Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sovereignty

  • You Have Many Choices. We Have One. so Leave

    You Have Many Choices. We Have One. so Leave https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/14/you-have-many-choices-we-have-one-so-leave/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 15:48:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228345329868820482

  • You Have Many Choices. We Have One. so Leave

    Feb 12, 2020, 12:14 PM [I]f you want socialism, and open borders, then leave – open borders work both ways. And you have a whole world offering socialism that is willing to take you. Canada alone wants 100M people in this century and there are as many as 100M of you that want Canadian Socialism. But If you want western civilization, and in particular anglo American high trust institutions, and the proceeds from them, then there is only one country left to get them. And we are going to keep it that country and those institutions, no matter what the cost – including no matter what cost to you – including the greatest cost.

  • You Have Many Choices. We Have One. so Leave

    Feb 12, 2020, 12:14 PM [I]f you want socialism, and open borders, then leave – open borders work both ways. And you have a whole world offering socialism that is willing to take you. Canada alone wants 100M people in this century and there are as many as 100M of you that want Canadian Socialism. But If you want western civilization, and in particular anglo American high trust institutions, and the proceeds from them, then there is only one country left to get them. And we are going to keep it that country and those institutions, no matter what the cost – including no matter what cost to you – including the greatest cost.

  • Sovereignty (Natural Law) vs Submission (Theology)

    Sovereignty (Natural Law) vs Submission (Theology) https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/14/sovereignty-natural-law-vs-submission-theology/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 15:24:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1228339330004983812

  • Sovereignty (Natural Law) vs Submission (Theology)

    —“…The concept of “obeying the commandments gives ultimate freedom” was the biggest oxymoron to me for most of my life. I have my merits, it should be good enough… Maybe this is just my inner /r, I have found a level of peace as I accepted my place in the machinery of life.”—Anne Summers

    [I]t gives people an easy way of avoiding conflict over status and position so that they can work in harmony by simple rules. We just use sovereignty in western civ (scientific and legal) and take accountability for our actions, and supernaturalists use an excuse NOT to take accountability for their actions. In other words, sovereignty for the strong, and submission for the weak.

  • Sovereignty (Natural Law) vs Submission (Theology)

    —“…The concept of “obeying the commandments gives ultimate freedom” was the biggest oxymoron to me for most of my life. I have my merits, it should be good enough… Maybe this is just my inner /r, I have found a level of peace as I accepted my place in the machinery of life.”—Anne Summers

    [I]t gives people an easy way of avoiding conflict over status and position so that they can work in harmony by simple rules. We just use sovereignty in western civ (scientific and legal) and take accountability for our actions, and supernaturalists use an excuse NOT to take accountability for their actions. In other words, sovereignty for the strong, and submission for the weak.

  • What’s the difference between Roosevelt stacking the supreme court, and Hart-Cel

    What’s the difference between Roosevelt stacking the supreme court, and Hart-Cellar stacking the Electorate? None.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 11:01:00 UTC

  • TALKING YOU OUT OF LIBERTARIANISM by Brandon Hayes —“I’ve frankly been leaning

    TALKING YOU OUT OF LIBERTARIANISM

    by Brandon Hayes

    —“I’ve frankly been leaning towards Libertarianism…Talk me out of it?”—Connie

    Good morning Connie, talk you out of Libertarianism you say… 🙂

    Perhaps we can just go to the root of it.

    The libertarians don’t have a plan for your protection. They rely on the NAP; which relies on people being relatively advanced (moral); people aren’t. So, you’d be relying on the same mechanisms of power and protection that we have now. Meaning the power distance remains large and chances of miscarriage of justice remains high.

    The only way to ensure a sovereign nation (a libertarian nation even) is through a militia of sovereign men. P is the only political group looking to decrease power distance and increase robustness of fellow its men; we insist every man is a sheriff (part of the militia, a craftsman, a father, etc)[resiliency, ownership, and mastery].

    See, it’s not so much that you ought be thinking “I’d like to be a libertarian” (be able to live freely without others imposing cost and have everyone obey the NAP [they won’t]) BUT, it’s more that you should be thinking “I want MY MEN to be Propertarians”; otherwise the choice to live a life free from imposition of cost (like a libertarian believes she ought) ceases to exist.

    {hope that helps; I can answer questions}

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 09:47:00 UTC

  • SOVEREIGNTY (NATURAL LAW) VS SUBMISSION (THEOLOGY) —“…The concept of “obeyin

    SOVEREIGNTY (NATURAL LAW) VS SUBMISSION (THEOLOGY)

    —“…The concept of “obeying the commandments gives ultimate freedom” was the biggest oxymoron to me for most of my life. I have my merits, it should be good enough… Maybe this is just my inner /r, I have found a level of peace as I accepted my place in the machinery of life.”—Anne Summers

    It gives people an easy way of avoiding conflict over status and position so that they can work in harmony by simple rules.

    We just use sovereignty in western civ (scientific and legal) and take accountability for our actions, and supernaturalists use an excuse NOT to take accountability for their actions.

    In other words, sovereignty for the strong, and submission for the weak.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-14 09:44:00 UTC

  • GRACEFUL FAILURE AND KINGS 😉 —“I Never would I have considered monarchy as a

    GRACEFUL FAILURE AND KINGS 😉

    —“I Never would I have considered monarchy as a viable option then here comes Curt with his intellectual wizardry. Via negativa king with an armed populous to keep him in his lane should he go Caligula on us.”—Tyson Bay

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 14:20:00 UTC