Theme: Sex Differences

  • Two Statements on Women.

    WOMEN AND GENGHIS KHAN We do not stop Genghis Khan from his parasitism by moral demand, but by eliminating his ability to conduct parasitism. We do not stop women from their natural preening, consumption, nesting, parasitism, currying favor and status through redistribution, and undermining the power structure by engaging them in moral argument. They lack the agency to do so. You simply create institutions that prohibit them from parasitism, currying favor and status through redistribution and undermining the power structure. You deny people opportunity for rational parasitism, you don’t convince them not to engage in it. WOMEN AND THE FRANCHISE I take the opposite position: that we have merely given women the proxy of violence that we call government without providing the same disincentives to abusing it as women do, that we have created for men over thousands of years, as men do. Women do damage via different means than do men. Yet we did not limit their ability to do damage. So we can say our experiment in enfranchisement has failed, or we can improve our institutions such that the even more destructive intuitions of women cannot be let loose by the violence of government under the franchise. (Eli has me thinking about solutions rather than criticisms)

  • The Failure of Liberalism Was Failing to Understand It.

    Empirically speaking, women voting without separate houses for men and women, has been the failing of liberalism. The monarchy (state), nobility (regions), commons (businessmen), could have been expanded to the proletarian( working classes ) and the homemaker(women), and we could have continued the anglo saxon tradition of using houses to form a market between the classes. Democracy has failed worldwide because women have narrower interests and vote more consistently in blocks, and by destroying the family women have destroyed western civilization: our central unit of production of generations, production of norms and traditions, production of commons, and production of goods and services. It’s just empirical. Look at the voting history. There would never have been anything ‘left’ in this country nor its decline had women had their own house.

  • The Failure of Liberalism Was Failing to Understand It.

    Empirically speaking, women voting without separate houses for men and women, has been the failing of liberalism. The monarchy (state), nobility (regions), commons (businessmen), could have been expanded to the proletarian( working classes ) and the homemaker(women), and we could have continued the anglo saxon tradition of using houses to form a market between the classes. Democracy has failed worldwide because women have narrower interests and vote more consistently in blocks, and by destroying the family women have destroyed western civilization: our central unit of production of generations, production of norms and traditions, production of commons, and production of goods and services. It’s just empirical. Look at the voting history. There would never have been anything ‘left’ in this country nor its decline had women had their own house.

  • Reproductive Strategies and Markets

    by John Dow A polity can only generate the sovereign power necessary to establish and defend itself via competitiveness in the violence market. Production (Brotherly) and Reproduction (Motherly) Strategies obviously require cultivation to successfully compete fundamentally in intergroup Violence (Fatherly). Without production you lack weapons technology and food and shelter for your soldiers, without reproduction you lack soldiers. However, through the institutions of property and marriage, individuals compete individually within the polity with one another for individual success. In the institution of military, individuals must cooperate for the good of the group, they sacrifice their individual potential cost to accrue benefits to group fitness. Fundamentally, participation in intergroup violence brings the individual’s interests in allignment with the group’s interests.

    Individuals who merely compete in the markets for production and reproduction lack this grounding, they compete with the other members of their polity on behalf of themselves, not each other, hence they require regulation through the institutions of property and marriage to limit negative externalities from their behaviour. If given power, these people will rationally vote in their self-interest to transfer wealth to themselves, not the collective interest to transfer wealth to their group.

  • Reproductive Strategies and Markets

    by John Dow A polity can only generate the sovereign power necessary to establish and defend itself via competitiveness in the violence market. Production (Brotherly) and Reproduction (Motherly) Strategies obviously require cultivation to successfully compete fundamentally in intergroup Violence (Fatherly). Without production you lack weapons technology and food and shelter for your soldiers, without reproduction you lack soldiers. However, through the institutions of property and marriage, individuals compete individually within the polity with one another for individual success. In the institution of military, individuals must cooperate for the good of the group, they sacrifice their individual potential cost to accrue benefits to group fitness. Fundamentally, participation in intergroup violence brings the individual’s interests in allignment with the group’s interests.

    Individuals who merely compete in the markets for production and reproduction lack this grounding, they compete with the other members of their polity on behalf of themselves, not each other, hence they require regulation through the institutions of property and marriage to limit negative externalities from their behaviour. If given power, these people will rationally vote in their self-interest to transfer wealth to themselves, not the collective interest to transfer wealth to their group.

  • “Feminism is not the result of the thought process of grown women but observatio

    —“Feminism is not the result of the thought process of grown women but observations made by a female child that then get turned into a law”—


    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-21 20:38:00 UTC

  • Example. Library, woman shrieks because she can’t find her child for a moment. E

    Example.

    Library, woman shrieks because she can’t find her child for a moment.

    Every man in hearing range is on his feet and moving before her next breath. We don’t even think, we just move.

    All the women…. sitting and watching.

    Never understand why women are afraid of men in general.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-21 16:19:00 UTC

  • REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES AND MARKETS by Joel Davis A polity can only generate the

    REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES AND MARKETS

    by Joel Davis

    A polity can only generate the sovereign power necessary to establish and defend itself via competitiveness in the violence market.

    Production (Brotherly) and Reproduction (Motherly) Strategies obviously require cultivation to successfully compete fundamentally in intergroup Violence (Fatherly).

    Without production you lack weapons technology and food and shelter for your soldiers, without reproduction you lack soldiers.

    However, through the institutions of property and marriage, individuals compete individually within the polity with one another for individual success.

    In the institution of military, individuals must cooperate for the good of the group, they sacrifice their individual potential cost to accrue benefits to group fitness.

    Fundamentally, participation in intergroup violence brings the individual’s interests in allignment with the group’s interests.

    Individuals who merely compete in the markets for production and reproduction lack this grounding, they compete with the other members of their polity on behalf of themselves, not each other, hence they require regulation through the institutions of property and marriage to limit negative externalities from their behaviour. If given power, these people will rationally vote in their self-interest to transfer wealth to themselves, not the collective interest to transfer wealth to their group.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-20 18:40:00 UTC

  • THE FAILURE OF LIBERALISM WAS FAILING TO UNDERSTAND IT. Empirically speaking, wo

    THE FAILURE OF LIBERALISM WAS FAILING TO UNDERSTAND IT.

    Empirically speaking, women voting without separate houses for men and women, has been the failing of liberalism.

    The monarchy (state), nobility (regions), commons (businessmen), could have been expanded to the proletarian( working classes ) and the homemaker(women), and we could have continued the anglo saxon tradition of using houses to form a market between the classes. Democracy has failed worldwide because women have narrower interests and vote more consistently in blocks, and by destroying the family women have destroyed western civilization: our central unit of production of generations, production of norms and traditions, production of commons, and production of goods and services.

    It’s just empirical. Look at the voting history. There would never have been anything ‘left’ in this country nor its decline had women had their own house.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-19 19:33:00 UTC

  • This is hardly a group for intellectual discourse, but empirically speaking, wom

    This is hardly a group for intellectual discourse, but empirically speaking, women voting without separate houses for men and women, has been the failing of liberalism.

    The monarchy (state), nobility (regions), commons (businessmen), could have been expanded to the proletarian( working classes ) and the homemaker(women), and we could have continued the anglo saxon tradition of using houses to form a market between the classes. Democracy has failed worldwide because women have narrower interests and vote more consistently in blocks, and by destroying the family women have destroyed western civilization: our central unit of production of generations, production of norms and traditions, production of commons, and production of goods and services.

    It’s just empirical. Look at the voting history. There would never have been anything ‘left’ in this country nor its decline had women had their own house.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-03-19 19:33:00 UTC