Theme: Sovereignty

  • YOU HAVE MANY CHOICES. WE HAVE ONE. SO LEAVE If you want socialism, and open boa

    YOU HAVE MANY CHOICES. WE HAVE ONE. SO LEAVE

    If you want socialism, and open boarders, then leave – open borders work both ways. And you have a whole world offering socialism that is willing to take you. Canada alone wants 100M people in this century and there are as many as 100M of you that want Canadian Socialism. But If you want western civilization, and in particular anglo american high trust institutions, and the proceeds from them, then there is only one country left to get them. And we are going to keep it that country and those institutions, no matter what the cost – including no matter what cost to you – including the greatest cost.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-12 12:14:00 UTC

  • THE RIGHT TO SELF DETERMINATION We either have the right to self determination –

    THE RIGHT TO SELF DETERMINATION

    We either have the right to self determination – or we have the right to extermination. So choose. (I’m happy either way.)

    Genomes, genetic distributions, institutions, culture, traditions, norms, manners, ethics, morals, laws, history, myth, legend, monuments, territory, are all assets. Some assets are valuable. Some are not. Some are harmful. If we choose to preserve an asset, we do so.

    1) We know that moral intuition is genetic, sex biased, and that only trauma can change it – even then only slightly. We know that all traits are somewhere between 70-80% heritable and the rest is idiosyncratic accumulation rather than patterns of environment.

    2) We know that class is genetic, with lower classes accumulating more loads (defects), upper middle the fewest, and aside from noble families, the upper classes random lottery results from the middle – but otherwise there is little to no class rotation.

    3) We know that moral biases reflect female (herd, infant-equality, devotion, consumption) strategy and the male (pack, mature-hierarchy, loyalty, capitalization) instinct and that females use social superpredation by undermining, and males political superpredation by violence.

    4) We know that each of us is born with a bias in female (lateral breadth) vs male(longitudinal velocity) brain structures, and that the stereotype of male analytic and female empathic is physical construction, and that given freedom to do so we pursue interests fitting our bias.

    5) We know that at present we are wealthy enough to want to diverge by the female, empathic, equalitarian, consumptive, infantilized, and underdeveloped strategy and some by the male, analytic, hierarchical, capitalizing, and mature strategy. And so we must separate or civil war.

    6) Because while you are of the opinion that you reason, you have very little agency. And if you did, and you had knowledge, you would know that the female strategy is dysgenic, the left’s strategy is dysgenic, and standard of living is dependent on the center of the distribution.

    7) So if you want to feel harmony in suicide and bring about another dark age of ignorance, this time with social construction of the myth of possible equality, the only result of which will be dysgenia and decline – we are fine with it.

    But you can’t take the rest of us with you.

    8) Some of us are more than semi domesticated animals sensing, perceiving, feeling, experiencing intuiting, and responding to incentives to hyper consume.

    And some of us are willing to let you turn your cities into dysgenic favelas.

    Which is what we plan to let you do.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 17:34:00 UTC

  • Trump does not have congress to help with domestic organization. He has power to

    Trump does not have congress to help with domestic organization. He has power to alter trade, military, and diplomatic strategy. And with that alone he is about a third of the way to rebuilding america.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 16:15:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227264954308399106

    Reply addressees: @AMCarbonaro @realDonaldTrump @SecPompeo

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227233583695302656


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1227233583695302656

  • “WHY SHOULD YOU HAVE A VOTE?” If you have juridical defense in matters private a

    “WHY SHOULD YOU HAVE A VOTE?”

    If you have juridical defense in matters private and public, but haven’t served, aren’t financially independent and responsible for yourself, haven’t had a family that you are responsible for, don’t run a company whose employees and capital you are responsible for, or haven’t run an enterprise whose employees, capital, and patterns of trade you are responsible for, or run a state whose entire economy you are responsible for, then why do you have a vote in any of those matters without having demonstrated sufficient ability to successfully hold that responsibility?

    If you haven’t served then why do you have free speech, ownership of property?

    If you haven’t had replacement number of children, then why do you also have a vote in matters of commons?

    If you haven’t employed dozens, then why do you also have a vote in matters of the economy?

    If you haven’t employed tens of thousands, why do you have a vote in matters international?

    If you haven’t governed a state, then why do you have a vote in matters of the state?

    About 1/5-1/4 of the population is informed enough to make choices. The rest are either biased to a political party, or dependent upon filtering propaganda and opinions of friends and family. We are all capable of different levels of intellectual resolution whether by level of ability, level of interests, level of knowledge, or constitution of character.

    We do not have standing in matters public today – only private. The state deprived us of the user of courts in matters public – we had to invent class action to circumvent that deprivation.

    But If you have juridical defense, in matters BOTH private AND public – called ‘universal standing’ – then you have defense against harmed by others private and political.

    But aside from defense why should you have any opinion on anything over which you cannot demonstrate comprehension, success, and responsibility?

    All government action is limited to coercion, either by informing/lying, bribery/deprivation, or force/defense. It is only the rule of law of reciprocity, the judiciary, the monarchy, and the military as last resort, that protects us from abuse of those levers of coercion.

    Combine rule of law of reciprocity, with demonstrated investment and capacity for participation, with demand for truthful reciprocal speech, with houses of the classes, with a monarchy as a judge of last resort – and democracy can work.

    But universal unearned franchise, political parties, single house majoritarianism, and devolution from rule of law to rule by legislation (or even rule by discretion) has proven too vulnerable to baiting the ignorant and unaccountable into hazard with false promise of circumvention of nature’s necessity for markets in everything.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 13:52:00 UTC

  • “WHAT IS YOUR IDEOLOGY?” —“So, what is your political ideology? I mean I know

    “WHAT IS YOUR IDEOLOGY?”

    —“So, what is your political ideology? I mean I know you’re right wing. But, what are you? A Nationalist-Socialist or Libertarian Civic Nationalist?”— Amit Patel

    I am none of those things – all of which i consider excuses for obtaining power under democracy to circumvent markets. I am ‘right wing’ only in the sense that I am intolerant of violations of the laws of nature and the natural law of reciprocity.

    I am an Aryan(european branch of indo-europeans): transcendence of man into gods through competitive heroism, demonstrated excellence, speaking truth, and creating beauty.

    I am a European Sovereigntarian: Markets in everything: Let A Thousand Nations Bloom.

    I am an Aristotelian: Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism,

    I am a Jeffersonian libertarian: a written constitution of natural law, with transactional procedural modifications.

    I am a Constitutional Monarchist favoring multi-house governments as markets for the classes.

    I am a Manorialist: natural eugenics – home before children, family as the central unit of society, bring capital to people not people to capital.

    I am a Conservative: Bear your own costs, externalize no cost, purely empirical government, change by evidence not by hypothesis.

    I am a National(kinship) Socialist: direct the maximum proceeds to the production of capitalizing (not consumptive) commons.

    I am a Kinship Christian: humility in ones never ending pursuit of virtue, exhaust all opportunities for forgiveness before abandoning it, and demonstrate personal acts of charity at personal cost.

    I am a Kinship Pagan: we owe a debt to nature, our ancestors known and named, and known as heroes, and known only as archetypes (gods), and are responsible to them for preserving their investments in making us, just as those that follow us are responsible for preserving our investments in them.

    I am a universalist: any people that wishes european civilization’s benefits can adopt them if they try – or not if they choose not to.

    The Laws of Nature

    The Natural Law

    Self Determination

    Our Transcendence into gods

    Sovereignty to do so

    A Universal Militia

    The Oath of Reciprocal Insurance

    A constitution of the natural law

    Markets in association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities.

    A Judicial Priesthood

    A monarchy as a judge of last resort

    A Cabinet

    Houses for the classes (three or four)

    … Territory

    … Industry

    … Family

    … (Dependents)

    Local Priority in Legislation, regulation, norm.

    Professionalized (Privatized) Education


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-11 08:35:00 UTC

  • ANSWER TO TODAY’S QUESTION by Stephen Thomas –“What’s your position on (hostile

    ANSWER TO TODAY’S QUESTION

    by Stephen Thomas

    –“What’s your position on (hostile political) ‘critics’ that we have seen Israel, the Saudis, and the Russians execute?”–

    Define “critic”.

    1) Is the critic exposing factual information or behavior showing violations of Natural Law?

    Or

    2) Is the critic simply whining about having failed to have his wants served by others?

    Or

    3) Is the critic engaging in ORRGSM (subversion) and causing damage to the Commons with their lies?

    The first is necessary to protect the Commons from parasites (EMAS).

    The second is well… pathetic and sometimes healthy. Venting to avoid potential turmoil.

    The 3rd is unacceptable and must be stopped. Assassination is usually extreme but sometimes warranted.

    So, the critic defines the validity of the response. A critic should also provide solutions or their words have no legitimacy.

    —-

    CD: note how Stephen based his argument on the natural law, and used a series(precision), and then answered with the series rather than a single ideal type (average). This is how you answer questions in natural law.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-10 20:43:00 UTC

  • Agreed. I just do ethnocentric national individual sovereignty and rule of law o

    Agreed. I just do ethnocentric national individual sovereignty and rule of law of reciprocity, monarchy, houses for the classes, and earning the franchise through military service – which means ‘european civilization’ Everything else is propaganda or decoration.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-10 20:04:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226960029686882305

    Reply addressees: @NickJFuentes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226639312277639173


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226639312277639173

  • FUENTES SAYS “NO MORE ISM’S” …. OK. OK. Agreed. I advocate ethnocentric nation

    FUENTES SAYS “NO MORE ISM’S” …. OK.

    OK. Agreed. I advocate ethnocentric nation states under individual sovereignty, rule of law of reciprocity, with hereditary constitutional monarchy, houses for the classes, and earning the franchise through military service, a replacement level family, and the number of people you employ – which means ‘european civilization’ Everything else is propaganda or decoration.

    And so I’ll just change the brand name Propertarianism to an operational name: “The Natural Law of the European Peoples.” or “The White Law” for short.

    How is that?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-10 15:09:00 UTC

  • 8) There is only one source of soverginty-in-fact, liberty, freedom, and subsidy

    8) There is only one source of soverginty-in-fact, liberty, freedom, and subsidy: that is the organized use of warfare to defend the polity from alternatives – especially those that sell the impossible to destroy ethnicity, culture, civlization, by baiting into hazard.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-10 13:52:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226866500545499136

    Reply addressees: @NickJFuentes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226866014849323008


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @NickJFuentes 7) In the ancient world the Enemy used the monopolies of judaism to undermine, christianity to weaken, and islam to invade and destroy by supernaturalism. In the modern world the Enemy used the monopolies of Marxism, Communism, Socialism, Feminism, Postmodernism,by pseudoscience.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1226866014849323008


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @NickJFuentes 7) In the ancient world the Enemy used the monopolies of judaism to undermine, christianity to weaken, and islam to invade and destroy by supernaturalism. In the modern world the Enemy used the monopolies of Marxism, Communism, Socialism, Feminism, Postmodernism,by pseudoscience.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1226866014849323008

  • Nick: 1) It was a false dichotomy: to replace rule of law(Local Capitalism) vs D

    Nick: 1) It was a false dichotomy: to replace rule of law(Local Capitalism) vs Discretionary Rule (International socialism). Individual Sovereignty requires Rule of Law (of Reciprocity) Jury, Thang(Council),Senate, King, Markets in Everything. Tripartism requires three economies.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-02-10 13:35:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226862268782194688

    Reply addressees: @NickJFuentes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226623067604049923


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1226623067604049923