4) So, given that the egg-producer must voluntarily give up her eggs (in lieu of crisis) this is rather settled law (not overridden by cultural or popular appeal) under natural law, in that the transfer was involuntary, accidental, the clinic responsible and restitution possible.
Source date (UTC): 2019-07-12 13:10:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1149667259071094785
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1149666617489387526
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
3) Intuitively, and probably legally, the egg-producer is the owner of the property assuming one has not invested in (raised the child to the point of its own awareness.) But since we already engage in host birthing, then compensation is possible to the birth mother.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1149666617489387526
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
3) Intuitively, and probably legally, the egg-producer is the owner of the property assuming one has not invested in (raised the child to the point of its own awareness.) But since we already engage in host birthing, then compensation is possible to the birth mother.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1149666617489387526
Leave a Reply