Theme: Institution

  • There are very few people that can contribute to our work. He has mastered the s

    There are very few people that can contribute to our work. He has mastered the science, logic, and law and is the only other person able to work with me to write the definitions, descriptions, and prohibitions on the vast scope of means of lying – as well as nearly every other aspect of the work – into law.
    Some people do not seek external validation. He doesn’t. In fact he is quite quiet and unassuming in person. He just knows what he’s talking about. And his knowledge of intellectual history, his understanding of behavioral economics, and his ability to use the method to express those economics is extraordinary.
    One of the best living mathematicians lives with his mother in St Petersburg Russia and just does math. One of the best theoretical physicists lives in a van, and surfs every day. Many of us cannot tolerate the politics of the academy. So this is why we work outside it. And it’s not surprising that in multiple fields, any field that does not require exorbitant funding, that better work is done outside the academy than in.

    Reply addressees: @Womenrising2023 @AutistocratMS @NoahRevoy


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-31 23:08:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752831232176459776

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752829656724627694

  • they are so small in numbers they don’t matter. The world doesn’t need women in

    they are so small in numbers they don’t matter. The world doesn’t need women in those capacities. I won’t even go into the harm women contribute to every organization and every discipline of every kind. That research is just coming out but it’s been obvious since the eighties.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-30 21:42:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752447288973152529

    Reply addressees: @Womenrising2023 @NoahRevoy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752446573756272907

  • Ascentium (Now a division of Avanade and a spin off called Smith Commerce) < Red

    Ascentium (Now a division of Avanade and a spin off called Smith Commerce) < RedTech(Redmond Technology Partners, still small independent) < eXcell Data (Now a Division of Compucom), etc. < and a number of others that have been sold, re-sold, or closed since then and a number of others before then that don’t bear mention, including legal research, funds recovery, office products, and art supplies. 😉

    Reply addressees: @bz_dl_bz


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-30 20:30:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752429045805993984

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752418797057712338

  • That doesn’t stand at all. Not even sure how you got there. Natural law says tha

    That doesn’t stand at all.
    Not even sure how you got there.
    Natural law says that all men can enforce the natural law whether institution or not, and that it is a universal standard. And that it is the product of the universe whether that universe at the hand of a god or not.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-30 16:33:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752369448806133928

    Reply addressees: @_Itsmrfoxy_ @ArmoryOC

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752364261601329197

  • John Mark is back under the brand John Victor, he’s with us and can be seen in h

    John Mark is back under the brand John Victor, he’s with us and can be seen in his videos, in his book, and in our staff meetings.

    As you probably know I don’t waste my time on politicians and political nonsense. I work on strategic problems that change the entire landscape…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-29 05:52:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751845768363745688

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751843618761867406

  • Think in economics and organizing economics and the difficulty of organizing gov

    Think in economics and organizing economics and the difficulty of organizing government, transport, or production on any scale in europe vs in the flood river valleys of the nile, eastern mediterranean, mesopotamia, indus and ganges, or yangtze and yellow rivers.

    The church was captured as a land holding corporation for the nobility and aristocracy because of primogeniture – and the later sons controlling the family land and accumulating more land, and renting the land to peasants, under auspices of the church.

    Given the muslim piracy in the mediterranean, Feudalism was all that was possible until the northern europeans restored trade around the atlantic, north, and baltic seas,and could restore the trade route through lotharingia from the netherlands overland to venice et al.

    The restoration of greek reason as muslim scholars fled to europe after islamic return to fundamentalism and purged greek reason and thought, really took effect by 1200, and by the 1400s invention of the printing press, combined with the muslim closure of the ports of byzantium forcing the development of the age of sail, europe’s isolation was broken and it took over the world.

    Reply addressees: @Lodenkar


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-29 03:38:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751812146248200193

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751434291232342231

  • It should have been obvious because while the first institution of wester civ is

    It should have been obvious because while the first institution of wester civ is law, the fist institution of Sinic civ is the state, just as the first institution of the middle east and india are religion. First institutions always dominate. Africa never got to political…


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-28 20:49:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751709088965177552

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751707284617801817

  • “Why have I never seen Michael before?”– Michael was one of the (large number)

    –“Why have I never seen Michael before?”–

    Michael was one of the (large number) of people that was concerned about visibility with our organization having some negative effect.

    I keep telling people it has the opposite effect. We just advance truth, reciprocity, self determination and responsibility regardless of cost – especially if that cost is that the truth is offensive. Someone has to do it, if we’re going to overcome the present crisis.

    And so we work on policy to protect the people from commercial political academic and activist groups that seek to achieve their ends by false promises and lying. And therefore forcing usall into truthful reciprocal cooperation.

    This turns out, if you simply state it that way, to be pretty much approved by everyone moral. If not then you are dealing with an immoral person and that association is not something good for you, for the organizations, or for the circles you live work and socialize in.

    My position is that Michael, like me, provides evidence that we dominate the leadership of the intellectual spectrum of economic, social, political and legal innovation.

    And while we try to cover the entire spectrum of the individual family social religious political national and civilizational interest, it is important that, even though our work might be very sophisticated and for a smaller audience, the pattern of sophistication in it is also used by everyone else in our organization addressing every other aspect of our lives.

    And so this is proof of our legitimacy and the innovation in our work.


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-28 02:50:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1751437438356959232

  • Same exact concept just action vs institution terms

    Same exact concept just action vs institution terms


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-25 02:05:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750339161809182790

    Reply addressees: @SaitouHajime00

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750335153552179233

  • CEO DURABILITY? (IT’S ALMOST HALVED) –CURT: Q: “What is the average duration of

    CEO DURABILITY? (IT’S ALMOST HALVED)
    –CURT: Q: “What is the average duration of employment for the CEO of a fortune 1000 company?”–

    The average duration of employment for CEOs, particularly in large companies like those in the Fortune 1000, has been a subject of study and analysis. Based on the available data, the tenure of CEOs has shown a trend of fluctuation over time with a general decrease in recent years.

    Recent Trends (As of 2023)
    The average tenure of CEOs in 2023 is approximately 7.2 years, marking a 34% decrease compared to 2017​​.
    In the context of the S&P 500, the average tenure and ages of departing CEOs were higher in recent years (10.2 years in 2022, age 62.6) compared to previous periods, but these figures have started to normalize​​.

    Historical Perspective
    Historically, the median tenure of a CEO has been around five years, with a notable percentage (19%) of CEOs remaining in position for 10 or more years over the past two decades​​.

    A study by Korn Ferry reported that the average tenure for CEOs dipped to 6.9 years in 2019, down from 8.0 years in 2016​​.

    A longer-term perspective reveals that the median tenure for CEOs was steadily decreasing, with averages dropping from 10 years in 2000, to 8 years in 2016, and approaching 5 years in more recent times​​.

    These trends reflect changes in the business environment, including increased accountability, rapid technological advancements, market volatility, and evolving consumer demands.

    Cheers
    -CD


    Source date (UTC): 2024-01-24 21:34:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1750270991098392576