Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • THE ECONOMY IS THE THIRD ACTOR IN EVERY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN A MAN AND WOMAN. by

    THE ECONOMY IS THE THIRD ACTOR IN EVERY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN A MAN AND WOMAN.
    by Michael Churchill

    The problem seems like a sort of “time mismatch.” Men need women when the women are young, and women need men when the women are older. Obviously marriage was a compromise of these two needs. But the urgency of making the compromise in the first place lessens as a society gets richer. The economy is the third actor in every relationship between a man and woman.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:21:57 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576378137043808

  • DEFINITION: INTERSECTIONALITY (Conspiracy Theory)(Conspiritualism) (Anti-Darwini

    DEFINITION: INTERSECTIONALITY
    (Conspiracy Theory)(Conspiritualism) (Anti-Darwinian)

    Intersectionality, also referred to as intersectional feminism, is a branch of feminism which identifies how different aspects of social and political discrimination overlap with gender. The term was coined by black feminist scholar Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw in 1989.

    It is a non-empirical qualitative analytic framework that identifies how interlocking systems of power affect those who are most marginalized in society.

    There are various forms of social stratification, such as class, race, sexual orientation, age, religion, creed, disability and gender, which are included in the consideration of intersectional feminism and its social and cultural effects.

    The purpose of intersectionality is to identify that these forms of discrimination are related to one another, and take these relationships into account when working to promote social and political equity.

    While the theory began as an exploration of the oppression of women of color within society, today the analysis has expanded to include many more aspects of social identity.

    Intersectionality may also be related to the term triple oppression, which engages with similar themes.

    Critics have pointed out that intersectionality relies entirely on non-objective concepts such as “systems of power” which themselves lack a material reality, and therefore empirical basis for study, making it an ideological set of ideas, and not a proper sociological concept.

    (See “Conspiratualism” at: facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10157386088)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 14:59:16 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576288904451780

  • THE ULTIMATE RECIPROCITY. A woman can choose to kill an innocent baby because it

    THE ULTIMATE RECIPROCITY.

    A woman can choose to kill an innocent baby because it will impose costs upon her because of her reproductive strategy – as mother of a child; but a man cannot choose to punish or kill a guilty person for the costs he imposes upon him because of his reproductive strategy: the long term survivability of the polity.

    Reciprocity. Termination is a right for all or it is not a right.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 14:58:17 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576285103428859

  • THE CORRECT ANSWER: Herd (Female) instinct on the left in pursuit of proportiona

    THE CORRECT ANSWER:
    Herd (Female) instinct on the left in pursuit of proportionality-> equality and hierarchy suppression (competitive child).
    -vs-
    Pack (Male) instinct on the right, in pursuit of reciprocity-> meritocracy and hierarchy expression (competitive tribe).

    That’s it.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 14:21:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159107348511776770

    Reply addressees: @BrendanBuck @jackshafer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159099746394550272

    IN REPLY TO:

    @BrendanBuck

    .@jackshafer: “What is it about Twitter that causes some people to lose all sense of proportion when they sign on? Is it the delight of joining a mob? The immediate rush that hacktivism produces?” https://t.co/b2aRktAeeo

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159099746394550272

  • (relationship humor) —“When women wear bikinis they expose 90% of their bodies

    (relationship humor)
    —“When women wear bikinis they expose 90% of their bodies. But men are thoughtful, and respectful, and only look at the covered parts.”—

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 13:45:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1159098286189551617

  • Why, if people can be misled by Marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, all

    Why, if people can be misled by Marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, all of which are a revolt against darwin on one hand and western tripartism on an other would you think it would not be easier with one vehicle of communication: the pulpit and the big lie.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-05 20:04:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158468926692614144

    Reply addressees: @ShiarTal

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158468515483017219

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @ShiarTal So with a forced monopoly on literacy, a banning and burning of books, a mandate to ‘believe in a falsehood’, the parasitism of the church on useful capital, of course we see SOMETHING. We just see trivialities compared pre roman, roman, greco-roman, civilizations.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158468515483017219

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @ShiarTal So with a forced monopoly on literacy, a banning and burning of books, a mandate to ‘believe in a falsehood’, the parasitism of the church on useful capital, of course we see SOMETHING. We just see trivialities compared pre roman, roman, greco-roman, civilizations.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158468515483017219

  • The Indo european expansion was almost entirely male. It was made possible by 40

    The Indo european expansion was almost entirely male.
    It was made possible by 40% increase in calories from the ability to consume milk, the domestication of the horse, the use of bronze, and wheel, and they killed every male they encountered, and impregnated every woman.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-05 15:24:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158398428545728512

    Reply addressees: @willwilkinson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158398067869138946

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @willwilkinson The dirty secret of western excellence (and its subsequent decline in the 20th) is its the most eugenic civilization in history of any scale. And like the East Asians, eugenic civilization is only possible under redistributive homogeneity.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158398067869138946

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @willwilkinson The dirty secret of western excellence (and its subsequent decline in the 20th) is its the most eugenic civilization in history of any scale. And like the East Asians, eugenic civilization is only possible under redistributive homogeneity.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158398067869138946

  • Men are not permitted to dominance play in public. They are prohibited in all wa

    Men are not permitted to dominance play in public. They are prohibited in all walks of life – other than games -w hich is why they are popular means of sedation of anxiety. But it is precisely this dominance play that makes men care about by continuous investment. You made this.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-05 14:09:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158379539468300288

    Reply addressees: @ENBrown

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158315123305603073

    IN REPLY TO:

    @ENBrown

    ‘‘Twas a time when young angry men had a lot more opportunities for socially sanctioned violence and also a lot more chances to get themselves killed young

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158315123305603073

  • IT IS ONE THING TO SHAME THE ABSENCE OF ARGUMENT, AND ANOTHER TO SHAME BECAUSE O

    IT IS ONE THING TO SHAME THE ABSENCE OF ARGUMENT, AND ANOTHER TO SHAME BECAUSE OF ITS ABSENCE.

    —“Haven’t you used the same ‘feminine’ approaches consistently to vilify the left.”—@adamszequi

    —“We don’t seek to undermine their arguments, because they don’t have any. We seek to expose their lack of arguments. We don’t need to vilify them, their actions when brought to light condemn them better then anything we could ever do.”—Noah Revoy @noahrevoy

    Adam, (All);

    1) It is one thing to shame the absence of argument, and another to shame because of its absence.

    2) If you encounter GSRRM (avoidance of argument) then respond with it, then repeat the central argument.

    3) Use their shaming as a vehicle for distributing information: illustration of their lack of argument, their inability to provide one, and the counter argument in Propertarian (natural law) to demonstrate their attempted fraud or deceit..

    4) Repeat this cycle until they give up, or all opportunity to spread the argument has been exhausted.

    – Cheers

    ( cc @stefanmolyneux
    Stefan uses the tolerant British(anglo) Technique of Wit.
    I use the intolerant technique of Prosecution.
    I have little ‘christian’ left in me.
    It’s suicidal.
    )

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-04 21:16:11 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102560784120723231

  • WE USE “GRRSM: AGAINST THE LEFT TO REMIND EACH OTHER IT IS OK TO BE DISGUSTED BY

    WE USE “GRRSM: AGAINST THE LEFT TO REMIND EACH OTHER IT IS OK TO BE DISGUSTED BY THAT BEHAVIOR.
    by Luke Weinhagen

    The left used these feminine techniques only because the techniques have proven effective against their opponents. Not because the left possesses any of the feminine virtues these manipulation techniques are effective at leveraging.

    We can not guilt the left, they feel no guilt.
    We can not shame the left, they feel no shame.
    We can not moralize the left, they hold no moral to leverage.

    Every manifestation of GRRSM shows up for the left as an alert to possible ostracism from the herd (why they always end up finding their way from all the others to “rally”).

    We do not use GRRSM to manipulate the left. We have absolutely no expectation of them changing their behavior.

    We use GRRSM against the left to remind each other it is ok to be disgusted by that behavior.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-04 21:00:42 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102560723273656121