Theme: Institution

  • The CEO problem is the same as the bank problem: if a government leaves open a h

    The CEO problem is the same as the bank problem: if a government leaves open a hole in ‘the rules’ then they must either exploit it or be defeated by competitors who exploit it instead. So, it is not a CEO greed problem, it’s a natural consequence of the failure of the state to…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-23 18:16:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749858559049769181

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749858203104326052

  • For our organization, this is probably worth it. 1000 per month isn’t. 500 quest

    For our organization, this is probably worth it. 1000 per month isn’t. 500 quest

    For our organization, this is probably worth it. 1000 per month isn’t. 500 questionably. 200 maybe. 100 certainly. At present we pay the 16 per month. I would really love to be able to afford 1k a month but at present donation levels we cant manage it. (Conservatives don’t… https://t.co/0yOyf5yWOS


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-21 23:07:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749207124540817643

  • hence the cultural and institutional need to suppress it

    hence the cultural and institutional need to suppress it.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-21 18:01:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749130196622389663

    Reply addressees: @cryptodiaries

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749112799614443938

  • A digital standard can be circumvented by credit expansion using a secondary veh

    A digital standard can be circumvented by credit expansion using a secondary vehicle – which is precisely what would happen – just as gold was circumvented with commodity money substitutes.

    Any economy limited to hard money would be incapable of not only competition but survival in a world of markets consisting of those who didn’t use hard money.

    It is also no clear that holders of a money or money subsiute have any right to either purchasing power gained via appreciation of the it or claims of loss claimed by depreciation of it. In fact I’m fairly certain both are unearned – when thy should or could have put thir savings in another vehicle.

    Reply addressees: @rosswcalvin @realJohnVictor


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-21 14:19:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1749074347644391424

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748932250152955958

  • RT @AutistocratMS: @Genophilee @TrueSlazac There aren’t any real Nazis today tho

    RT @AutistocratMS: @Genophilee @TrueSlazac There aren’t any real Nazis today though, it’s outlawed across the West. Capitalism is a sociali…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-21 04:43:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748929273514086726

  • WHAT DOES SETTLED LAW MEAN IN THE CONTEXT OF TRUMP ET AL? Settled law means that

    WHAT DOES SETTLED LAW MEAN IN THE CONTEXT OF TRUMP ET AL?

    Settled law means that the people consider the matter settled and just and as such no longer pursue remedy in court or legislation or worse. The court is chartered with the tradition of ‘keeping the kings peace’ so to speak by producing settled law. If the people and the legislature agree, and the court can find no failure in the construction of the law that violates the constitution, it’s concurrency and common law traditions, with some bias for the natural law per Blackstone, then the court will consider the matter settled.

    However, given that american codification of anglo, germanic, and early european law is (alone in the world) empirical, (scientific) precisely because it is natural, common, and concurrent in construction, all (a) amendments (b) legislation (c) regulation, and (d) findings of the courts are open to revision just as is all scientific theory. (Which is of course why the institutionalization of law and science originated in england).

    So, previously I said that the court is resisting and reversing lawfare, by which the people and the legislatures are bypassed – this is how the activism of the sixties was pushed through against the will of the population, and the due process demanded by the constitution. The reversal of roe v wade the most exemplary.

    In this case the court could easily state that the attempt to deny Trump the ballot in the state is an activism by political wings in the state, and without the consent of the people of the state, which then affects the will of the people of other states. As such, the court would consider this lawfare: attempt to create new law by the court that must be decided either by the constitution and if tolerated by the constitution then by the legislature of the totality of the states – in the case of the presidency.

    So the court will (likely) decide that this is a lack of clarity in the constitution and as such it is a SCOTUS issue. And thankfully SCOTUS is restoring originalism meaning that the text means what it meant at the time of its writing and if it must be altered then that must be a decision for the people and their legislatures not for the court. So in most cases the court is simply applying that logic to any given matter that is of constitutional import rather than legislative conflict or legitimacy.

    How the election is conducted within states is a matter for states, yet that will just as likely soon be limited as well given the corruption of the election process that has been continuous since the early eighteen hundreds at least in immigrant urban centers.

    The court is restoring rule of law and responsibility of the legislature to make good law, and ending discretionary rule. And in this case you’re arguing for discretionary rule by political activists and a questionable judge in a matter of constitutional clarity.

    I can be wrong. It happens. It just doesn’t happen very often.

    Cheers
    CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-19 19:58:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748434892294094848

  • Abrahamic Cults (occult) Are A Populist Veneer Over European Institutions (real)

    Abrahamic Cults (occult) Are A Populist Veneer Over European Institutions (real)
    Our civilization is culturally european, and yes there is some inclusion of the abrahamic METHOD – because it is cheap and easy mythology for children, women, and the lower classes vs the costly learning of the discipline of greco roman philosophy (stoicism, epicureanism), but since “There is nothing good in christianity that was not present in greco roman germanic thought, but there is a great deal that is bad in christianity that is not present in greco-roman-germanic thought” the abrahamic method simply increased the scope of the population that could be domesticated into responsibility for the commons at the cost of dumbing down the population rather than elevating them with reason.
    Otherwise, abrahamism teaches superstition lying and ignorance and infantilization, to make willing subjects, that was finally defeated by the reintroduction of classical thought and the restoration of trade around the germanic core of the atlantic and north and baltic seas.
    That does not mean that christian teaching doesn’t produce the optimum citizen for a highh trust polity – at least in the lower two thirds of the population. But it does mean that abrahamism teaches the falsehood, magical thinking, fictionalization, manipulation, and the art of lying natural to women at industrial scale.

    History of Masculine European vs Feminine Semitic
    1) The abrahamic religions were a revolt against indo european (european-persian) superiority in culture and civilization and technology.
    2) The jewish restoration of the torah was a counter revolution against the greco roman law.
    3) Christianity was a revolt by the primitives of the levant against greco roman reason culture civilization, that left them a decadent impoverished underclass that could not compete.
    4) The Jewish Reformation of Rabbinical Judaism was an attempt to imitate the greco roman schools.
    5) The (byzantine imposition) of christianity by force upon rome was two fold: to turn the aggressive western peasantry into docile levantine serfs; to create a state within a state that would undermine the roman aristocratic government (or what remained of it); and to replace the aristocratic culture with the submissive culture of the east, thus bringing germanic-italic european rome under slavic-syrian rule.
    6) The muslim rejection of christianity and creation of islam as a heresy was a counter revolution against the byzantine conversion of tolerant christianity into eastern roman law so that it was no longer tolerable (adaptable) by the primitive arabs and their neighbors.
    7) Mendelssohn’s reforms were a counter-reaction to the success of anglo common law, french utopian continental law, and german philosophy.
    8) Marx’s new secular theology was reform of jewish feminine communal abrahamic thought in reaction to scientific, economic, and institutional thought.
    9) The rest of the jewish marxist-sequence through the woke is another attempt at creating a feminine submissive rebellion under a feminine authoritarianism against the european escape from it over the past millennium.

    No more semitic feminine dark ages please.

    The semitic vs european competition has always been the superior masculine heroic against the inferior feminine semitic submissive – or what others have called ‘the master vs slave morality’, which is, at its source, the masculine eugenic against the feminine dysgenic.

    No more dark ages.
    We must not let our tolerance of the feminine and it’s pretense of innocence and non aggression creat another horror. This time of pseudoscience and sophistry instead of supernaturalism and sophistry.

    Cheers.

    Reply addressees: @Saurabh_Shah1 @teodoriancu14


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-18 19:42:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748068400117448704

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748061239866228954

  • The strong thesis is that it created a state within the state that as we have se

    The strong thesis is that it created a state within the state that as we have seen here with the marxist-to-woke sequence and as we have seen again with the ‘alien’ population running social media (most social media employees are not ethnic europeans). So the state within a state…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-17 22:31:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1747748425938911710

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1747747807002251613

  • I don’t try to encourage it, I try to find a way to achieve what it does by othe

    I don’t try to encourage it, I try to find a way to achieve what it does by other means. I think I CAN do it, and therefore we CAN do it, but as far as I can tell it takes an institution (education) to pull it off.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-17 21:59:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1747740394203263072

    Reply addressees: @teodoriancu14

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1747738539263938780

  • Yes. The entire organization

    Yes. The entire organization.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-17 10:06:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1747561121257488697

    Reply addressees: @ezra_tezra

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1747542566902305087