THE PROBLEM IS THE NOTION OF ‘PHILOSOPHER’
Priests beg with comforting lies.
Philosophers sell with appealing lies.
Jurists(Scientists) TELL with Decidability whether you like it or not.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 20:16:00 UTC
Category: Epistemology and Method
-
THE PROBLEM IS THE NOTION OF ‘PHILOSOPHER’ Priests beg with comforting lies. Phi
-
Should this be a triangle with “The Law -> choice -> preference -> calories” Tha
Should this be a triangle with
“The Law -> choice -> preference -> calories”
That would give us something like:
Truths
……..\
……..Decidable — >Goods?
……../
Deceits
Sort of like… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=518028758794019&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 19:30:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200497323043934210
-
It’s not like I set out to do it. I set out to create a value neutral language o
It’s not like I set out to do it. I set out to create a value neutral language of ethics and politics. Once I understood the conflict between hayek and mises I literally stumbled on the consequences. It’s just true. It is what it is.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 19:03:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200490563520356352
Reply addressees: @KillerkattArt @ArturBooth @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200489171749609473
IN REPLY TO:
@KillerkattArt
@curtdoolittle @ArturBooth @DegenRolf Good luck with that.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200489171749609473
-
LAW REPLACED PHILOSOPHY Nature consists of constant relations. We can describe t
LAW REPLACED PHILOSOPHY
Nature consists of constant relations. We can describe those constant relations. Math is the language of positional relations, logic of set relations, and operations… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=518011422129086&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 19:01:22 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200489950308896769
-
THE TRUTH ISN’T DESIRABLE IT’S JUST TRUE (DECIDABLE) Nature consists of constant
THE TRUTH ISN’T DESIRABLE IT’S JUST TRUE (DECIDABLE)
Nature consists of constant relations. We can describe those constant relations. Math is the language of positional relations, logic of… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=518010325462529&id=100017606988153
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 18:59:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200489448808599560
-
So, I mean, I sense your frustration, but Aristotle started the project, Descart
So, I mean, I sense your frustration, but Aristotle started the project, Descartes and the British restored it, Darwin advanced it, and I’m completing it: the scientific method is complete. And it’s completed because we have that method for ALL disciplines now, not just physical.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 18:55:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200488353554190336
Reply addressees: @KillerkattArt @ArturBooth @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200487011121061890
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@KillerkattArt @ArturBooth @DegenRolf (I didn’t miss the point)
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1200487011121061890
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@KillerkattArt @ArturBooth @DegenRolf (I didn’t miss the point)
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1200487011121061890
-
Nature consists of constant relations.We can describe those constant relations.M
Nature consists of constant relations.We can describe those constant relations.Math is the language of positional relations, logic of set relations, and operations of humanly possible subjectively testable actions. Law consists in the test of the MOST constant relations possible.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 18:46:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200486223434932230
Reply addressees: @KillerkattArt @ArturBooth @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200485544381300736
IN REPLY TO:
@KillerkattArt
@curtdoolittle @ArturBooth @DegenRolf Way to miss the point: laws are generated by humans, not nature, and especially the closer they deal with more than one abstract means of expression. If your forte is law, then your own theory ought to render your profession as redundant and useless.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200485544381300736
-
The problem for any person making any such argument is that once something is de
The problem for any person making any such argument is that once something is decidable (scientific) you are stuck with making an excuse (lie) for why not to rely on decidability.
Net result: The only solution is separation.
We are wealthy enough to separate.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 18:00:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200474539118993409
Reply addressees: @KillerkattArt @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200471531836657664
IN REPLY TO:
@KillerkattArt
@curtdoolittle @DegenRolf I don’t think you’ve said anything controversial either, it’s just reheated essentialism as defined by the self proclaimed elite. You might use special language to organize evidence, but the end product seems like just another subjective take.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200471531836657664
-
HERE. I”LL MAKE IT WORSE Art can EASILY be evaluated by triangulation (ordinal),
HERE. I”LL MAKE IT WORSE
Art can EASILY be evaluated by triangulation (ordinal), as can all things not reducible to linear (cardinal) measures. Anything humans value can be evaluated by triangulation.
Most of the time, in art, we are measuring ignorance, as in any other field.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 17:26:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200466115144630272
Reply addressees: @KillerkattArt @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200465449252773888
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@KillerkattArt @DegenRolf HERE IS THE PROBLEM FOR THE ARTIST
The artist cannot necessarily control his intuitions – the elephant is stronger than the rider, and the elephant gets stronger the lower the individual’s agency (class). But he produces a good in a market, like any other, he can be liable for.Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1200465449252773888
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@KillerkattArt @DegenRolf HERE IS THE PROBLEM FOR THE ARTIST
The artist cannot necessarily control his intuitions – the elephant is stronger than the rider, and the elephant gets stronger the lower the individual’s agency (class). But he produces a good in a market, like any other, he can be liable for.Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1200465449252773888
-
innovation, like violence, knowledge or speaking, tells us nothing without purpo
innovation, like violence, knowledge or speaking, tells us nothing without purpose and consequence. Cancer innovates, viruses innovate, criminals innovate, liars innovate, marxists, postmodernists, and feminists innovate, but that tells us nothing about additive or subtractive.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 16:51:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200457153544364033
Reply addressees: @KillerkattArt @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200444184282443777
IN REPLY TO:
@KillerkattArt
@curtdoolittle @DegenRolf I would think basic art history would illustrate the point. Isn’t the modern promotion of art precisely based on the notion that it is innovative and avant-garde? Therefore, isn’t the postmodern perspective that you think “lies” something which falls out as a consequence?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200444184282443777