innovation, like violence, knowledge or speaking, tells us nothing without purpose and consequence. Cancer innovates, viruses innovate, criminals innovate, liars innovate, marxists, postmodernists, and feminists innovate, but that tells us nothing about additive or subtractive.
Source date (UTC): 2019-11-29 16:51:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200457153544364033
Reply addressees: @KillerkattArt @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200444184282443777
IN REPLY TO:
@KillerkattArt
@curtdoolittle @DegenRolf I would think basic art history would illustrate the point. Isn’t the modern promotion of art precisely based on the notion that it is innovative and avant-garde? Therefore, isn’t the postmodern perspective that you think “lies” something which falls out as a consequence?
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1200444184282443777
Leave a Reply