Theme: Truth

  • FUNDAMENTALIST NATURAL LAW (important piece) If many promote fundamentalist isla

    FUNDAMENTALIST NATURAL LAW

    (important piece)

    If many promote fundamentalist islam, fundamentalist marxism, fundamentalist judaism, fundamentalist christianity, fundamentalist political correctness, surely there is room for fundamentalist NATURAL LAW?

    I suppose it wouldn’t occur to people that we could treat Physical Law, Natural Law, and Testimonial Law (truth) as the word of the gods? And that we need no ‘prophet’. We’ve been slowly discovering the word of god as written in the universe, the record of man’s behavior, and the means of speaking god’s language of truth, for thousands of years. (so what has everyone else been doing?)

    I suppose it wouldn’t occur to people that if expansionary fundamentalist islam, like expansionary fundamentalist marxism before it, like expansionary fundamentalist christianity, like expansionary fundamentalist equalitarian social democracy, can be imposed by idea, propaganda, rebellion, terrorism, and seizure of the academy, of the media, and of the state, then another minority could rely on Truth instead of mysticism, pseudo-rationalism, pseudoscience, and outright lying to evolve from idea, propaganda, rebellion, terrorism, and seizure of the academy, of the media, and of the state. It’s been done before by violence. It can just as easily if not more easily be done again.

    I suppose it wouldn’t occur to people that if zealots, soldiers, lawyers, judges, propagandists, politicians, and imperial bureaucracies can impose rule over societies using other forms of fundamentalism, why we can’t also use the same range of personnel to impose Fundamentalist Natural Law.

    I suppose it wouldn’t occur to people that just as each prior era was unimaginable and unpredictable to all but a few.

    Revolutions require tinder to burn.

    And the centuries of lies have left deadfall everywhere.

    We need only light the match.

    It starts with one act, by one man.

    then two acts by two men.

    Then twenty acts by one hundred men.

    Then a hundred acts by ten thousand men

    Then on transformation by one million men.

    The future belongs to those who take it.

    There is no place in history for the weak.

    There is no substitute for action.

    And there is no equal to violence.

    There is but one word of god: Truth.

    There is but one rule of god: Natural Law.

    All those who disobey the rule of god,

    Deny man transcendence into gods.

    Every lie blocks the way to godhood.

    Every liar piles blocks in our way.

    Every institution of lies creates a fortress in our way.

    Purge the lies

    Purge the liars

    Purge the fortresses of lies.

    —————————

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-05 10:09:00 UTC

  • “Be careful what you ask for …”,”‘Be careful what you threaten..”, “Be careful

    “Be careful what you ask for …”,”‘Be careful what you threaten..”, “Be careful how you argue … lest others do so in return”.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-05 00:50:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/805575135130480641

    Reply addressees: @JonHaidt

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/805387492144926724


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/805387492144926724

  • THE ONLY NECESSARY RESPONSE TO ALL NON-ARGUMENT BY EMOTION Being offended isn’t

    THE ONLY NECESSARY RESPONSE TO ALL NON-ARGUMENT BY EMOTION

    Being offended isn’t an argument. It is a confession that you resort to animal instinct instead of human reason; or that you incapable of thinking; or that you do not know how to think; that you do not choose to think; or that you seek to resort to self deception by avoiding thinking; or that you actively seek to deceive others by disapproval, shaming and rallying. So are you animal, stupid, ignorant, incompetent, lazy, dishonest, or a liar?

    ( Molyneux needed a little Propertarian expansion. 😉 )


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-04 17:08:00 UTC

  • Retweeted Stefan Molyneux (@StefanMolyneux): Being offended isn’t an argument. I

    Retweeted Stefan Molyneux (@StefanMolyneux):

    Being offended isn’t an argument. It is a confession that you are ruled by emotion. It is a confession that you do not know how to think.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-04 14:00:00 UTC

  • Q&A: “CURT, WHAT IS A GOOD SOURCE OF NEWS???” —“Can you recommend a good sourc

    Q&A: “CURT, WHAT IS A GOOD SOURCE OF NEWS???”

    —“Can you recommend a good source of news? I mostly read the Economist; neoliberal assumptions aside it’s weighty and thorough.”— Trent Fowler

    Interesting question that I can answer on multiple levels.

    1) Every source of news is ‘good’ if you know what they’re lying about (their bias).

    When I hear news, I don’t take it on face value as a statement of honest moral intent, but I take every single news item i read as a lie of some sort, if for no other reason than it’s stated with sufficient confidence to get your opinion: ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, pseodorationalism, pseudoscience and deceit.

    So all news is good news if you realize its all lies and you’re looking for possible half-truth candidates by combining enough stories across enough outlets that you can figure out the rational intentions of the people who are being reported upon.

    2) I tend to read this web site every single day: www.rtable.net/index/rt/economics/recent/ Understanding that professors in the academy are always biased toward globalism and think the academy is a good thing instead of the problem.

    I read stratfor, understanding that it’s got a neocon bias.

    I tend to read the Forbes blogs.

    I read the WSJ

    I read pretty much any new paper that’s mentioned on SSRN.

    I let other people SELECT news for me (I follow people on twitter)

    3) But here is the trick. You get to the point where you have enough information, that really, you are rarely learning anything new. Because man isn’t new. Man’s thousands of years old. And all that happens over time is that we make things cheaper, and our speech gets more complex. But otherwise we’re the same as we were when we built the first villages and cities.

    I think news cannot be understood unless history is understood. So I would read my suggested reading list before I would worry about the news. News is just gossip.

    History and science will be the NEWS to you, until you run out of news when reading history and science.

    And you will run out of news once you see it’s just a long history of repetitions of cycles.

    And that’s the most profound thing I can tell you.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-04 13:47:00 UTC

  • 0/4 The reason our ancestors couldn’t eliminate beliefs was because they failed

    0/4 The reason our ancestors couldn’t eliminate beliefs was because they failed to define both Truth and Law in scientific terms #NewRight


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-04 00:34:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/805208569901674497

  • Most ideology and so called ‘philosophy’ is just moral fantasy literature if poo

    Most ideology and so called ‘philosophy’ is just moral fantasy literature if poorly written short form. #NewRight


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-04 00:27:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/805206797514588160

  • 0/4 The reason our ancestors couldn’t eliminate beliefs was because they failed

    0/4 The reason our ancestors couldn’t eliminate beliefs was because they failed to define both Truth and Law in scientific terms #NewRight


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-03 19:34:00 UTC

  • If you can’t make an operational argument for the implementation of and persiste

    If you can’t make an operational argument for the implementation of and persistence of an idea then it’s not an idea its nonsense. #NewRight


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-03 19:26:00 UTC

  • THIS IS PROFOUND: LAWS OF NATURE, NATURAL LAW, AND LAWS OF INFORMATION 1) Law of

    THIS IS PROFOUND:

    LAWS OF NATURE, NATURAL LAW, AND LAWS OF INFORMATION

    1) Law of Nature (physical laws) and

    2) Natural Law (laws of cooperation), and

    3) Truth (laws of information)

    consist of a spectrum dependent upon each other.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-12-03 19:10:00 UTC