THE INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION OF CRIMINAL, UNETHICAL, AND IMMORAL CONDUCT BY THE S

THE INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION OF CRIMINAL, UNETHICAL, AND IMMORAL CONDUCT BY THE SUPPRESSION OF CRIMINAL, UNETHICAL, AND IMMORAL INFORMATION.

We defend life (murder)

We defend the body (harm)

We defend property (theft and harm)

We defend kin (genes)

We defend allies and nighbors (relations)

We defend interests (private shares, public commons)

We defend institutions (norms and formal institutions)

We defend the territory (air, sea, land, resources, nature)

We defend the market (involuntary warranty of goods, and services – and now INFORMATION)

The west has been defeated in the ancient past by lies (supernatural monotheism)

The west has almost been defeated in the modern era by lies (jewish pseudoscience, and puritan pseudorationalism)

The first defeat was achieved through a near monopoly on writing and preaching.

We rescued ourselves by the invention of the printing press and literacy.

The second near defeat was achieved through a near monopoly on MEDIA.

We are rescuing ourselves through the new literacy: the internet.

There is no reason we do not demand in information, the same warranty of due diligence against HAZARD that we demand from GOODS and SERVICES.

We do not ask the liar, the thief, and the immoral propagandist for permission to prosecute them, to kill, punish, deprive, and silence them. We threaten punishment and we demand restitution.

My position is that it is quite possible to create an online reporting system for people who create hazards, collect data about them for later prosecution, use violence to obtain power to expand the common law to include warranty of due diligence on public speech, and then prosecute, judge and kill, punish, deprive, or silence those people so that just as we have eliminated violence, theft, fraud, and conspiracy from the market for goods and services, that we eliminate creations of criminal, unethical, immoral, and conspiratorial information from the market as well.

If we kill enough of the people for advocating ‘voluntarism’ – an excuse to ignore externalities and hazards – then people will refrain from advocating ‘voluntarism’ and the export of externalities and hazards.

It’s not that we shouldn’t use violence.

It’s that don’t do enough of it.

Hence: incremental suppression.

Curt Doolittle

The Propertarian Institute

Kiev, Ukraine.