Theme: Sex Differences

THE ANSWER YOU”RE LOOKING FOR IN TWO PARTS

1) In no small part, a male is produced by damaging the gender-neutral fetus in utero, so that males mature more slowly, and develop a bias toward specialization while females a bias toward generalization.

This ‘damage’ by the mother in utero (likely due to testosterone), produces both less sensitive and therefore less ‘struggle for life’ by male infants, plus delays verbal and other sensitive development, which is why males both specialize (they must learn rather than feel), and why males mature more slowly than females both physically, emotionally, and mentally. But in exchange gain more ‘agency’ (less victims of emotion) and greater ability to perceive the physical world ‘as it is’.

So, males have a lower survival rate.

2) Plus (as others have mentioned) the benefit of male children decreases as the ratio approaches 1 to 1.

3) Males are genetically expendable (and women treat us as such) since the genome improves if only the fittest survive. This may explain why we are still evolving but it is possible that we reached ‘peak human’ already, and that since agrarianism, and later, with urbanization, (because cities are defect creators).

WOMEN, AGENCY, AND NUMBER OF CHILDREN

More and more evident to me that unless a women has more than two children she tends to never mature intellectually and socially. Women evolved to produce five or six children at which point out of necessity they must approach the agency of men for their children to survive, just as men must evolve agency early in order for the tribe to survive.

I would myself prefer that women bore six children and didn’t enter the workplace, and that we dramatically reduced taxes and redistribution. Because I care for my tribe above myself.

Conservative women are most interesting because they possess agency, and often possess it from living in large working or middle class families.

Let us see if the majority of women can care for the tribe above themselves. I doubt it. I think that what keeps people in the lower classes is lack of personal agency, and therefore they ‘sense’ the world as without agency like we all sense the world according to our sense of agency.