RT @LukeWeinhagen: Natural Law, law derived from first principles (natural states), preserves the connection between man’s behavior and nat…
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-28 22:11:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640839074998104068
That’s exactly what guns are for.
Justified.
Without question.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 19:50:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640441304566972417
Reply addressees: @AZ_TeeTime
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640391301354131456
IRONY
I have one objective: maximization of human cooperation for the benefit of all. That means races, ethnicities, classes, sexes, and ages. This is possible under rule of law by the natural common concurrent law. But if we can’t truthfully discuss human differences, then we can’t satisfy differences in human wants and needs. So by lying that differences don’t exist, we generate conflict, that can only be resolved by authority that is the antithesis of each end of the spectrum.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 19:21:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640433763871080449
IRONY
I have one objective: maximization of human cooperation for the benefit of all. That means races, ethnicities, classes, sexes, and ages. This is possible under rule of law by the natural common concurrent law. But if we can’t truthfully discuss human differences, then we can’t satisfy differences in human wants and needs. So by lying that differences don’t exist, we generate conflict, that can only be resolved by authority that is the antithesis of each end of the spectrum.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 19:21:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640433763787194369
So for self ownership to exist, we have to insure one another’s self-ownership (legal: ‘sovereignty’). To insure one another’s sovereignty, we have to agree on what we insure, and the terms of insurance. Reciprocity is the only possible means, but we would have to agree on the terms of reciprocity. To form a polity of sovereignty and reciprocity we have to insure ENOUGH that a polity can form, produce, survive, compete. And we have to suppress that which prohibits a polity for forming, producing, surviving, and competing.
So what does that look like?
Reply addressees: @IanISSawesome @BobMurphyEcon
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 01:29:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640164212235198465
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640162403110232071
So for self ownership to exist, we have to insure one another’s self-ownership (legal: ‘sovereignty’). To insure one another’s sovereignty, we have to agree on what we insure, and the terms of insurance. Reciprocity is the only possible means, but we would have to agree on the terms of reciprocity. To form a polity of sovereignty and reciprocity we have to insure ENOUGH that a polity can form, produce, survive, compete. And we have to suppress that which prohibits a polity for forming, producing, surviving, and competing.
So what does that look like?
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 01:29:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640164212327546880
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640162403110232071
Exactly. Reciprocity is such a lovely ethic. Isn’t it?
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 01:18:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640161310594744322
Reply addressees: @AxeOfWashington @MeatRespecter @BobMurphyEcon
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640159976604794880
RT @WalterIII: P law advocacy could use a simplified term for the concept of “stacking motivations” because, for instance, when the common…
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 18:44:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640062131788808195
THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW
1) RECIPROCITY in self-determination by self determined means is the natural law of non-conflict (cooperation).
2) IMPROVEMENT by capital investment, by the people in the territory, by domestication, infrastructure, institutions, and monuments, determines who has ‘rights’ (priority) to the territory.
3) The superiority of SMALL HOMOGENOUS ethnocentric states, because of the trust, velocity of cooperation, low power distance, and absence of conflict, that in turn promotes investment in commons that in turn reduce the cost for all, limiting the need for individual and family income.
4) The superiority of RULE OF LAW BY THE NATURAL LAW, the sovereignty of that natural law, and an independent court, regardless of the form of government that operates under that law, from monarchy, to ideology, to bureaucracy, to republic to democracy. Natural Law matters not government. It suppresses private and public corruption by creating a market for prosecution of irreciprocity.
4) Only FEDERATIONS – and not empires – can produce defense for small homogenous states, and maintain natural (necessary) rights. All existing hostilities are attempts to override the natural law of self determination by self determined means – mostly be the remaining agrarian empires that have failed to transition to rule of law: at least Russia, Iran, and China. Or those states with artificial borders created during colonial period, that haven’t yet converted (peacefully) to ethnostates.
5) GOVERNMENTS HAVE NO RIGHTS and cannot have rights, only people can. Governments can only act to produce and preserve natural rights – else they are not governments but organized crime.
6) The NATURAL PROGRESSION OF MAN, as with all life, is toward a large number of small homogeneous ethnocentric states, operating under natural law, creating a market for polities to accomodate our differences, and trading meritocratically with one another, all defended by federations, producing a market for innovation adaptation and evolution, that peacefully and prosperously transcends man into the gods we imagine we might yet be – and perhaps better than those we have yet imagined.
-FIN-
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 21:15:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639375521535467532
THE RULES OF DECIDABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL NATURAL LAW
1) RECIPROCITY in self-determination by self determined means is the natural law of non-conflict (cooperation).
2) IMPROVEMENT by capital investment, by the people in the territory, by domestication, infrastructure, institutions, and monuments, determines who has ‘rights’ (priority) to the territory.
3) The superiority of SMALL HOMOGENOUS ethnocentric states, because of the trust, velocity of cooperation, low power distance, and absence of conflict, that in turn promotes investment in commons that in turn reduce the cost for all, limiting the need for individual and family income.
4) The superiority of RULE OF LAW BY THE NATURAL LAW, the sovereignty of that natural law, and an independent court, regardless of the form of government that operates under that law, from monarchy, to ideology, to bureaucracy, to republic to democracy. Natural Law matters not government. It suppresses private and public corruption by creating a market for prosecution of irreciprocity.
4) Only FEDERATIONS – and not empires – can produce defense for small homogenous states, and maintain natural (necessary) rights. All existing hostilities are attempts to override the natural law of self determination by self determined means – mostly be the remaining agrarian empires that have failed to transition to rule of law: at least Russia, Iran, and China. Or those states with artificial borders created during colonial period, that haven’t yet converted (peacefully) to ethnostates.
5) GOVERNMENTS HAVE NO RIGHTS and cannot have rights, only people can. Governments can only act to produce and preserve natural rights – else they are not governments but organized crime.
6) The NATURAL PROGRESSION OF MAN, as with all life, is toward a large number of small homogeneous ethnocentric states, operating under natural law, creating a market for polities to accomodate our differences, and trading meritocratically with one another, all defended by federations, producing a market for innovation adaptation and evolution, that peacefully and prosperously transcends man into the gods we imagine we might yet be – and perhaps better than those we have yet imagined.
-FIN-
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-24 21:15:57 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1639375521388589057