Theme: Religion

  • THE RESIDUES OF CHRISTIANITY ARE RESIDUES OF ARYANISM Or even better. That those

    THE RESIDUES OF CHRISTIANITY ARE RESIDUES OF ARYANISM

    Or even better. That those myths and that content, was originally greek, roman, and european – and that it was always there even before the church.

    It doesn’t matter what name we call those residues (Pareto called them Residues and Derivations). It isn’t helpful to associate them with the church.

    Those residues and derivations can be stated scientifically, rationally, and mythically. They don’t need the fiction around them at all.

    Rabbinical Judaism was an innovation (reformation) produced from greek ideas.

    Christianity was an innovation (reformation) on judaism produced from greek, roman, and persian ideas.

    What was retained was the 1) the false history to add legitimacy by contrast to the new reformation, 2) the trials of christ story to replace the trials of Achilles story; 3) the underlying argument that the unlanded (poor, ignorant) pastoralists were somehow divine (rather than inferior) to the agrarians and their aristocracy (the strong, wealthy, powerful), 4) the use of all of the above to undermine the aristocracy, commercial, and agrarian society.

    —“when the Christian myths became unbelievable, they left in the minds of even intelligent and educated men a residue, the detritus of the rejected mythology, in the form of superstitions about “all mankind,” “human rights,” and similar figments of the imagination that had gained currency only on the assumption that they had been decreed by an omnipotent deity, so that in practical terms we must regard as basically Christian and religious such irrational cults as Communism and the tangle of fancies that is called “Liberalism” and is the most widely accepted faith among our people today. I am a little encouraged that today some of the more intelligent “Liberals” are at last perceiving that their supposedly rational creed is simply based on the Christian myths they have consciously rejected. I note, for example, that Mary Kenny, who describes herself as “a former radical”, has come to the realization that “so many of the [Liberals’] political ideas… are religious at root. The search for equality in the secular sense is a replacement of the Judaeo-Christian idea that God loves every individual equally… The feelings of guilt or, indeed, pity, which once went into the religious drive, are being transferred to secular ideas to the ultimate destruction of our civilisation.”-Revilo P. Oliver—


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-30 17:06:00 UTC

  • funny how moderns and christians want to attribute meaning to scandinavian symbo

    funny how moderns and christians want to attribute meaning to scandinavian symbols, but the uniqueness of the west is its absence of mysticism and magic. magic was much closer to what we think of as science and medicine, religion much closer to mythology. loading and framing are semitic inventions. we are living in an age of mysticism.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-27 19:14:00 UTC

  • What does this mean for the Indo-European vs Abraham narrative? Cc Alexander Zav

    What does this mean for the Indo-European vs Abraham narrative?

    Cc Alexander Zavialov


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-27 09:43:00 UTC

  • My god? My god is the god of my people. His name? He has many names. But all Tru

    My god? My god is the god of my people. His name? He has many names. But all True Names must be stated in operational language. As such, the true name of my god, is The God Who Works to Transcend My People. Does he exist? Existence requires persistence. He does not persist without my people. He exists as heroes, gods, myths, laws of nature, and numbers exist, by living eternally in the minds of our people – some part here, some part there, some parts everywhere – together creating the whole. So, I know my god’s true name. And I know his gift: transcendence, and I know his compensation: that we speak the truth and demand it of others, that we take nothing not paid for, and demand it of others, that cause others no loss, and demand it of others. These are high costs. He is the most costly of gods. That is why so few can choose to trade with him.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-24 11:29:00 UTC

  • 1) There is only one natural law: reciprocity. 2) Any religion that claims any o

    1) There is only one natural law: reciprocity.

    2) Any religion that claims any other law is both a violation of natural law, and therefore a deception, fraud, theft, and harm to mankind.

    3) No religion that relies on law other than natural law is not then a religion but a political system seeking to displace the current system by fraud, indifferent from seeking to displace the system of natural law by violence.

    4) Any attempt to advocate, apply, or institutionalize any law other than Natural Law is an act of war.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-23 18:15:00 UTC

  • ARE RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY DEAD? WELL, IT DEPENDS – THEY ARE ‘NARROWED” SIGNIFI

    ARE RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY DEAD? WELL, IT DEPENDS – THEY ARE ‘NARROWED” SIGNIFICANTLY

    RELIGION

    No. I’ve spent the past three years on this problem and physicial fitness, mindfulness (mental fitness), myth-literature-history-narrative collections(macro rules), are just as important as recipe-formula-law collections.

    One of the things my work in philosophy has taught me, that this article demonstrates, is that if you can’t describe something in a series (spectrum) then you are very likely making the error of an ideal type (unlmited) instead of a category (limited).

    Ergo, the first discipline must be truthful speech. Science as we understand it consists of the process of performing due diligence prior to publication of our speech.

    Physics like mathematics is just *the simplest* of the disciplines. Whereas for example, economics is much harder, and sentience is much harder than economics.

    PHILOSOPHY

    Philosophy has made very little progress in its unique preoccupation: decidability(truth), consent (good), and choice(preference).

    As far as I know, formal logic was a dead end and a waste of a century.

    If I’m correct, and have produced operational logic(action) to replace verbal logic (meaning), then perhaps we will make some progress in philosophy, and finally separate theology, moral fictionalism, and rhetorical calculation, completing the categorical divergence of Zoroaster/Augustine/Constantinople(supernatural), Socrates/Plato/Greece(ideal), and Aristotle/Zeon/Rome(real).

    And we can finally put Plato and the continentals to bed as we have put theology to bed – forever.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-22 09:24:00 UTC

  • You know, people correct me all the time. But the pattern is obvious: it’s never

    You know, people correct me all the time. But the pattern is obvious: it’s never abrahamists. It’s always scientists.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-20 09:13:00 UTC

  • Spartans talk in Reals, Romans in Virtues, Athenians in Ideals, Jews in Mysticis

    Spartans talk in Reals, Romans in Virtues, Athenians in Ideals, Jews in Mysticism.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-17 21:44:00 UTC

  • TRUTH IS ENOUGH – EVERY ABLE MAN A SHERIFF You cannot win an argument with those

    TRUTH IS ENOUGH – EVERY ABLE MAN A SHERIFF

    You cannot win an argument with those who deny reality. Conservatives cannot win an argument while they cling to supernatural christianity. The only way to win is to abandon all lies, and use violence to create zero tolerance for lies.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-17 11:42:00 UTC

  • IN CHOOSING A GOD, CHOOSE WISELY You choose a god, and by that choice bring him/

    IN CHOOSING A GOD, CHOOSE WISELY

    You choose a god, and by that choice bring him/her into you, and that god will become your conscience – a part of you. (this is scientifically true). Choose your god wisely. As you gain wisdom and need, you may choose another god. (this is true and anti-fragile) All gods have the same power – to know the truth of our thoughts, words, and deeds. All gods speak with us by the same means – by feelings alone. We can all talk to our gods by the same means – by feeling, thought, word and deed. But different gods reach our souls (personality traits) differently, so your conscience will serve you better if you choose the right god for you. (This is scientifically true). We know only one limit: only a demon will claim he is the only god, the greatest of the gods, or that he has dominion over the forces of the universe, and only a man who has taken a demon into him will claim he knows the words of gods – they do not speak – ever. And if you invite one of these demons into you, you will be a danger to yourself, your people, and all mankind – and justly prosecuted for it. (this is true). And anyone who says other than this has taken a demon into himself – pretending to be a god.

    Let a thousand gods, and a thousand temples, like a thousand nations, bloom.

    (Markets in Everything)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-16 09:00:00 UTC