Category: Natural Law and Reciprocity

  • THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW 1) RECIPROCITY in self-de

    THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW
    1) RECIPROCITY in self-determination by self determined means is the natural law of non-conflict (cooperation).
    2) IMPROVEMENT by capital investment, by the people in the territory, by domestication, infrastructure, institutions, and monuments, determines who has ‘rights’ (priority) to the territory.
    3) The superiority of SMALL HOMOGENOUS ethnocentric states, because of the trust, velocity of cooperation, low power distance, and absence of conflict, that in turn promotes investment in commons that in turn reduce the cost for all, limiting the need for individual and family income.
    4) The superiority of RULE OF LAW BY THE NATURAL LAW, the sovereignty of that natural law, and an independent court, regardless of the form of government that operates under that law, from monarchy, to ideology, to bureaucracy, to republic to democracy. Natural Law matters not government. It suppresses private and public corruption by creating a market for prosecution of irreciprocity.
    4) Only FEDERATIONS – and not empires – can produce defense for small homogenous states, and maintain natural (necessary) rights. All existing hostilities are attempts to override the natural law of self determination by self determined means.
    5) GOVERNMENTS HAVE NO RIGHTS and cannot have rights, only people can. Governments can only act to produce and preserve natural rights – else they are not governments but organized crime.
    6) The NATURAL PROGRESSION OF MAN is like all life, toward a large number of small homogeneous ethnocentric states, operating under natural law, creating a market for polities to accomodate our differences, and trading meritocratically with one another, all defended by federations, producing a market for innovation adaptation and evolution, that transcends man into the gods we imagine we might yet be – and perhaps better than those we have yet imagined.

    -FIN-


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 21:15:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639374722738552833

  • THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW 1) RECIPROCITY in self-de

    THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW
    1) RECIPROCITY in self-determination by self determined means is the natural law of non-conflict (cooperation).
    2) IMPROVEMENT by capital investment, by the peoplem in the territory, by domestication, infrastructure, institutions, and monuments, determines who has ‘rights’ to the territory.
    3) The superiority of SMALL HOMOGENOUS ethnocentric states, because of the trust, velocity of cooperation, low power distance, and absence of conflict, that in turn promotes investment in commons that in turn reduce the cost for all, limiting the need for individual and family income.
    4) The superiority of RULE OF LAW BY THE NATURAL LAW, the sovereignty of that natural law, and an independent court, regardless of the form of government that operates under that law, from monarchy, to ideology, to bureaucracy, to republic to democracy. Natural Law matters not government. It suppresses private and public corruption by creating a market for prosecution of irreciprocity.
    4) Only FEDERATIONS – and not empires – can produce defense for small homogenous states, and maintain natural (necessary) rights. All existing hostilities are attempts to override the natural law of self determination by self determined means.
    5) GOVERNMENTS HAVE NO RIGHTS and cannot have rights, only people can. Governments can only act to produce and preserve natural rights – else they are not governments but organized crime.
    6) The NATURAL PROGRESSION OF MAN is like all life, toward a large number of small homogeneous ethnocentric states, operating under natural law, creating a market for polities to accomodate our differences, and trading meritocratically with one another, all defended by federations, producing a market for innovation adaptation and evolution, that transcends man into the gods we imagine we might yet be – and perhaps better than those we have yet imagined.

    -FIN-


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 21:15:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639371443610742787

  • I would have to understand you with more clarity. As the good (decreases in risk

    I would have to understand you with more clarity. As the good (decreases in risk and stress by increases in capital, income, and choices) vs the reciprocal means of getting there, vs the truth of the reciprocal means of getting there, and whether or not we’re fully accounting for…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-23 16:55:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638947521853530123

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638946197900791808

  • Yes. Evasion of responsibility – largely for the regulation of others by defense

    Yes. Evasion of responsibility – largely for the regulation of others by defense of the commons.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 17:44:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638597565322067989

    Reply addressees: @WalterIII @enigma3078

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638590491070722050

  • THE UNIVERSE AND MAN IN A NUTSHELL “A universally commensurable, value neutral,

    THE UNIVERSE AND MAN IN A NUTSHELL
    “A universally commensurable, value neutral, paradigm, vocabulary, and grammar of ethics, morality, and politics” results in a formal logic of cooperation (returns on time), and as such a formal logic of law (conflict resolution), and formal logic of politics (commons), and formal logic of economics (scale).

    Now, you wouldn’t think all this was possible, but it turns out that there is just one fundamental law to the universe (evolutionary computation), and a tiny set of derivations of (applications of) that law, as we scale the complexity of the universe from the quantum background to matter, to life, to cooperation(ternary logic), to the words we speak and ideas we produce.

    And as such we can measure variation from that law – that ‘optimum’ minimum variation from the laws of the universe, and maximum exploitation of those laws of the universe, by discovering new means of evolutionary computation wjether by matter biology, cooperation, or ideas. Because there is only one means of improving man’s condition while under continous evolution, and that’s the capture and transformation of energy per capita.

    P-Method, P-Logic, P-Law an the Legal,Constitutional, and Policy Reforms, necessary for our continued evolution – and prevention of another dark age.

    It’s a lot of work. As much as any other STEM degree.
    However, it is the unification of the sciences: physical, behavioral, evolutionary, and formal.

    But it is also the most demanding of our psychology and emotions – because we prefer to cheat mother nature whenever possible. And in doing so violate the laws of nature we call ‘cooperation’.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 13:48:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638538077063847936

  • THE UNIVERSE AND MAN IN A NUTSHELL “A universally commensurable, value neutral,

    THE UNIVERSE AND MAN IN A NUTSHELL
    “A universally commensurable, value neutral, paradigm, vocabulary, and grammar of ethics, morality, and politics” results in a formal logic of cooperation (returns on time), and as such a formal logic of law (conflict resolution), and formal logic of politics (commons), and formal logic of economics (scale).

    Now, you wouldn’t think all this was possible, but it turns out that there is just one fundamental law to the universe (evolutionary computation), and a tiny set of derivations of (applications of) that law, as we scale the complexity of the universe from the quantum background to matter, to life, to cooperation(ternary logic), to the words we speak and ideas we produce.

    And as such we can measure variation from that law – that ‘optimum’ minimum variation from the laws of the universe, and maximum exploitation of those laws of the universe, by discovering new means of evolutionary computation wjether by matter biology, cooperation, or ideas. Because there is only one means of improving man’s condition while under continous evolution, and that’s the capture and transformation of energy per capita.

    P-Method, P-Logic, P-Law an the Legal,Constitutional, and Policy Reforms, necessary for our continued evolution – and prevention of another dark age.

    It’s a lot of work. As much as any other STEM degree.
    However, it is the unification of the sciences: physical, behavioral, evolutionary, and formal.

    But it is also the most demanding of our psychology and emotions – because we prefer to cheat mother nature whenever possible. And in doing so violate the laws of nature we call ‘cooperation’.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 13:48:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638538077197983747

  • Again. Reciprocity. It’s the first principle of ethics. Give what you get. If yo

    Again. Reciprocity. It’s the first principle of ethics. Give what you get. If you studied say the prisoner’s dilemma or Axelrod’s work and those of his followers you might begin to grasp it. Or if you had some knowledge of comparative law. But… nope. ;).


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-17 02:25:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636554376922685440

    Reply addressees: @MaybeAnnatar @cyberlich420 @iamzheanna

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636552711947649026

  • If you know the directions, you can follow them dear. I have a simple rule. Reci

    If you know the directions, you can follow them dear.

    I have a simple rule.
    Reciprocity. 😉
    Give what you get.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-17 00:59:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636532647450083328

    Reply addressees: @mootsheep @iamzheanna

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636532095291129856

  • It’s OK dear. If you don’t comprehend something, you can just say so. Laws of na

    It’s OK dear. If you don’t comprehend something, you can just say so.
    Laws of nature (Physical laws) > Natural Laws (Laws of cooperation) > Evolutionary Laws > Logical laws (to describe physical cooperative evolutionary laws).

    It’s OK if you don’t know such things.
    You usually…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-17 00:54:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636531345429086208

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636479430012043264

  • Again. I don’t feel. I’m not a woman. My objection is logical: reciprocity. I do

    Again. I don’t feel. I’m not a woman. My objection is logical: reciprocity.

    I don’t care about you.
    I don’t care to convince you.
    I only care about giving people who want explanations.

    Why would I invest time and effort in you?


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-14 22:39:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635772658167021569

    Reply addressees: @peaches_rhi @anniegread @Gridlad2 @FrailSkeleton

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1635735985991585792