Curt Doolittle

Theme: Responsibility

  • (FB 1541539548 Timestamp) NO. ANIMALS AND AI’S DON”T HAVE AND CAN’T HAVE RIGHTS.

    (FB 1541539548 Timestamp) NO. ANIMALS AND AI’S DON”T HAVE AND CAN’T HAVE RIGHTS. WE ENACT NEGATIVE RIGHTS TO PROTECT THEM.

  • (FB 1541539548 Timestamp) NO. ANIMALS AND AI’S DON”T HAVE AND CAN’T HAVE RIGHTS.

    (FB 1541539548 Timestamp) NO. ANIMALS AND AI’S DON”T HAVE AND CAN’T HAVE RIGHTS. WE ENACT NEGATIVE RIGHTS TO PROTECT THEM.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1541964384 Timestamp) THE ENEMY DOESN’T REQUIRE INTENT, ONLY FAILURE OF DUE DILIGENCE by John Mark This is massively important. Being sincerely wrong because you didn’t do due diligence (you didn’t study and question your priors sufficiently) is just as destructive as being malicious. And it allows you to be a useful idiot tool in the hands of those who would destroy all we value. This is why I have started telling civnats that still believe in the false religion of equality, “You are my enemy, because you are unwittingly working for my enemy, and until you fix that, I must treat you as an enemy.”

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1541959215 Timestamp) As eli so thoroughly demonstrates, we don’t prosecute you on your intentions alone, but on your failure to perform due diligence. This eliminates the ((())) model under which one can claim innocence of intent under conditions of creating moral hazard, which one then benefits from.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1541958944 Timestamp) WHY ISN’T NEGLIGENT GENOCIDE A CRIME? by Eli Harman If “negligent homicide” is a thing? Why not “negligent genocide?” It’s possible that some misguided fools genuinely believe that a world teeming with “crossbreeds” with no identity and no culture is a good and beautiful thing. I never thought of it that way. I always appreciate the historical accomplishments of Western, meaning white, civilization and mourned their possibly inevitable future loss. I say “possibly inevitable” because when I gave my loyalty to individualist principles, similar to Jordan Peterson’s, I didn’t see any way to prevent it. Nothing to do but make that leap and hope for the best. But we have all the evidence we need now to banish hope. Not one great, city, nation, or civilization has been improved by the inclusion of dependent, third world, hordes. And everywhere the process has gotten suitably advanced is a total disaster. London used to be capital of a great empire. Now it’s the capital of acid attacks. Detroit used to be an unmatched industrial center. Now it’s rotting back into the weeds. Multiculturalism doesn’t lead to “Star Trek.” It leads to Brazil or South Africa. But it turns out that preventing that is a simple matter of abandoning unworkable and undesirable individualist principles. If any fools still don’t understand, it’s because they are willfully ignorant. That is not a valid excuse any longer. All the evidence one needs is readily available. But some of our would-be genociders are not ignorant, misguided, nor foolish. They are deadly serious. For them, “Star Trek” was never the point. Only the destruction of Western Civilization.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1541964384 Timestamp) THE ENEMY DOESN’T REQUIRE INTENT, ONLY FAILURE OF DUE DILIGENCE by John Mark This is massively important. Being sincerely wrong because you didn’t do due diligence (you didn’t study and question your priors sufficiently) is just as destructive as being malicious. And it allows you to be a useful idiot tool in the hands of those who would destroy all we value. This is why I have started telling civnats that still believe in the false religion of equality, “You are my enemy, because you are unwittingly working for my enemy, and until you fix that, I must treat you as an enemy.”

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1541959215 Timestamp) As eli so thoroughly demonstrates, we don’t prosecute you on your intentions alone, but on your failure to perform due diligence. This eliminates the ((())) model under which one can claim innocence of intent under conditions of creating moral hazard, which one then benefits from.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1541958944 Timestamp) WHY ISN’T NEGLIGENT GENOCIDE A CRIME? by Eli Harman If “negligent homicide” is a thing? Why not “negligent genocide?” It’s possible that some misguided fools genuinely believe that a world teeming with “crossbreeds” with no identity and no culture is a good and beautiful thing. I never thought of it that way. I always appreciate the historical accomplishments of Western, meaning white, civilization and mourned their possibly inevitable future loss. I say “possibly inevitable” because when I gave my loyalty to individualist principles, similar to Jordan Peterson’s, I didn’t see any way to prevent it. Nothing to do but make that leap and hope for the best. But we have all the evidence we need now to banish hope. Not one great, city, nation, or civilization has been improved by the inclusion of dependent, third world, hordes. And everywhere the process has gotten suitably advanced is a total disaster. London used to be capital of a great empire. Now it’s the capital of acid attacks. Detroit used to be an unmatched industrial center. Now it’s rotting back into the weeds. Multiculturalism doesn’t lead to “Star Trek.” It leads to Brazil or South Africa. But it turns out that preventing that is a simple matter of abandoning unworkable and undesirable individualist principles. If any fools still don’t understand, it’s because they are willfully ignorant. That is not a valid excuse any longer. All the evidence one needs is readily available. But some of our would-be genociders are not ignorant, misguided, nor foolish. They are deadly serious. For them, “Star Trek” was never the point. Only the destruction of Western Civilization.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542209711 Timestamp) THE ARISTOCRATIC (RESPONSIBILITY) SALES FUNNEL All of the people who start out edgy, tend to move back up the sales funnel (wider audience) because they perceive they are doing more good with wider reach, by driving more people into the sales funnel. Everyone has to move thu the ‘sales funnel’ from well meaning fool to man of agency. I did it and it sure seems like most other men do. “Nice Person” > Social Democracy > Classical Liberalism > Libertarianism > anarcho capitalism > Neo Reaction > Propertarianism > (some version of , fuck it, let’s just impose it.)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542209711 Timestamp) THE ARISTOCRATIC (RESPONSIBILITY) SALES FUNNEL All of the people who start out edgy, tend to move back up the sales funnel (wider audience) because they perceive they are doing more good with wider reach, by driving more people into the sales funnel. Everyone has to move thu the ‘sales funnel’ from well meaning fool to man of agency. I did it and it sure seems like most other men do. “Nice Person” > Social Democracy > Classical Liberalism > Libertarianism > anarcho capitalism > Neo Reaction > Propertarianism > (some version of , fuck it, let’s just impose it.)