Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • WOMEN AND GENGHIS KHAN We do not stop Genghis Khan from his parasitism by moral

    WOMEN AND GENGHIS KHAN

    We do not stop Genghis Khan from his parasitism by moral demand, but by eliminating his ability to conduct parasitism. We do not stop women from their natural preening, consumption, nesting, parasitism, currying favor and status through redistribution, and undermining the power structure by engaging them in moral argument. They lack the agency to do so.

    You simply create institutions that prohibit them from parasitism, currying favor and status through redistribution and undermining the power structure.

    You deny people opportunity for rational parasitism, you don’t convince them not to engage in it.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 22:08:00 UTC

  • WOMEN AND THE FRANCHISE I take the opposite position: that we have merely given

    WOMEN AND THE FRANCHISE

    I take the opposite position: that we have merely given women the proxy of violence that we call government without providing the same disincentives to abusing it as women do, that we have created for men over thousands of years, as men do. Women do damage via different means than do men. Yet we did not limit their ability to do damage. So we can say our experiment in enfranchisement has failed, or we can improve our institutions such that the even more destructive intuitions of women cannot be let loose by the violence of government under the franchise.

    (Eli has me thinking about solutions rather than criticisms)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-25 22:02:00 UTC

  • Why Do Some Caucasian Men Prefer Asian Women?

    THE CORRECT ANSWER

    While descending from two widely separated waves “generations” that moved out of Africa, Whites have succeeded in significant juvenilization. Asians have succeeded in far greater juvenilization. Asian women are the most juvenilized women on earth. To the point at which they have even gained extended lifespans by delaying the depth of and onset of sexual maturity (compare to central asians, arabs, and sub saharan africans that have NOT engaged in juvenilization.) Secondly, for reasons I am not sure I am confident in addressing, Asians distribute their fat more evenly. And thirdly, Asian IQ is slanted to our educated classes (I suspect it is a narrower distribution because of the juvenilization – and the asian predilection for killing off malcontents in large numbers). So between a ‘more immature look’, more petite look, better weight distribution, and higher average intelligence, the pool of asian women is objectively better than the pool of available white women. Conversely asian women pay a price for mongoloid facial features, and in places like eastern europe where women maintain their weight and walk a great deal, and dress well, asian women lose their advantage.

    That’s just how it is. (I spend an absurd amount of time on mating patterns.)

    That said, it’s largely asian women and white men that account for the increase in American race mixing, since the other numbers are remaining relatively stable. (relatively).

    This is yet another example of the fact that all human behavior can be reduced to some statement analogous to economics.

    Asian women are a better ‘buy’ than white women for average males. White males are often a much better buy than equivalent asian males who have their own decreased market value. Largely because asians seem to require high context culture (which I won’t go into) and whites thrive in low context cultures. (as is evident in our languages). So asian men in asia and here are at a disadvantage.

    cheers

    https://www.quora.com/Why-do-some-Caucasian-men-prefer-Asian-women

  • Why Do Some Caucasian Men Prefer Asian Women?

    THE CORRECT ANSWER

    While descending from two widely separated waves “generations” that moved out of Africa, Whites have succeeded in significant juvenilization. Asians have succeeded in far greater juvenilization. Asian women are the most juvenilized women on earth. To the point at which they have even gained extended lifespans by delaying the depth of and onset of sexual maturity (compare to central asians, arabs, and sub saharan africans that have NOT engaged in juvenilization.) Secondly, for reasons I am not sure I am confident in addressing, Asians distribute their fat more evenly. And thirdly, Asian IQ is slanted to our educated classes (I suspect it is a narrower distribution because of the juvenilization – and the asian predilection for killing off malcontents in large numbers). So between a ‘more immature look’, more petite look, better weight distribution, and higher average intelligence, the pool of asian women is objectively better than the pool of available white women. Conversely asian women pay a price for mongoloid facial features, and in places like eastern europe where women maintain their weight and walk a great deal, and dress well, asian women lose their advantage.

    That’s just how it is. (I spend an absurd amount of time on mating patterns.)

    That said, it’s largely asian women and white men that account for the increase in American race mixing, since the other numbers are remaining relatively stable. (relatively).

    This is yet another example of the fact that all human behavior can be reduced to some statement analogous to economics.

    Asian women are a better ‘buy’ than white women for average males. White males are often a much better buy than equivalent asian males who have their own decreased market value. Largely because asians seem to require high context culture (which I won’t go into) and whites thrive in low context cultures. (as is evident in our languages). So asian men in asia and here are at a disadvantage.

    cheers

    https://www.quora.com/Why-do-some-Caucasian-men-prefer-Asian-women

  • Where are these comments from smart women coming from? This is awesome

    Where are these comments from smart women coming from? This is awesome.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-23 14:29:00 UTC

  • (can we avoid the underage model thing please. it’s creepy. call me whatever you

    (can we avoid the underage model thing please. it’s creepy. call me whatever you want but it’s creepy. even some of these 21/22 models look 15 and, sorry, it’s creepy. It’s just creepy.)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-23 13:43:00 UTC

  • “you’re no philosopher!”— First, ridicule, rallying and shaming is (a) feminin

    —“you’re no philosopher!”—

    First, ridicule, rallying and shaming is (a) feminine, (b) marxist, (c) demonstration of the failure of one’s ability to construct arguments (d) demonstration of the failure of one’s ideology.

    I qualify for having increased decidability and explanatory power in my domain of inquiry. That is what qualifies one as a philosopher. Sorry. Just how it is.

    I probably qualify for merely explaining the reason why Mises failed along with Brouwer and Bridgman. But certainly for explaining the relationship between them, popper and hayek. And for solving the problem hayek couldn’t complete, by translating rothbard’s ghetto legal ethics, and hoppe’s kantian rationalist ethics, into anglo empirical and scientific language. A language that can be used to construct proofs – what hoppe was trying to construct.

    So again, you don’t have an argument, right? You are just another crypto-marxist begging for free redistribution of the productivity of others by parasitic consumption of and free-riding upon the commons they produce, rather than directly upon the productivity of what they originally produce?

    Right? That’s what you demonstrate that you do? You’re just another crypto marxist with a different strategy for parasitism. Andyou defend your parasitism with ridicule rallying and shaming beause you, like women, cannot face the truth of your fantasies: you beg for free riding as a claim against the productivity of others.

    I eat you libertine munchkins like pringles with beer. lol

    Bend over.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-23 13:04:00 UTC

  • “”Objectification” is a really cool concept, but the phenomenology is useless or

    —“”Objectification” is a really cool concept, but the phenomenology is useless or even misleading unless you consider it to be the “user interface” for the genotype. This author explains it well: your qualia is the “control panel” of the Self, not the Self itself.—” Adam Voight

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-23 12:26:00 UTC

  • Untitled

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-20 18:48:00 UTC

  • YES, WOMEN ARE TREATED DIFFERENTLY FROM MEN (because they behave differently fro

    YES, WOMEN ARE TREATED DIFFERENTLY FROM MEN

    (because they behave differently from men)

    Kimberley O’Brien: —“Men are treated differently than women. I named the areas within which equality need happen. You’re triggered, angry, for no reason related to me.”—-

    Yes women are treated with material privilege at all times but treated with suspicion of loyalty and agency at all times. Which again, you demonstrate.

    Women are demonstrably less loyal, destroy each other in the workplace, hen peck for advancement, readily make use of manipulation in the work place, are less empirical, less theoretical, and less neutral in decision making, and are widely unwanted as managers by both sexes.

    The evidence is that women are relatively poor empirical executives but can be successful relationship executives (customer relations). At the limits of ability almost without exception, worldwide, in every single theatre and discipline, men outperform women dramatically, simply because at the higher end, the ratio of competent men, who area also loyal, neutral, and empirical is so high as to make women by and large statistically insignificant. By the data on intelligence alone, we should never see women raise above the single digits in the most demanding of roles in society.

    in fact, when women are placed in executive roles it is because it is easier to find a woman who will manage a company through failure, or when in board roles what we see is women as a luxury good who adds value only in consumer products where women are the majority customer base.

    All of this occurs even before the recognition that women prefer a wider array of ‘goods’ in their lives, and are less likely to specialize, and demonstrate behavioral side effects, choose the cushiest and lowest risk jobs leaving the high risk to males, thereby pushing males out of the middle ‘cushy’ workplace, into the higher competitive top, more stressful and strenuous lower, and most risky lowest jobs – which of course, no feminist ever accounts for. Because women are creatures of selfishness that never extends beyond their children. And men are creatures of the tribe whose selfishness extends at least to that distance.

    These are just facts. I have not only followed the research and findings for decades, but run my own companies, and consulted for hundreds more, and the data is the same: women gather information from people better, and men interpret empirical information better, and decide better neutrally, and manage better neutrally. Why? we have infinitely less emotional baggage in our decision making.

    A baggage which you demonstrate.

    And willfully ignore.

    And then lie about.

    This is the LOYAL, NEUTRAL, EMPIRICAL, TRUTH.

    WHich is why you fear it.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-02-20 15:11:00 UTC