Curt Doolittle

Theme: Sex Differences

  • A RESISTANCE MOVEMENT BY UNATTRACTIVE WOMEN, It’s working. šŸ˜‰ Feminism is a resi

    A RESISTANCE MOVEMENT BY UNATTRACTIVE WOMEN,

    It’s working. šŸ˜‰ Feminism is a resistance movement by unattractive women, who over invest in sophistry, which is why conservative women are better looking and have more children. Like Antifa is a resistance movement by upper proletarians privileged with middle class consumption.

    No matter where you go or what you do, your ancestor’s expression of their cumulative decisions is with you in your genes, and your genes create your sexual, social, economic, and political market value. You aren’t and weren’t oppressed. You were, and are, domesticated animals.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:54:58 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576507976741237

  • “Turns out bullying men into not supporting single women is astonishingly effect

    —“Turns out bullying men into not supporting single women is astonishingly effective”—Johannes Jost Meixner

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:53:51 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576503613995482

  • DYSGENICS IN THE USA AND UK REAL DECLINE IS 1.23/DECADE Woodley, Michael A. (201

    DYSGENICS IN THE USA AND UK REAL DECLINE IS 1.23/DECADE

    Woodley, Michael A. (2015). “How fragile is our intellect? Estimating losses in general intelligence due to both selection and mutation accumulation”. Personality and Individual Differences. 75: 80ā€“84. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.047.

    HIGHLIGHTS
    ā€¢g Losses due to dysgenic selection in nine US and UK studies are meta-analyzed.
    ā€¢A decline of .39 points per decade is found.
    ā€¢Mutation load should enhance losses due to selection.
    ā€¢Each year of paternal age adds 2 new mutations and reduces offspring g by .084 points.
    ā€¢Combining selection and mutation losses reveals decadal g decline of 1.23 points.

    ABSTRACT
    Two dysgenic models of declining general intelligence have been proposed. The first posits that since the Industrial Revolution those with low g have had a reproductive advantage over those with high g. The second posits that relaxed purifying selection against deleterious mutations in modern populations has led to g declining due to mutation accumulation. Here, a meta-analytic estimate of the decline due to selection is computed across nine US and UK studies, revealing a loss of .39 points per decade (combined N = 202,924). By combining findings from a high-precision study of the effects of paternal age on offspring g with a study of paternal age and offspring de novo mutation numbers, it is proposed that, 70 de novo mutations per familial generation should reduce offspring g by 2.94 points, or .84 points per decade. Combining the selection and mutation accumulation losses yields a potential overall dysgenic loss of 1.23 points per decade, with upper and lower bound values ranging from 1.92 to .53 points per decade. This estimate is close to those from studies employing the secular slowing of simple reaction time as a potential indicator of declining g, consistent with predictions that mutation accumulation may play a role in these findings.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:45:52 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576472174471993

  • LEFTIST FEMINIST PSYCHOS ARE USEFUL IDIOTS. Ah, no we are just experimenting wit

    LEFTIST FEMINIST PSYCHOS ARE USEFUL IDIOTS.

    Ah, no we are just experimenting with you given that Noah Revoy has found a hot spot, hot spots generate controversy, controversy attracts eyeballs, some percentage of eyeballs will resonate with our movement, and you will have provided us with free advertising, marketing, and promotion.

    Ask Noah how many new customers he’s gotten because of you already. (I know the answer, which is why we’re keeping you ruffled.) You aren’t very smart or you would realize that the only possible negative feedback you can give that will work is to do nothing.

    Look at what molyneux is doing right now for the same reason. You are fulfilling the same function as the Psycho Four congresswomen – driving people do us, because you’re so absurd.

    So please, keep it up, keep running left. Don’t try to create savings, careers, families, businesses, industries, or long term capital in the commons. Just keep trying to force spending and debt.

    We love you.
    You’re perfect.
    Predicable.
    Catastrophic.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:33:39 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576424171714589

  • “Western Women Compete for Signals, Status, and Approval, from Other Women – Men

    “Western Women Compete for Signals, Status, and Approval, from Other Women – Men Are Incidental: Women Are Herd Animals: Hens, Horses, Men Are Pack Animals: Wolves, Chimpanzees. At Least Most of Us Are.”

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:32:01 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576417763515124

  • A mother’s time and attention is a non-substitutable good. A man’s military serv

    A mother’s time and attention is a non-substitutable good.
    A man’s military services is a non substitutable good.
    All other goods are substitutable.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:31:51 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576417077744530

  • ON MARRIAGE, CHILDREN, HAPPINESS, AND THE WAR AGAINST US What, that women will b

    ON MARRIAGE, CHILDREN, HAPPINESS, AND THE WAR AGAINST US

    What, that women will be happier if they have kids younger, and have more of them? I think [Molyneux is] just stating what the data says. Married people with children are happier. Although it might be that they’re simply better people in the first place, and that’s what better people do.

    —“Married people are happier perhaps because happier people are more likely to get married. Never thought of that did you? Thought not.”–@adambutler65

    Of course I did:
    –Although it might be that they’re simply better people in the first place, and that’s what better people do.–

    —“No you didnā€™t. You were saying that women and married people are happier *because* they have kids. So what about married people who think theyā€™d be happier without kids? Or who canā€™t have kids? They are lesser ā€œbetter peopleā€? Your argument and world view fall apart. Goodbye.”—@adambutler65

    Yes it is what I said. I just also said that better people were happier. And you can’t bear being told to your face that you’re not only dead weight on the planet and mankind, but undesirable, and a lesser human. Conversely you could learn to be a better person by working at it.

    Children teach you to be unselfish, collective, and productive, in exchange for insurance against the decline of energy, ability, social and economic market value in maturity and old age.

    I don’t make errors. It’s my job – to compensate for the industrialization of sophism pseudoscience fictionalism, and deceit, manufactured to sell hyperconsumption to you, in the ancient war of the underclasses against their betters, by the promulgation of envy.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:28:05 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576402256554029

  • MALE ARISTOCRACY OF LAND AGAINST FEMALE PEASANTRY OF SHEPHERDS. The ancient war

    MALE ARISTOCRACY OF LAND AGAINST FEMALE PEASANTRY OF SHEPHERDS.

    The ancient war of the low trust tribal people unable to produce commons or polities and obtain the gains thereof, against the high trust national people, able to produce commons and polities and the gains thereof: Male Aristocracy of Land Against Female Peasantry of Shepherds.

    (What do you think the story of Cain and Abel is about?)

    Semites invented priesthoods, deceit, and communism. The Afro Asiatic Deception of The Feminine. Dysgenia.

    Indo europeans invented aristocracy and markets in everything. The Indo European Testimony of the Masculine. Eugenia.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:25:45 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576393072172630

  • THE FUTURE ISN’T WHAT YOU THINK If men and women won’t insure each other in matu

    THE FUTURE ISN’T WHAT YOU THINK

    If men and women won’t insure each other in maturity and old age, then men will develop alternative organizations (again) to insure one another in maturity and old age – and DEVOTE THE CAPITAL TO IT that is currently consumed entirely by women.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:22:22 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576379796444907

  • COOPERATION BETWEEN GENDERS IS ONLY USEFUL UNTIL IT’S NOT. —“Look after oursel

    COOPERATION BETWEEN GENDERS IS ONLY USEFUL UNTIL IT’S NOT.

    —“Look after ourselves, put our needs first, do whatever we want with our time, you know, just live like a man..”—@alison__wright

    Living “like a man”, during our evolution, in prehistory, in ancient history, and right up until the european era, frequently involved treating women as another domesticated animal – property to be used in his interests. If men want to put our needs first AGAIN, it’s EASY. OK?

    You mean, you MAY as long as it’s in our interests not to revert to prior techniques, and to END the experiment in female defense under rule of law, choice of her fertility, property rights, participation in economic production, freedom of speech, and political enfranchisement.

    Never presume we are equal. The first resource is time, and the second is violence, and cooperation only comes into play when it is more rewarding over time, to cooperate rather than engage in predation. Women have rights and privileges, just like the weak do: it’s just cheaper.

    So don’t make it too ‘expensive’ to ‘tolerate’ you.

    Have we had enough dose of reality yet? Ok. Good. Now have a pat on the head and go back to playing with the garden – that men have made for you.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:22:10 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576378994210790