Theme: Responsibility

  • Westerners pay for the high returns on commons in exchange for every man a sheri

    Westerners pay for the high returns on commons in exchange for every man a sheriff of the commons.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-16 12:54:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1151112756445233153

  • 5) Because emotional burden (expectations) are painful, but not material. Ergo,

    5) Because emotional burden (expectations) are painful, but not material. Ergo, the only solution that does not cascade into even worse conditions is to raise the cost of error so that it does not happen with any regularity. This is the court’s mission in the end.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 13:12:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1149667821539823623

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1149667259071094785


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    4) So, given that the egg-producer must voluntarily give up her eggs (in lieu of crisis) this is rather settled law (not overridden by cultural or popular appeal) under natural law, in that the transfer was involuntary, accidental, the clinic responsible and restitution possible.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1149667259071094785


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    4) So, given that the egg-producer must voluntarily give up her eggs (in lieu of crisis) this is rather settled law (not overridden by cultural or popular appeal) under natural law, in that the transfer was involuntary, accidental, the clinic responsible and restitution possible.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1149667259071094785

  • 4) So, given that the egg-producer must voluntarily give up her eggs (in lieu of

    4) So, given that the egg-producer must voluntarily give up her eggs (in lieu of crisis) this is rather settled law (not overridden by cultural or popular appeal) under natural law, in that the transfer was involuntary, accidental, the clinic responsible and restitution possible.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 13:10:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1149667259071094785

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1149666617489387526


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    3) Intuitively, and probably legally, the egg-producer is the owner of the property assuming one has not invested in (raised the child to the point of its own awareness.) But since we already engage in host birthing, then compensation is possible to the birth mother.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1149666617489387526


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    3) Intuitively, and probably legally, the egg-producer is the owner of the property assuming one has not invested in (raised the child to the point of its own awareness.) But since we already engage in host birthing, then compensation is possible to the birth mother.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1149666617489387526

  • 3) Intuitively, and probably legally, the egg-producer is the owner of the prope

    3) Intuitively, and probably legally, the egg-producer is the owner of the property assuming one has not invested in (raised the child to the point of its own awareness.) But since we already engage in host birthing, then compensation is possible to the birth mother.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 13:07:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1149666617489387526

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1149665604510502913


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    2) Adverse possession: in land disputes you may claim adverse possession (taking of others property) by capital investment in it (maintenance) if it is not against their interests (does not cause harm), is public (visible, known), and for one more more decades (a long time).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1149665604510502913


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    2) Adverse possession: in land disputes you may claim adverse possession (taking of others property) by capital investment in it (maintenance) if it is not against their interests (does not cause harm), is public (visible, known), and for one more more decades (a long time).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1149665604510502913

  • (… continued) Men feel as they do for the simple reason that not all of us are

    (… continued)

    Men feel as they do for the simple reason that not all of us are of merit, but that we must preserve collective care taking while at the same time limiting the reproduction of the undomesticated animal classes who would reverse the past 50K years of evolutionary progress from animal to human.

    Women are the greatest mass murderers in history, since exposure and dumping of babies and children is the most common source of mortality in human history. Men and their wars are nothing by comparison. The great plagues are nothing by comparison. Yet when women and betas like you are able to force costs upon the rest of us, to produce and immigration dysgenia, you no longer limit your reproduction, no longer delay your reproduction, no longer are denied reproduction, no longer face the hard choice of harsh winters or sexual impulse.

    So no. I’s not an ‘opinion’.
    I’m not stating a difference of opinion or value – I’m stating a FACT.
    Dysgenia is measurable.
    The consequences are measurable.

    You are nothing more than a repeat of the jewish-christian-muslim destruction of the ancient world using the same vocabulary arguments and strategy differing only in using pseudoscience and sophism this time versus supernaturalism and sophism the last.

    You and all like you are the source of dark ages.

    You and all like you are a cancer upon this earth – an uncontrolled dysgenic out-of-control, resource consuming disease consuming society, civilization, man, the planet, and the entirety of human potential with your infantilism.

    You and all like you are a disease upon us all.
    A Cancer. A Cancer we are willing to separate from and let run its course.
    But a cancer we must isolate, inoculate, prevent, and cure our people of.

    So when we say ‘be a man’ we mean ‘save yourselves, our people, our civilization, mankind, the planet and the entirety of human potential from that cancerous non-rational infantilized dysenic group we call marxists, socialists, feminists, postmodernists, politically correct, and inadequate.’

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 00:11:03 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425576276514819

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425573316009260


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    (… continued) So you do not know what and why you feel the way you do. You only sense it is a good. The libertarian does not know why he feels the way he does, he only senses it is good. The conservative does not know why he feels the way he does, only that he senses it is good. However, in the long run the conservative is the only one making use of all available knowledge over the long run. Everything liberals thought would be true in their pseudoscientific rage against the darwinian machine has been false. Man was no oppressed. Semi domesticated human animals like all other animals we domesticated, have been eugenically governed in eastern and western civilization – largely through climate, competitors, and manorialism to produce society with superior distributions. ANd your ‘privilege’ of hyperconsumption and violation of the many compromises between the generations, genders, classes, and masculine-feminine minds, was made and still is made, possible by those who domesticated your ancestors – and apparently failed to domesticate your line. What do we do? We are sufficiently wealthy to separate and go our own ways, and return to our process of speciation. You may pursue your dysgenic goals, and we will pursue our eugenic goals, and we will rapidly see what occurs to a ‘liberal, feminine, redistributionist, equalitarian’ order without the libertarians and conservatives striving at all times to preserve what they and their ancestors have made, while you do nothing but continue to overpopulate a planet, drive down the averages, and reduce you and yours to yet another failed effeminate equalitarian utopia. You will not however take us down with you. (We would rather …. revolt and end you.) We will continue to rebuild our society from the catastrophe of century of pseudoscience (marx, freud, adorno, cantor, derrida, chomsky et al) and their marxism, postmodernism, neoliberalism, feminism, and denialism – and we will continue to build ours on the centuries of western tradition (aristotle, hume, darwin, menger, and the common law of reciprocity. So that is what noah and I are talking about. Him about finding happiness in the present, and I about how to solve the political problem of your feminine dysgenic animal desire to reverse our evolutionary progress and turn us to state of animals, ignorance, and poverty. So no it is not an act of GSRRM to state what I have stated. It is a scientific description of the cognitive processes and their dysgenic (herd) outcomes that you seek to implement despite knowing very little, thinking very little, and feeling only what an animal feels. Women feel as they do for the simple reason that at maturity their nervous system develops into a shared one so that they are willing to bear any cost to preserve a costly offspring regardless of merit. (continued…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102425573316009260

  • “Good tort law punishes frivolous lawsuits sufficiently to keep them to a manage

    —“Good tort law punishes frivolous lawsuits sufficiently to keep them to a manageable level. If you want to sue somebody for not warranting their speech you are going to have to warranty the speech you use to accuse them in your lawsuit. … Reciprocity in all things.”—Noah J Revoy


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:33:12 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424719696889043

  • THE SCOPE OF PROPERTARIAN LAW ON TRUTHFUL SPEECH —“One of the counter currents

    THE SCOPE OF PROPERTARIAN LAW ON TRUTHFUL SPEECH

    —“One of the counter currents arguments was that in a Proprietarian system of law. privacy would be wrecked, because everyone would be suing each other for insufficient warranty of speech. So you would constantly have to justify that your speech was as good as it could have been according to your knowledge at the time. It does seem like a high bar no?”— Michael Churchill

    The bar is science, politics, economics, law, education, religion – in other words we avoid it anyway when speaking to one another. the SCOPE is advocacy of HARM.

    What would you want to sue intellectuals, public officials, news media, political activists for when making public speech?

    Both sides of the discourse want the other to stop. My argument is that once they stop they can only negotiate trades, and truthfully so.

    Which as far as I know solves the problem of politics: extension of market demand to all speech.

    In real life people adapt to laws that promote cooperation because its in their interests.

    Law that is enforceable under tort creates good people without state monitoring, interference, or monopoly out of individual and group self interest.

    Tort law is the via negativa market that mirrors the exchange via positiva market. we need both remunerative and restitutionary markets.

    Asymmetries permit abuses. and neutrality remains possible at all times.

    How this affronts privacy when public speech is by definition public not private, is beyond me.

    My understanding is that humans with interest in public affairs will seek education sufficient for truthful discourse, and that the education system will adapt to provide it.

    P-Law does not ask you to produce public speech and be right, only TRUTHFUL AND MORAL by practicing due dilligence sufficient for the demands, claims, or criticisms you are making.

    P teaches us that t is fairly easy to perform such due diligence if we are taught it like grammar and ethics as we were in the past.

    The socialists removed these from education in order to undermine our civlization – by design. We can not only restore these skills to the common people out of their own self defense, but state them in scientific terms and operational logic rather, than religious, traditional, normative and moral .. and in doing so restoring truth, sacredness of the commons, and good citizens ship to our people.

    I think things trough. 😉

    It’s my job. 😉

    -curt


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:32:59 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424718754657778

  • WE DON’T USE THE TERM “FREE WILL” We don’t really use the term ‘Free Will’, beca

    WE DON’T USE THE TERM “FREE WILL”

    We don’t really use the term ‘Free Will’, because it is an ideal, and so tainted that it’s meaningless.

    Instead, we use the terms…
    1. Agency (via positiva) and;
    2. Sovereignty (via negativa) and;
    3. Reciprocity (via voluntary, productive);
    …and we state operationally what those mean.

    If you cant disambiguate it and operationalize it then you don’t understand it.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-07-11 20:22:39 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424678176895590

  • Yes you would. Assuming your disability wasn’t cognitive or psychological …..

    Yes you would. Assuming your disability wasn’t cognitive or psychological ….. in which case, why is your opinion valuable to others? You have protection of the courts. Why do you need the ability to use force (coercion) via voting? In P the court (via negativa) is available.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-06-27 23:08:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1144382094409441283

    Reply addressees: @CitiumZen0n

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1144378487161217025


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1144378487161217025

  • And if chaos reigns, that’s also ok with me. I”m happy to spend the rest of my l

    And if chaos reigns, that’s also ok with me. I”m happy to spend the rest of my life in house-to-house ‘restitution for crimes’.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-06-22 21:35:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1142546676453912577

    Reply addressees: @OrienPermu

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1142546407271927808


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @OrienPermu We can argue over full restoration of the constitution, or devolution of the federal government to the original design of the constitution of several states, or we can simply divide into nation states of our own. That said, one still needs a constitution better than the present.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1142546407271927808


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @OrienPermu We can argue over full restoration of the constitution, or devolution of the federal government to the original design of the constitution of several states, or we can simply divide into nation states of our own. That said, one still needs a constitution better than the present.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1142546407271927808