Yes one needs a ‘threat’ (stick) if one fails to negotiate a reciprocal position

Yes one needs a ‘threat’ (stick) if one fails to negotiate a reciprocal position. That’s a stick. I question whether publishing it but… we can add or remove it if necessary.

As for ‘whiteness’
Well, it’s a science thing.
‘Whiteness’ is just science.

Natural, Common, Concurrent, Constitution and Law is just science.

The fact that Europeans stumbled on the only sequence of institutions that would produce truth before face, and democracy, reason, then empiricism and science is an accident of history.

But it’s not a question of supremacy, or superiority of the people, just that the group strategy and history is in fact superior because it deviates least from the laws of the universe.

I don’t make the rules (laws) of the universe. I just observe and record them.

But then, knowing the rules, I don’t think it’s unethical or immoral to prevent people from abusing them by attempting to rule you by alternate rules.

In fact, if you disagree, you won’t be able to do it without demonstrating you’re unethical, immoral, or evil. 😉

Cheers

Reply addressees: @SFrinlan @ConceptualJames