IT IS ONE THING TO SHAME THE ABSENCE OF ARGUMENT, AND ANOTHER TO SHAME BECAUSE O

IT IS ONE THING TO SHAME THE ABSENCE OF ARGUMENT, AND ANOTHER TO SHAME BECAUSE OF ITS ABSENCE.

—“Haven’t you used the same ‘feminine’ approaches consistently to vilify the left.”—@adamszequi

—“We don’t seek to undermine their arguments, because they don’t have any. We seek to expose their lack of arguments. We don’t need to vilify them, their actions when brought to light condemn them better then anything we could ever do.”—Noah Revoy @noahrevoy

Adam, (All);

1) It is one thing to shame the absence of argument, and another to shame because of its absence.

2) If you encounter GSRRM (avoidance of argument) then respond with it, then repeat the central argument.

3) Use their shaming as a vehicle for distributing information: illustration of their lack of argument, their inability to provide one, and the counter argument in Propertarian (natural law) to demonstrate their attempted fraud or deceit..

4) Repeat this cycle until they give up, or all opportunity to spread the argument has been exhausted.

– Cheers

( cc @stefanmolyneux
Stefan uses the tolerant British(anglo) Technique of Wit.
I use the intolerant technique of Prosecution.
I have little ‘christian’ left in me.
It’s suicidal.
)