PLS NOTE: I use this argument: that names (language) are systems of measurement (comparison), and that without the system of measurement we are far less likely to disambiguate boundaries and surfaces, from objects and USEFUL objects. We recognize the world by utility. https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1201456047820607489
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-04 14:17:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1202230343086092288
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/78716433_521698348427060_8402282321171972096_o_521698345093727.jpg (Increasing Parsimony)(Increasing Parsimony)
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-04 13:01:00 UTC
So you want to debate the normative definition of the term, the scientific, and the definition I use when I use it as I define it? What are you debating?
Tell me a behavior you want to eliminate and explain how it isnt the result of neoteny and the resulting agency.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-04 04:59:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1202090110285684737
Reply addressees: @PowerNihilism
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1202077486051405824
IN REPLY TO:
@PowerNihilism
@curtdoolittle Domestication: the process of taming an animal & keeping it as a pet or on a farm & the cultivation of a plant for food.
Auto domestication: the process of turning humans into docile easily controlled pets.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1202077486051405824
Mistake = Inconsequential to the outcome.
Error = consequential to the outcome.
Twitter = where idiots pretend empty verbalisms in 200 characters can disambiguate and test and argument.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-03 16:35:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1201902717477765125
Reply addressees: @Leekshooter @KSSS @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1201901295021568000
IN REPLY TO:
@Leekshooter
@KSSS @curtdoolittle @JohnMarkSays But I thought he never makes mistakes ever?
Maybe he might like the selfish gene that was an alright book
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1201901295021568000
Please don’t confuse my poetic with analytic. Whether I’m speaking Analytically or Poetically, either is pretty damned obvious – because my analytic prose will make your brain bleed. So when I use poetic prose please grant me poetic license in exchange for the brevity. š
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-02 13:50:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1201498907416702976
Reply addressees: @moondoggie__
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1201429878584860672
IN REPLY TO:
@moondoggie__
@curtdoolittle Even if Iām technically only half, would raising my hand as an example be a type of performative contradiction? Kind of a catch 22
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1201429878584860672
I vacillate between separating GSRRM, Pilpul, and Critique and incorporating GSRRM into Critique. Should probably be: False Promise -> Bait into Hazard -> Pilpul (lying)
-> Critique(straw manning) -> GSRRM(denying) -> Claim of Plausible Deniability(evasion) -> Track-Covering
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-02 03:37:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1201344537903415296
Yes. BTW: I vacillate between separating GSRRM, Pilpul, and Critique and incorporating GSRRM into Critique. Should probably be:
False Promise -> Bait into Hazard -> Pilpul (lying)
-> Critique(straw manning) -> GSRRM(denying) -> Claim of Plausible Deniability(evasion)
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-02 03:35:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1201344138827968512
Reply addressees: @realDougMemphis
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1201340807564922880
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable ā we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1201340807564922880
They why do you keep re-engaging?
All art can be judged by a) craft(materials), b) design (aesthetics), and c) content (meaning), and (d) all works judged by triangulation. etc.
I never Err. Ever.
(see Screenshot from my course.) https://t.co/ByyoRXd27n
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-01 18:58:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1201214063252037633
Reply addressees: @KillerkattArt @maialmrn @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1201198186255323141
IN REPLY TO:
@KillerkattArt
@curtdoolittle @maialmrn @DegenRolf Silly, not offensive.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1201198186255323141
Define truth.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-01 14:22:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1201144441555292161
Reply addressees: @ArturBooth @maialmrn @KillerkattArt @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1201126400100589568
IN REPLY TO:
@ArturBooth
@curtdoolittle @maialmrn @KillerkattArt @DegenRolf I disagree that’s “only communication”. I think art is the highest human achievement possible, even more than science, and it contains the highest possible truth. There has to be more to life than laws and lies.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1201126400100589568
We all make mistakes (invariance in conclusion) but some of us make few if any errors (variance in conclusion).
I realize you are offended, but that is the price of learning – the reorganization of presumptions in which you have made investments – particularly self image.
Source date (UTC): 2019-12-01 14:21:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1201144338497060864
Reply addressees: @KillerkattArt @maialmrn @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1201128752576684034
IN REPLY TO:
@KillerkattArt
@curtdoolittle @maialmrn @DegenRolf Imagine such self deception, that in such overblown hot air, one boasts that they make no errors.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1201128752576684034