Aristocracy’s duty is the service of the interests of our people – not to tolerate their frames. Instead, when necessary, in sheriff, court, sargeant, general, and king, to use the law, and military truth – meaning reporting – meaning testifying to only what is observable. To produce the ONE monopoly we must: preservation of our market from all competition internal and external, foreign and domestic.
And to let you all search for your leadership in your frames outside of law, politics, and war.
Where we made our mistake in opening democracy is letting y’all think that your frames have any value outside of your heads. In matters of law, politics and war, there is no ‘equality’ there is just your silly little frames of reference necessary for you to feel good cooperating with others at whatever scale of agency you possess. Because that’s all they are. Guidebooks for different levels (Grades) of our people, at the ‘reading level’ that they can comprehend, remember, and make use of, without thinking too hard. That’s truthful tough love.
TOUGH LOVE
So what am I doing?
I stopped the lying. I stopped practicing the big lie of the enlightenment – that we are equal. That opinions matter. Tah frames matter. That pandering was helpful to our people. That classes aren’t real or material or genetic. That tripartism and quadripartism weren’t superior to equality.
I speak in the language I’m restoring: the aristocracy: soldier, warrior, sergeant, captain, general, lawmaker, Nobility and King. The language of war: truthful, empirical, scientific, and totally unforgiving. This is hierarchy. So adapt to the language and frame of hierarchy. Economics, Institutions, Law, Politics, War, Strategy, Logistics.
And this is war. War for our race, our civilization, our culture, and our kin. This isn’t a pretense we’re equal as other than kin. This isn’t an exercise in democratic appeal. I’m not trying to make you feel good about your little illusions, like every other democratic panderer.
Democracy is over.
They told you your opinion was worthwhile. It isn’t.
Your value is as kin. And as soldier or warrior.
You can either demonstrate your knowledge or you can’t.
You can demonstrate achievement or you can’t.
You either have a war plan, a constitution for running a government, a means of transition, or even a leadership team ready to manage an empire without time to ramp up on it – or you are jerking off.
All you have to offer is “Yes I am kin, and yes I will show up, and yes I will fight”.
Pandering is over.
The undesirable, the left behind, the cowardly, the disenfranchised, the priestly, the feminine, the middle class, the desperate for leadership NEVER EVER LEAD, and always FAIL. Always. They just rant and gossip and commiserate – and as history shows – do nothing.
( … )
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
IF YOU CAN FIND SOMEONE BETTER, THEN HAVE AT IT. (rant) —“I found him online by listening to a John Mark video. I’ve recently started to notice he seems more into himself and his own status as “super genius “ than helping his fellow wypipo.”— Tiffany Tiffany Well someone actually hit a nerve. 😉 I have them. lol That hurt. I am doing the best I know how to do. Mostly it works. And I’m pretty good at what it is I do – not what you want me to do – which is be a priest with secular christian message of hopefulness that panders to your frame of reference and expectations I play king of the hill games. It is how to teach men by dominance play. It is the best way to teach men, because you do not waste your time on the failures – meanwhile those who have potential can watch and learn until they are able to try. And even when they fail they come back after a year or two once they learn enough to play the game. and that frame is male Meritocracy: Heroism, Excellence. Superiority. And the problem is that this technique is definitely an issue for – Women (equality, terror at losing face) – Christians (equality, pacifism , terror at falsification) – Working, Laboring, Underclass, Undesirable Men who feel left behind. (desperation for peer leadership,on their terms,) 1. And that is because we want collective victory on the terms of our FRAMES. 2. And that is because we all discover and use the FRAMES that reflect our gender, sexual, social, economic, and political, market values. 3. And because (importantly) western civilization provides a market for frames, so we have frames to choose from – despite everyone wanting their frame to take priority. 4. And that is because we all want leaders in our frame – except those FRAMES HAVE ALL FAILED. 5. The West has (Europeans) generally succeeded when rallying all markets for FRAMES against a common enemy, or in pursuit of a common opportunity (indo european expansion, resistance to persia and , greco roman expansion, resistance to islam, arabs, and turks, colonial expansion, world wars, industrial technological market expansion.) Because it is the only time we create a monopoly instead of a market – and this vacillation between monopoly in war, and market in all else is what makes is different, more adaptive, and faster evolving than the rest of mankind. You WANT and all mankind wants MONOPOLY which is only achievable in supernatural or sophomoric or pseudoscientific ignorance, poverty, and equality in ignorance and poverty. This is the muslim religion’ strategy. To drag everyone to the bottom where they are equal in ignorance, poverty and dysgenia. Whereas the CHinese and Indian are merely stagnation, our is continuous competition, adaptation, innovation – and that is why our law is ‘scientific’ and why , as a consequence, we developed reason and science: because markets cannot function by any other means – particularly markets between frames that reflect a hierarchy of abilities. ( … )
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102508110582615842
