If we are conquered by the barbarians yet again, and it is achieved through the folly of our women, then what will we learn from this lesson?
Our vanity.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 03:52:00 UTC
If we are conquered by the barbarians yet again, and it is achieved through the folly of our women, then what will we learn from this lesson?
Our vanity.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-26 03:52:00 UTC
I suspect one of the reasons western women have had such great liberty and choice of mates is because there were no competing tribes as there were in the fertile crescent, desert and steppe.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 12:04:00 UTC
We have 60 years of consistent data that in risk and results oriented work both genders prefer male execs less influenced by sentiment.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 09:00:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713289552279048192
Reply addressees: @wef
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713287575943909376
IN REPLY TO:
@wef
Is an ‘old boys’ network’ holding women back? https://t.co/fd6eBPZZBO #gender #work https://t.co/geOfVeha1d
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713287575943909376
Why does WEF propagate these falsehoods that increase conflict? We know the gap is because of loyalty, risk and hours at work not bias
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 08:59:30 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713289191254331392
Reply addressees: @wef
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713287575943909376
IN REPLY TO:
@wef
Is an ‘old boys’ network’ holding women back? https://t.co/fd6eBPZZBO #gender #work https://t.co/geOfVeha1d
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713287575943909376
The demand to watch women compete is far lower than the demand to watch men compete. The market doesn’t lie. We shouldnt either.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 06:18:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713248668833423360
Reply addressees: @wef
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713244130638499840
IN REPLY TO:
@wef
This is how the #gendergap works in sport https://t.co/KbTWz4i1os https://t.co/U49GEETiko
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/713244130638499840
Western women have almost always dressed fashionably when possible, (a) because of higher sexual dimorphism and slightly lower sexual maturity, and greater feminine beauty because of it, (b) because we have had voluntary marriage for thousands of years, (c) because we delayed marriage for at least a thousand if not three thousand years, (d) because we view our women as ‘prizes’ and a demonstration of wealth. (e) because we have rarely had strong states and the strong can make such demonstrations and not fear them being taken by warlords (f) because women have had PROPERTY RIGHTS in the west for over a thousand years. And because (g) we have always had a higher respect for women than other civilizations – its pretty clearly a genetic bias, and we dont know why yet.
It’s not a mystery why cultures dress the way they do. It’s not simply fashion. It’s signaling. It always has been and always will be.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 04:01:00 UTC
If we can dumb down SAT tests to accommodate women, and if we can dumb down the courses in the classroom to accommodate women, and we can dumb down the courses in the university to accommodate women, why can’t we have separate classrooms, courses, and universities, for men?
Why can’t we have equality of fulfillment?
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 03:53:00 UTC
If men have to do the high risk and dirty jobs, work more hours, have a harder time staying in the work force, fight in war, and die younger, or – pay high taxes for not doing so, then why can’t women have to produce children or pay taxes for not doing so? Women can’t fight (sorry it’s true), and men can’t bear children (self evident).
I mean, why can’t we have equality?
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 03:50:00 UTC
It also leads to very low sperm counts. Which helps the rest of us quite a bit.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 09:13:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712930368454791168
Reply addressees: @CauseWereWasted
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712923416987312129
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712923416987312129
I am pretty sure gender differences in management come down to this (and the data has been accumulated over sixty years now, and remains remarkably consistent).
If the work requires direction and dispute resolution people prefer a male leader who is less influenced by factors outside of the objective.
If the work requires facilitation people prefer a female leader who is conscious of the factors outside of the objective.
Men for risk and dispute resolution women for consensus.
This holds true across genders. With both genders preferring men by a statistically significant margin.
Both genders literally despise leaders who try to cross gender roles.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 05:06:00 UTC