(by Eli Harman) [A]dvanced civilization, with production and division of labor, is necessarily founded on property, which is a masculine innovation, the more private, the more masculine. Property is that which you obtain and maintain at personal cost, and that which you are willing and able to defend. Property rights are a subset of that property that your peers are willing to ensure, just as law is a subset of morality. Males evolved to specialize in the production of violence which sustains all property claims (and supply even the violence necessary to sustain communal forms of property in pre-civilized, matriarchal, societies.) Patriarchy and private property originate in bands of men organized for aggressive conquest, and the subsequent necessity of dividing the spoils of conquest (land, goods, and women) between them, organizing them for production, and defending them henceforth. Once unleashed on the world, patriarchal civilization proved unstoppable. And its advantages, in productivity, including but not limited to the production of violence, have only snowballed over time with the accumulation of capital and eugenic reproduction (made possible by restraining females’ dysgenic, egalitarian, tendencies.) Recent innovations to the contrary, which are really just regressive throwbacks to the paleolithic, were only made possible because one patriarchal society, Western civilization, attained such a commanding lead over adversaries and antagonists, that our forefathers thought they could afford to indulge their women without limit. And for a while, we could. But the madness has gone exponential, and a century and a half of unchecked consumption and decay wrought by faulty egalitarian premises have brought our enemies, once more, near enough to parity that they may begin punishing us for our folly. We will learn. Or we will die. But things will not continue as they were. Eli Harman.
Theme: Sex Differences
-
One of the evolutionary virtues of taller peoples (scandinavians) is that women’
One of the evolutionary virtues of taller peoples (scandinavians) is that women’s pelvises are large enough to pass large crainiums without sacrificing femininity.
We may like our petite women but we can ask for thicker women (turkic/greek/mongolian) or our lower classes, or we can ask for larger women who preserve ratios but get larger pelvises with height.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 04:50:00 UTC
-
RT @AliceTeller: No man has ever presumed to control my thoughts, preferences, l
RT @AliceTeller: No man has ever presumed to control my thoughts, preferences, life choices or anything else as much as feminists do. https…
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-19 23:58:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711340982105669632
-
Alice Teller (@AliceTeller): No man has ever presumed to control my thoughts, pr
https://t.co/5q3w1Ole43Retweeted Alice Teller (@AliceTeller):
No man has ever presumed to control my thoughts, preferences, life choices or anything else as much as feminists do.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-19 19:58:00 UTC
-
Asians. Lower sexual maturity. Jews. Lower sexual dimorphism. Whites. High sexua
Asians. Lower sexual maturity.
Jews. Lower sexual dimorphism.
Whites. High sexual dimorphism and slightly lower sexual maturity.
Africans lower sexual dimorphism and much higher sexual maturity.
Desert and steppe people are the human disaster areas. High reproduction and aggression with low intelligence and high impulsivity.
We couldn’t domesticate them.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-19 14:56:00 UTC
-
It is very hard to get the full package. For either gender. Pretty Vs fit and cl
It is very hard to get the full package.
For either gender.
Pretty Vs fit and clean.
Feminine. Vs charismatic
Caring and nurturing. Vs careerist and productive.
Positive. Vs gets things done.
Smart (enough) vs smarter.
Not crazy. Vs not impulsive
Not clingy vs not seeking mommy.
Living over here makes American men seem like effeminate losers.
Women ruined America the experiment failed.
Look on the mirror.
That’s why.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-19 13:36:00 UTC
-
I have had some pretty hot secretaries … and they don’t put out. 🙂 it’s the u
I have had some pretty hot secretaries … and they don’t put out. 🙂 it’s the ugly ones that do.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 22:15:41 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710952842140504065
Reply addressees: @BabesGirls
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710892069854822400
IN REPLY TO:
@BabesGirls
Everyone wants a great secretary https://t.co/sdSVjiP50m
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710892069854822400
-
the male/female difference in IQ generally reflects differences in brain size. m
the male/female difference in IQ generally reflects differences in brain size. men are bigger. The differences outside of IQ that matter are interest, on the one hand and verbal vs abstract on the other. we evolved in a division of labor to specialize. It’s not complicated. It is better to think of specialization than superiority and inferiority.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 16:42:00 UTC
-
The same that always have. The same that do today: assortative mating. What is n
The same that always have. The same that do today: assortative mating. What is not occurring is families in lower classes.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 13:20:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710818256622391296
Reply addressees: @retroch
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710811292605542400
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710811292605542400
-
I suggest that we maintain high youth incarceration rates, offer sterilization,
I suggest that we maintain high youth incarceration rates, offer sterilization, regulate immigration, pay women not to reproduce.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 12:30:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710805697940889601
Reply addressees: @retroch
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710794154255712259
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710794154255712259