KANT IS NO LONGER CONFOUNDED
— ‘What is law?’ may be said to be about as embarrassing to the jurist as the well-know question ‘What is Truth?’ is to the logician.”—Immanuel Kant
Except with Propertarianism, and Testimonialism, we can answer both those questions ‘perfectly’.
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-03 19:06:00 UTC
THE INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION OF CRIMINAL, UNETHICAL, AND IMMORAL CONDUCT BY THE SUPPRESSION OF CRIMINAL, UNETHICAL, AND IMMORAL INFORMATION.
We defend life (murder)
We defend the body (harm)
We defend property (theft and harm)
We defend kin (genes)
We defend allies and nighbors (relations)
We defend interests (private shares, public commons)
We defend institutions (norms and formal institutions)
We defend the territory (air, sea, land, resources, nature)
We defend the market (involuntary warranty of goods, and services – and now INFORMATION)
The west has been defeated in the ancient past by lies (supernatural monotheism)
The west has almost been defeated in the modern era by lies (jewish pseudoscience, and puritan pseudorationalism)
The first defeat was achieved through a near monopoly on writing and preaching.
We rescued ourselves by the invention of the printing press and literacy.
The second near defeat was achieved through a near monopoly on MEDIA.
We are rescuing ourselves through the new literacy: the internet.
There is no reason we do not demand in information, the same warranty of due diligence against HAZARD that we demand from GOODS and SERVICES.
We do not ask the liar, the thief, and the immoral propagandist for permission to prosecute them, to kill, punish, deprive, and silence them. We threaten punishment and we demand restitution.
My position is that it is quite possible to create an online reporting system for people who create hazards, collect data about them for later prosecution, use violence to obtain power to expand the common law to include warranty of due diligence on public speech, and then prosecute, judge and kill, punish, deprive, or silence those people so that just as we have eliminated violence, theft, fraud, and conspiracy from the market for goods and services, that we eliminate creations of criminal, unethical, immoral, and conspiratorial information from the market as well.
If we kill enough of the people for advocating ‘voluntarism’ – an excuse to ignore externalities and hazards – then people will refrain from advocating ‘voluntarism’ and the export of externalities and hazards.
It’s not that we shouldn’t use violence.
It’s that don’t do enough of it.
Hence: incremental suppression.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-03 13:37:00 UTC
—“People use two business plans. One is bottom-up, groping for truth. Second is top-down, with Pipers calling tunes. They intersect to form a series of momentary consensuses.”—Peter St Onge
(edited)
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-03 09:17:00 UTC
The academy and many of its professors confuse GOOD and TRUE information wit easily produced marketed, distributed information. #NewRight
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-03 02:50:49 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804880542592278528
150 years of pseudoscience.If we can require warranty of performance of goods and services,why not education and information?
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-03 02:44:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804879002905309184
Reply addressees: @charlesmurray
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801580876148543488
IN REPLY TO:
@charlesmurray
Anthropology’s search for scientific truth marches on, impartial and unafraid. https://t.co/QQLAWySPDB https://t.co/W97YTvSCVF
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/801580876148543488
The academy and many of its professors confuse GOOD and TRUE information wit easily produced marketed, distributed information. #NewRight
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-02 21:50:00 UTC
Said the brave Horatio,
to the Captain at the Gate;
How can man die better,
than facing fearful odds,
for the Ashes of his Fathers,
and the Temples of his Gods?
Demand for Truth in word,
is our generation’s fight.
To end their wage of lies,
To restore our gods,
and save our kin.
From a graveyard paradise.
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-01 14:15:00 UTC
THE GREAT TRANSFORMATION: THE PEOPLE WORKING ON ENDING THE CENTURY OF ‘PSEUDOSCIENCE’, ‘PSEUDORATIONALISM’, ‘PSEUDO-LEGISLATION’, AND ‘LYING’ :
– ?? Gaad Saad (psychology/falsehood) ??
– Jordan Peterson (psychology/falsehood/stoicism)(not happy to be on this list I assume)
– Stephen Hicks (ethics) (who I doubt likes being in this list)
– Jonathan Haidt (morality)(also doubt likes being on this list)
– Curt Doolittle (law, testimony, and epistemology)
– Nassim Taleb (fragility, innumeracy, pseudoscience) (first mover)
– Kevin Macdonald (group evolutionary theory-jewish)(first mover)
– Ricardo Duchesne (group evolutionary strategy -western)
Now, I think i’ve painted the whole picture because I choose to work only with incentives (operations) but everyone is contributing to it in his own frame of reference. Together we are revising the world.
We are seeing the following changes:
(a) the transition from theory to operationalism. (profound)
(b) the end of the competitive luxury of universalism. (expected)
(c) the end of the era of cosmopolitan pseudoscience.
(d) the end of the puritan (anglo) enlightenment fallacy.
(e) the completion of the western european program (truth).
(f) the reconstruction of what we used to call ‘stoicism’. (surprising)
(g) the end of the academy (surprising)
Dr Jordan B Peterson, Professor of Psychology might not understand he is reconstructing stoicism in scientific rather than original terms. He may. He may not.
I was not aware that I was reconstructing the stoic intuition of natural law.
Popper was not aware that his program was incomplete – overly simplistic.
Hayek understood he had discovered that like physics, the model for the social sciences is best explained by information (changes instate) rather than electromagnetism, physical force, or the will of the gods.
There is a reason science was a byproduct of western LAW. The logic of the law consists of MORE DIMENSIONS than it’s predecessors EMPIRICISM, RATIONALISM, LOGIC, and MATHEMATICS.
We all SENSE this in one way or another. And together we are approaching the completion of the western program: TRUTH, after 2500 years, and multiple failures.
But like our ancestors we sensed something in the distance. And step by step we are about to cross the threshold of a very different future – one as different as empiricism from rationalism, rationalism from reason, and reason from mysticism, and mysticism from anthropomorphism
And I am certain the returns on the OPERATIONAL (existential) era of truth, over the era of empirical truth, will be as great as the returns on empirical truth over mysticism and rationalism.
Curt Doolittle
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-01 11:21:00 UTC
I don’t care what names people call me.Darwin, Newton,Galileo, Aristotle, and Socrates had worse. But True=True.
Source date (UTC): 2016-12-01 01:40:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804137958118932480
Reply addressees: @grimsithe @jeffreyatucker
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804116030335369216
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/804116030335369216
PROPERTARIANISM AND THE IS-OUGHT DIVIDE
(worth repeating)
Source date (UTC): 2016-11-30 09:02:00 UTC