Theme: Sovereignty

  • MORE ACCURATELY DESCRIBED AS SPECTRA by Luke Weinhagen I view freedom, liberty a

    MORE ACCURATELY DESCRIBED AS SPECTRA

    by Luke Weinhagen

    I view freedom, liberty and sovereignty in general as concepts more accurately described as spectra than as binaries – (https://www.facebook.com/luke.weinhagen/posts/10218951102141226) – as every individual has varying access to each of these within any of the limitless interactions we can exercise them, but I agree with the conclusion.

    We all have limits. these limits make cooperation valuable. We exceed our individual limits for freedom and liberty through cooperation with others. In doing so we insure each other’s sovereignty. Where we fail to do so we are at the mercy of, are slaves to, the forces imposing those limits.Updated Feb 21, 2020, 1:03 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 13:03:00 UTC

  • RECENT: INALIENABILITY Recent Work: Most of my offline work tries to solve inali

    RECENT: INALIENABILITY

    Recent Work: Most of my offline work tries to solve inalienability under sovereignty.

    the more I learned P the angrier I became at the postwar jewish invasion of western thought. But the more I understand our original group strategy and our law, the more complete it is and the more ELEGANT it is as an extension of the laws of nature rather than one that seeks to deceive men.

    inalienation: you cannot surrender your rights without surrendering your sovereignty and thereby defecting from and committing treason against your peers


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 12:02:00 UTC

  • You are sovereign in fact or you are not. You have liberty or freedom by permiss

    You are sovereign in fact or you are not. You have liberty or freedom by permission. If you must ask permission you are a slave.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 11:29:00 UTC

  • Revoke citizenship to 1965. Revoke benefits. Prohibit anyone with socialist or p

    Revoke citizenship to 1965. Revoke benefits. Prohibit anyone with socialist or postmodernist activities or ‘alien’ religions from residency or citizenship. charge 30% additional income taxes for non-citizens.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-21 08:16:00 UTC

  • WAR CRIME War crimes exist only under (a) Westphalian state responsibility for a

    WAR CRIME

    War crimes exist only under (a) Westphalian state responsibility for actions of all citizens and their agents – a monopoly on violence. (b) Soldiers under direction of the state.

    War crimes were necessary under state run warfare in order to i) license states’ wars of aggression, ii) with conscripted soldiers, and iii) protecting the populace from harm, iiv) while preventing escalation that will prohibit the population from tolerating cessation and settlement.

    In other words the purpose of war crimes is to facilitate the cooperation of the population with the state in the conduct of the state’s war.

    Otherwise, war is war and there are no limits on behavior, and all else is pretense and deceit.

    Islam broke the Westphalian peace with islamic terrorism

    Russia broke the postwar consensus by seizing Ukraine.

    We are in fourth generation warfare: the end of the european domestication of warfare.

    The state no longer has or can have control over the monopoly of violence.

    The non-state actors are more effective at fourth generation warfare in urban environments than are states and armor in the fields.

    TOTAL WAR

    Total war is warfare that includes any and all civilian-associated resources and infrastructure as legitimate military targets, mobilizes all of the resources of society to fight the war, and gives priority to warfare over non-combatant needs. The Oxford Living Dictionaries defines “total war” as “A war that is unrestricted in terms of the weapons used, the territory or combatants involved, or the objectives pursued, especially one in which the laws of war are disregarded.”

    Fourth-generation Warfare (Premodern Warfare)

    Fourth-generation warfare (4GW) is conflict characterized by a blurring of the lines between war and politics, combatants and civilians. The term was first used in 1980 by a team of United States analysts, including William S. Lind, to describe warfare’s return to a decentralized form. In terms of generational modern warfare, the fourth generation signifies the nation states’ loss of their near-monopoly on combat forces, returning to modes of conflict common in pre-modern times.

    The treaties of Westphalia brought to an end a calamitous period of European history which caused the deaths of approximately eight million people. Scholars have identified Westphalia as the beginning of the modern international system, based on the concept of Westphalian sovereignty, though this interpretation has been challenged.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 16:08:00 UTC

  • OUR LAW Sovereigns cannot ‘give it up to god’ – that is an act of alienation of

    OUR LAW

    Sovereigns cannot ‘give it up to god’ – that is an act of alienation of responsibility. A sovereign can neither surrender his rights or his responsibilities without breaking the contract for reciprocal insurance of sovereignty. This is why we must have stoicism in mind, and epicureanism in life. One is sovereign or not. Aristocracy requires sovereignty – the cult of non-submission. So we may need to face our permanent inequality of those who are sovereign for who responsibility is inalienable, and those who are serfs for whom responsibility is alienated by submission.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-20 12:42:00 UTC

  • THE FUTURE OF MACRO CITY STATES by Francesco Principi Love you Curt. Free cities

    THE FUTURE OF MACRO CITY STATES

    by Francesco Principi

    Love you Curt. Free cities have always represented the enemy of the tyrant state. Within a few years, world politics will be dominated by macro-cities – the influential megacities. And they are so connected to each other that they no longer have to bend to the concept of state and border. City-states are efficient on the model of the old ones: therefore not necessarily independent but with an autonomy such as to be able to engage in global relationships from which the surrounding area will benefit. I am sure this is the future.

    CD: Of course, although my understanding is that these macro states will crash with the bottom, and that the middle will escape them. So I just see a future of city-ghettos, and suburban and rural manor-states. In other words, the current wealth of cities is due to population migration made possible by financialization that was only sustainable until the end of the 20th century.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-19 12:12:00 UTC

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/85234800_210892573642237_56826014361

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/85234800_210892573642237_56826014361

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/85234800_210892573642237_5682601436119040000_o_210892566975571.jpg IN THE P-Constitution, LAW, RIGHTS, COURT PRECEDE STATE. THEY ARE NOT MUTABLE

    The propertarian constitution begins with European Natural Law of Sovereigns – a Law that is not mutable and cannot be violated. Then the constitution begins with definitions and declarations about mankind, then restates that law, then the rights that stem from it, then the court process. So, rights PRECEDE the constitution of the state and its policies. This is one of the mistakes the founders made that we are correcting.

    There is no method of altering the Natural Law, Definitions of Man, Statement of the Law, Rights, and Court. There is not really any way of modifying the organization of the state. The rest consists of policies.IN THE P-Constitution, LAW, RIGHTS, COURT PRECEDE STATE. THEY ARE NOT MUTABLE

    The propertarian constitution begins with European Natural Law of Sovereigns – a Law that is not mutable and cannot be violated. Then the constitution begins with definitions and declarations about mankind, then restates that law, then the rights that stem from it, then the court process. So, rights PRECEDE the constitution of the state and its policies. This is one of the mistakes the founders made that we are correcting.

    There is no method of altering the Natural Law, Definitions of Man, Statement of the Law, Rights, and Court. There is not really any way of modifying the organization of the state. The rest consists of policies.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-18 19:56:00 UTC

  • The Natural Law of European People in Most Reductive Form

    The Natural Law of European People in Most Reductive Form https://propertarianism.com/2020/02/17/the-natural-law-of-european-people-in-most-reductive-form/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-17 22:30:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1229533590427512833

  • The Natural Law of European People in Most Reductive Form

    (getting close to most reductive and complete form)SOVEREIGNTY REQUIRES RECIPROCITYReciprocity in Nature:  ( …cooperation and consciousness … ) Reciprocity in Deed(Actions): Due Diligence in tests of productive, fully informed[6], voluntary transfer[7] of demonstrated interests[2] within the limits of proportionality[4], free of imposition of costs upon the demonstrated interests of others by externality[8]; and warrantied, within the limits of restitutability[5]. Reciprocity in Word(Speech): Due Diligence in categorical and internal consistency within the limits of human faculties; operationally possible within the limits of human abilities, empirically correspondent within the limits of realism, naturalism and operationalism, rational within the limits of bounded rationality[1], reciprocal in rational choice, and fully accounted within stated limits. If you cannot pass those tests you cannot claim to engage in reciprocity in display, word, or deed. If you cannot engage in reciprocity you are either ignorant or ir-reciprocal. Even if you are ignorant, once informed, and continue you are ir-reciprocal. DECIDABILITY We may boycott(separate) if not a threat, cooperate(cohabitate) if we can, or prey(war) upon one another if we must. Since all irreciprocity constitutes free riding, parasitism, or predation, the only reason to let another individual or group exist, is reciprocity – all others are not only enemies, but devolutionary, and prohibiting the transcendence of man into the gods we imagined. This is the Natural Law. EUROPEAN GROUP STRATEGY: An Entrepreneurial Militia, Using Technology, Adaptability, Maneuver, and Speed Under Contractual Warfare, Oath, Duty, Loyalty Status in exchange for Heroism, Wealth, Excellence, Beauty With Differences adjudicated by Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Truth, Under Natural Law of Reciprocity, Jury, Thang or Senate, King as judge of last resort. Leaving only survival in markets for everything: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, polity, defense, and war. Causing suppression of the reproduction of the less able, and the devotion of the savings in surplus to the production of commons, and the disproportionate returns on the commons. And devoting high investment to the raising of our offspring to produce and defend the commons. (…) Transcendence of man into gods the gods we imagined. THE LAW OF OPTIMUM POLITIES A Power distribution of the Natural law(Suppression of Parasitism); A Pareto Distribution of Assets (organize voluntary production); A Nash Distribution of Rewards (Market Income); An Egalitarian Distribution of Commons (Earnings); At the cost of A Suppression of Reproduction of the Demonstrated Underclasses (Eugenics); Equal Distribution of Defense of all of the above. And Zero Tolerance for Violation of any of the above (Intolerance). EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION The history of western civilization consists of the incremental suppression of parasitism from all walks of life by use of the west’s unique, empirical, common, judge discovered natural law. Western Man domesticated himself just as he had plants and animals before. And both our aristocracy our people profited from the process. But, man was not exploited — he was domesticated from a animal to a human through generations of cultural selection pressure and aggressive culling of malcontents and free riders. OPTIMUM HUMAN ORDER There is no more coherent or successful nor possibly superior means for humans to evolve into the gods we imagine, with each generation living in the optimum conditions while doing so. ENFORCEMENT “So perhaps you don’t understand. This isn’t a negotiation. This isn’t a compromise. These are demands. We will restore our sovereignty, and leave you in peace, or we will conquer, enslave, or kill you – and all like you – until your consent is no longer required.” === Definitions:

    1. Bounded Rationality: man is not omniscient, omnipotent, or free or error, and seeks practical action in satisfaction of wants within his limits rather than optimums.

    2. Demonstrated Interest: man demonstrates continuous consumption, acquisition, preservation. Anything man demonstrates an interest in consuming, acquiring, preserving, whether by action or refraining from action, constitutes a demonstrated interest. In P law we categories demonstrated interest as Property-in-toto when referring to individuals or Capital-in-toto when referring to commons and we enumerate all categories of both under the definition of property-in-toto.

    3. Operational, Operationalism: possible to perform and speak of performing, a sequence of subjectively testable human actions. where subjectively testable means by imitating (physical), sympathizing (thinking), empathizing (feeling).

    4. Limits of Proportionality: incentive to defect given predictable future given accumulated results of reciprocal display word and deed. (Defense against systemic undermining).

    5. Restitutability: the possibility of restitution, and sufficient resources to perform restitution.

    6. Fully Informed: Reciprocal in Speech (testimony).

    7. Voluntary Transfer: loss, consumption, transfer of possession, right, or title

    8. Negative Externality: involuntary transfer against the demonstrated intersets of those not involved in the action or exchange.