Theme: Institution

(NLI Internal)
Staff Meeting Notes

Our Mission Needs A Bit of Reframing To Tie It Together
Mission:
Preserving the innocence of children (via Bryan) – so that they learn continuous agency so that they are least influenced by base incentives to overcome agency, and engage in irresponsibility because it is costly – and instead directing their energy and potential (reallocating capital) to benefits to self and commons by the production of capital rather than the export of risk. Innocence, joy, and wonder are directed toward the production of any form of capital instead of the satisfaction of animal impulse by the process of consumption of capital. (Limiting exposure to competitive pressures that would compromise their competitive fitness for maturing into a person responsible within an advanced high, trusted society and its resulting benefits. Western fitness maximizes both scale and velocity.)
Preserving the sanctity of the sexes in their capacities.
Preserving the sanctity of the priority of the family
Preserving (what are social and political?)
Basically, shepherding responsibility at all scales and in pursuit of a high trust commons that limits cooperation and its fruits.
NOTE: the purpose is to steward humans in relation to their maturity and, therefore, responsibility curve.

The Hate Issue Arises From Persistent Injustice Leading to Anger Over The Above (via bryan)
( … )
Injustice against children least able to defend against it (vulerability), is the most angering offense of all.
The more we have injustice the more we have anger produce hate in the world. But the problem is the meaning of injustice, because the left has appropriated the term – so that the left claims it’s feminine deprivation (inquality expaning burden to others) vs masculine harm (imposition of costs by others on one).

Taking On the Responsibility for the Leviathan (via Bryan)
( … )

The Warriors Aren’t The Problem (via Luke)
The warriors are aware they have no insurers (backing them up in lawfare and canceling etc). We aern’t experiencing men in a state of fear but of demorialization and discouragement. Men requrie a license to be dangerous in defense of the common good, and especially defending the good people from the bad – because there are bad people even if the ‘badness’ of bad people is due to their incapacity for self regulation whether their fault a parent’s fault or trauma.

Extra-Judicial Jusice: Warriors Exist (Where the Government Fails But Isn’t The Target (via Noah)
Example: ARC: Association for the (forcible) Recovery of Children. – Via Brandon.
(Tip: Restore Common Law Courts. Restore the Authority of the Sherrif. Restore the Posse for Small Scale. Restore the Militia for Scale – for ‘citizens’ under the terms we have defined in the reforms.)

You May Not Be Equipped For The Warriors – But You Can Defend Them ( via Noah)
( … )

Women Need to Feel Oppressed, or Threatened In Order to Fight (via Curt)
( … )

The People and the Court Need a Means of Testing Whether People are ‘Bad People’ Whether Individuals or Groups.
We provide it with our work on the formal logic of natural law. In fact, we’re the best at providing that decidability. And we’re not afraid to explain thei hierarchy of incentives and the common interests whether informal or conspiratorial so that we seek to ‘solve the problem completely’. The law considers responsibilty, Blame(fault), Liability (restitution), AND .. prevention by the actors AND prevention of others (scale).
The false promise of the end of scarcity and the infinity of resources including human resources capable of making decisions that affect the lives of others.
It’s clear that the surpluses are exhausted and the end of scarcity was a false promise.

The First Problem We Must Solve Remains The Same, Making It Illegal To Suppress Public Speech, and Cancel without Court Action (The Second Is Baiting Into Hazard and Asymmetric Ethical Claims)
( … )

We Cannot Reach Sexual Equality Because We Are Vastly Unequal At Scale
( … )

The Cognitive Reframe
Responsibility hiearchy of child (self) > woman(social) > man(political) compatibility over time as a concrete group, instead of equality in time for individuals as an abstract group. Also the false promise of majoritarianism as necesary or useful rather than concurrency between those demonstrably capable of responsibility.

Semitic Asymmetric and Particular Ethics vs European Symmetric and Universal Ethics
( … )

Statements:
– Small towns initiative a universal. (but we still need cities so that the hyperconsumptive can exit the towns).
– Outlaw means outside of the protection of the law. Meaning open season on the individual our group and their assets.
– In our constitution we have expanded letters of marque such that they can be issued by a governor or sherriff. A sherffif is not envorcement as much as rights protection (add to constitution). The sherriff is the end point. In other words the sherrif is the judge of last resort for taking actions against the public, and the sherriff is above the rest of all the government action against citizens. as such just as the monarchy is the judge of last resort in matters at the top, the sheriff is the judge of last resort in matters at the bottom enforcing the law. Again, within the law. But to do so requrires they are elected, citizens, and bound by the natural law and the constitution even if not by legislation or regulation.
– We’re persuing the anna karinenna strategy.
– What can we learn from the methods of ARC above.

Questions
Q: Is it true that the majority of HOmeland security funds go to jewish organizations?