Sorry Meredith;
    I don’t make the rules.
    I just look at incentives and consequences.
    The question is whether you contribute to commons.
    You call it thinkingn for yourselves, but what you mean is thinking selfishly and empathically and not systematically. Men do the opposite. We evovled these cognitive differences before we developed language and reason. And we have those brains and bodies.
    It doesn’t matter if you think you’re right, or if your instincts and intuitions feel right, if the consequences of doing so are a matter of human survival.
    All female instincts and intuitions without the responsibility of children, appear to result in hyperconsumption and hyperselfishness and evasion of responsiblity for the commons, at the cost of society and polity, and population necessary for civilization.
    Men can live comfortably on almost nothing. We built civilization to attract and maintain women so that we could obtain sex, affection, and care (and status).
    Women are checking out of marriage and childrearing, and men are checking out of society economy and politics and the result is playing out as we’d expect it would.
    Sorry, but for all intents and purposes we’ve produced mass sterilization.
    And the economy of redistribution depends on that not happening. Look at japan and south korea now, and china tomorrow, and germany thereafter.
    You aren’t ‘thinking’
    You’re just feeling.

    Reply addressees: @KiwiBreeder

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 18:53:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635353369018527745

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635347435072679936

  • Sorry Meredith; I don’t make the rules. I just look at incentives and consequenc

    Sorry Meredith;
    I don’t make the rules.
    I just look at incentives and consequences.
    The question is whether you contribute to commons.
    You call it thinkingn for yourselves, but what you mean is thinking selfishly and empathically and not systematically. Men do the opposite. We evovled these cognitive differences before we developed language and reason. And we have those brains and bodies.
    It doesn’t matter if you think you’re right, or if your instincts and intuitions feel right, if the consequences of doing so are a matter of human survival.
    All female instincts and intuitions without the responsibility of children, appear to result in hyperconsumption and hyperselfishness and evasion of responsiblity for the commons, at the cost of society and polity, and population necessary for civilization.
    Men can live comfortably on almost nothing. We built civilization to attract and maintain women so that we could obtain sex, affection, and care (and status).
    Women are checking out of marriage and childrearing, and men are checking out of society economy and politics and the result is playing out as we’d expect it would.
    Sorry, but for all intents and purposes we’ve produced mass sterilization.
    And the economy of redistribution depends on that not happening. Look at japan and south korea now, and china tomorrow, and germany thereafter.
    You aren’t ‘thinking’
    You’re just feeling.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-13 18:53:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635353369165307904

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635347435072679936

  • RT @StephenThomasHC: @curtdoolittle @BillCor26578964 @eranAbamie In other words

    RT @StephenThomasHC: @curtdoolittle @BillCor26578964 @eranAbamie In other words

    Against human nature = doomed
    Against Natural Law = doomed…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-12 18:50:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634990158058778625

  • Well, I think globalism is just fine. I think telling people democracy is a good

    Well, I think globalism is just fine. I think telling people democracy is a good, rather than the rule of law by the natural law of self-determination, sovereignty, and reciprocity is good, and that, democracy might maybe result as a luxury once we succeed at it.
    Rule of Law=responsibility.
    Liberalism like socialism and communism is just irresponsibility.
    The whole problem of modernity is maximizing individual responsibility.
    And that requires eliminating personal as well as public ‘corruption’.

    Reply addressees: @BillCor26578964 @eranAbamie

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-12 17:15:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634966469443190786

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634965735410917377

  • Well, I think globalism is just fine. I think telling people democracy is a good

    Well, I think globalism is just fine. I think telling people democracy is a good, rather than the rule of law by the natural law of self-determination, sovereignty, and reciprocity is good, and that, democracy might maybe result as a luxury once we succeed at it.
    Rule of Law=responsibility.
    Liberalism like socialism and communism is just irresponsibility.
    The whole problem of modernity is maximizing individual responsibility.
    And that requires eliminating personal as well as public ‘corruption’.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-12 17:15:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634966469531320329

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634965735410917377