Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sovereignty

  • We are debating right now whether to add the technical content to the mainstream

    We are debating right now whether to add the technical content to the mainstream content, because at present we have three different works (volumes). Sovereignty (reform libertarianism). The Law (the technical). And the Prosecution (the constitution).

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-09 22:36:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226635943177859073

    Reply addressees: @Austro_Punk

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226617714661380097

    IN REPLY TO:

    @Austro_Punk

    @curtdoolittle I heard a while back you were writing a magnum opus on important matters like these. Where is it? I’d be interested in reading it rather than tweets.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226617714661380097

  • THE STATE The state is the only de-facto sovereign (organization) in competition

    THE STATE

    The state is the only de-facto sovereign (organization) in competition with other polities for territory, resources, trade routes, built capital, and population.

    The state maintains that sovereignty as an insurer of last resort, maintaining a monopoly of violence in its capacity of insurer of last resort. It obtains income to pay for its function as an insurer of last resort, through fees sufficient to provide insurance against all competitors.

    The state adds value by suppression of all competitors to it’s fees, using the judicial system – thereby freeing the population from many high friction transaction costs in exchange for one low friction transaction cost (taxes). This is why states are always wealthier than non states – economic velocity.

    The government produces commons in addition to the states in order to generate the returns from commons – organizing the production of non-consumables prohibiting privatization by consumption ‘abusus’, but by allowing “usus” (use), creating ‘fructus’ (fruits).

    The production of commons increases population, trade, and therefore revenues that can be distributed between the production of common when times are fair(good), and functioning as insurer of last resort when times are dear (hard).

    Since the cost of both sovereignty and commons is only determined by market competition, then we have no say about the construction of state, military, judiciary, government, and institutions. We have only say in how competitive we desire to be and the relative conditions we live under.

    To produce a relatively anarchic polity would require only the production of sufficient military capability to deny all competitors, and retaining population and production necessary to pay for it, with the commons necessary to retain that population.

    In other words you don’t get to choose very much if you want to survive as a polity.

    The only means of minimizing a government long term is to do what I’ve recommended, which is exhaustive application of the law of reciprocity limiting allr ents, and then a payment (tax) system that was as closests to operating a business as possible. And that would require, exactly what I’ve proposed.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-09 13:32:00 UTC

  • They want proximity to us but they dont want our rule. Well, great, we don’t wan

    They want proximity to us but they dont want our rule. Well, great, we don’t want to rule them, but we won’t tolerate their rule either.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 19:46:00 UTC

  • It is disadvantageous for you to presume you undrestand the strategic condition

    It is disadvantageous for you to presume you undrestand the strategic condition or the balance of power.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 17:29:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225834019385946112

    Reply addressees: @trythison4sighs @StanGalerius

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225833769069883392

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @trythison4sighs @StanGalerius Stan.
    What do they have without electricity?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1225833769069883392

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @trythison4sighs @StanGalerius Stan.
    What do they have without electricity?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1225833769069883392

  • You can’t stop lying so you can’t be the member of an ethnicity whose entire ide

    You can’t stop lying so you can’t be the member of an ethnicity whose entire identity is predicated on sovereignty reciprocity truth, duty, and loyalty. Your ancestors stole our genes. And your present and past relations demanded stolen goods returned. So return our stolen genes.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 16:43:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225822302710923264

    Reply addressees: @HSubspecies @JeldenMishou @ClownBa73413423

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225815923522752512

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225815923522752512

  • PAY PEOPLE TO ACCELERATE THE BIG SORT AT THE COST OF THE STATE, ACADEMY, FINANCE

    PAY PEOPLE TO ACCELERATE THE BIG SORT AT THE COST OF THE STATE, ACADEMY, FINANCE, ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRIES

    I (we) hold the position that (a) we should be pursuing rights to self determination, and our way of life, and that requires arms just as others require faith. (b) We are tolerant of those that conform to our traditional group strategy, and are inclusive within that limit, but that integration on a scale of other than middle and upper middle class christians (Black, Hispanic, Asian) has failed, and that we will not leave a window open for repeating the failures of the 20th.

    Our strategy evolves. My strategy at present is to push rights. Move to the center on those rights, but be intolerant regarding policy and rights, which will drive our better people to us, and cause separation on demand for commons that will happen to be those preferred by our people.

    My understanding from the historical evidence everywhere is that if we create a separate union on our terms, then the best will depart leaving the blue cities ghettos with an elite that exploits them but cannot exploit the middle, and that new cities will replace the commercial them.

    As I’ve said, by merely emptying DC as a power center, and gutting new york as a financial center, and disemboweling the media’s income stream, we will achieve our goals.

    The reason this will work is that we are going to buy off left right and center middle with the returns on redistributing all that wealth.

    So to repeat the strategy for those that aren’t on board with it, we offer a deal that is full of desirable ideas and then turn the population against the real enemy. At that point they will double down like all humans and give us moral license to us both left and right activists and ‘divide the spoils’.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 14:56:00 UTC

  • A LITTLE CONTEXT FOR WHEN I USE “MONARCHY” Rule of Law Monarchy (Strictly Constr

    A LITTLE CONTEXT FOR WHEN I USE “MONARCHY”

    Rule of Law Monarchy (Strictly Constructed Natural Law)

    Constitutional Monarchy (Traditional Articulated Rights law)

    Christian Monarch (Church Sanctioned Customary Law)

    King ( Private Property Traditional Customary European Law )

    Imperial Tzar (Military Arbitrary Ruler – Post Mongol Russia )

    Imperial Caesar (Military Arbitrary Ruler – Pagan Europe)

    State Dictator – (Military Arbitrary Ruler)

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 12:10:00 UTC

  • “Universal suffrage will eventually cause universal suffering.”—Clifton Knox (

    —“Universal suffrage will eventually cause universal suffering.”—Clifton Knox

    (Democracy is the slow road to communism. -hoppe)

    –“I am in favor of earned cumulative meritocratic suffrage based on demonstrated generational loyalty (military, political, social, legal, intellectual/scientific, economic, artistic)), investment in the commons, level of leadership, Territorial acquisition and settlement, establishment, leadership and defense of core instituons etc.

    Patriotic American families with deep roots and demonstrated excellence over the generations in building up our country and nation will have accumulated the most voting rights (no more one man one vote). (Houses are a better solution)

    Recent immigrants whose ancestors have contributed nothing or even taken from the country by drawing down welfare or voting irreciprocally will have no franchise rights.

    Each generation is accounted for.

    This system restores power to the WASP families that founded and built America and disempowers our enemies and rivals for power. It is also just.”—Scott De Warren

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 10:07:00 UTC

  • End universal enfranchisement and we end the problem. That’s not hard to do

    End universal enfranchisement and we end the problem. That’s not hard to do.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-07 09:45:00 UTC

  • We can have the second fall of the roman empire, we can have a second civil war,

    We can have the second fall of the roman empire, we can have a second civil war, we can conquer and rule the immigrant cities, or we can devolve the federal government and separate. Now, some of us are partial to the most punishing of those choices – but compromise is easier.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-06 11:53:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1225387114596118529