ARE RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY DEAD? WELL, IT DEPENDS – THEY ARE ‘NARROWED” SIGNIFI

ARE RELIGION AND PHILOSOPHY DEAD? WELL, IT DEPENDS – THEY ARE ‘NARROWED” SIGNIFICANTLY

RELIGION

No. I’ve spent the past three years on this problem and physicial fitness, mindfulness (mental fitness), myth-literature-history-narrative collections(macro rules), are just as important as recipe-formula-law collections.

One of the things my work in philosophy has taught me, that this article demonstrates, is that if you can’t describe something in a series (spectrum) then you are very likely making the error of an ideal type (unlmited) instead of a category (limited).

Ergo, the first discipline must be truthful speech. Science as we understand it consists of the process of performing due diligence prior to publication of our speech.

Physics like mathematics is just *the simplest* of the disciplines. Whereas for example, economics is much harder, and sentience is much harder than economics.

PHILOSOPHY

Philosophy has made very little progress in its unique preoccupation: decidability(truth), consent (good), and choice(preference).

As far as I know, formal logic was a dead end and a waste of a century.

If I’m correct, and have produced operational logic(action) to replace verbal logic (meaning), then perhaps we will make some progress in philosophy, and finally separate theology, moral fictionalism, and rhetorical calculation, completing the categorical divergence of Zoroaster/Augustine/Constantinople(supernatural), Socrates/Plato/Greece(ideal), and Aristotle/Zeon/Rome(real).

And we can finally put Plato and the continentals to bed as we have put theology to bed – forever.