Theme: Institution

  • THE MARKET DEMAND FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY RELIGION 1. The market demand for per

    THE MARKET DEMAND FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY RELIGION

    1. The market demand for personal mindfulness (Spiritualism) whether empathic-femining (theological), moral-masculine(rational), or analytic-masculine(scientific) exists, and all three demands exist for most of us. The question is, given how the various religions solved mindfulness (Stoicism-epicureanism, buddhism, hinduism, abrahamism) which produces agency (stoicism), which produces optimism (hinduism), which produces withdrawal from reality (buddhism) and which denies and escapes reality (abrahamism).

    2. Religions must provide interpersonal mindfulness by creating a standard dialog, set of signals, and manners that are costly to learn and practice, but that by practicing display to others you are worthy of honest cooperation on the same terms.

    3. Religions must also provide social mindfulness (limitation of fear and comfort in the ethical, and moral. These are moral rules that serve the group’s competitive strategy – and all reflect the environmental challenges of the age of transformation in which men invented religions.,

    4. Religions must also provide political mindfulness (limits on political action and on rulers actions). I won’t cover each of them here.

    5. Religions must also provide a group strategy – gypsy parasitism, jewish parasitism, muslim parasitism, predation and conquest, christian undermining of the truth, knowledge, reason, law, property, aristocracy by rallying the peasantry and women and slaves against all and being as expansionary as islam – to counter islam. Buddhist submission and obedience Hindu class duty and function in the ‘harmony’. Chinese hierarchical family (bureaucracy). Anglo aristocratic egalitarianism (entrepreneurship and corporation).

    So 1. personal mindfulness (peace of mind), 2. interpersonal, 3. social, 4. political, 5. strategic.

    All of these are served by training in stoicism and epicureanism(realism, naturalism, reciprocity, living within your means, surrounding yourself with family and friends, and insulation from competitive status signaling), training interpersonal reciprocity, social reciprocity, training in political reciprocity, and training in group strategic reciprocity.

    The fact that we train people in reading, writing, arithmetic, mathematics, and the sciences, and indoctrinate them into falsehoods of marxism (class undermining), feminism(male undermining), and postmodernism (group undermining), but DON”T train them in stoic mindfulness, epicurean happiness, basic money, household finance, and accounting, basic law of contract and reciprocity, the testimony, the grammars, logics, rhetoric, and produce holidays that celebrate our seasons and heroes, thinkers, and sants is just a choice.

    The only addiction christianity adds is the transformation of western paternalism of masculine aristocracy, to the feminine submission to a false god, the pretense of equality of all, and the one good thing: the feminine emulation of jesus in the extension of forgiveness instead of semitic hypersensitivity to insult and slight – we call this christian love. It’s just self virtue signaling in exchange for immunity from offense by petty people endemic among the desperate, poor and ignorant.

    The real reason people rely on abrahamic religion is to disintermediate themselves from others status signals so that theyc an preserve mindfulness and self image despite continuous rejection. The reason we want to live in the christian world is because we are not subject to continuous rejection but continuous tolerance and forgiveness (love).

    The program of the marxists, feminists, and postmodernists, is to UNDERMINE christian love from within. Undermine the faith. Undermine the ethics Generate envy and hatred between genders, classes, and identity groups, in order to sew discord that creates demand for an authoritarian state which can extract almost unlimited income from the population to resolve the conflicts that the government created.

    This is all you need to understand about (a) religion, (b) christianity in politics (c) how we can state christianity in legal terms, (d) how we can teach stoicism and epicureanism and history and truth rather than semitic lies, and (e) how we are undermined because christians will not fight the enemy.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 12:38:00 UTC

  • “NOTHING ELSE REALLY DEFINES ALTERNATIVES WITH ACTIONABLE SOLUTIONS.” (worth rep

    “NOTHING ELSE REALLY DEFINES ALTERNATIVES WITH ACTIONABLE SOLUTIONS.”

    (worth repeating)

    —“Millenials and Gen Z are mad that we have no community, society, fair ratio of marriageable women, reason to invest at all. Most of us would trade what we have now for communism, anarchy or any number of flawed systems.

    Philosophically speaking, fight club or the joker are more compelling than most or the abstract appeals pitched at us in the past 50 years. Except for P. Nothing else really defines or offers appealing alternatives with actionable solutions.”— @[100027748725265:2048:GL Sevier]Updated Oct 22, 2019, 11:22 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 11:22:00 UTC

  • NATURAL LAW ON MARRIAGE – FOR THE INTERESTED Marriage is a private contract yes,

    NATURAL LAW ON MARRIAGE – FOR THE INTERESTED
    Marriage is a private contract yes, but it is insured by the community, because of the consequences of broken families placing a burden via moral… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=489932184937010&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 02:00:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186462228381343745

  • NATURAL LAW ON MARRIAGE – FOR THE INTERESTED Marriage is a private contract yes,

    NATURAL LAW ON MARRIAGE – FOR THE INTERESTED

    Marriage is a private contract yes, but it is insured by the community, because of the consequences of broken families placing a burden via moral hazard on the community. So, a marriage contract consists (under natural law) as partnership (not corporation) constructed by the mutual exchange of powers of attorney limited only by those limitations stated, but insured by the polity, and therefore the law (judiciary), against interference that would cause harm unrestitutable harm to family members. As such interference in a marriage exposes one to liability for (very large) damages. And distribution of fault is determined court if not determined by the parties. There is no community property. The children are not property but the insurer of the children, and the polity from the children like any other domesticated animal. The law can have no position on divorce, other than empirical, which is that immature children are the responsibility of the mother in the event of a divorce. Mature children may decide which to live with if parents accept their responsibility as insurer. Upon maturity (puberty) that decision belongs to the children. But no liability exists in either direction. That means no alimony, no child support. Because marriages are transitory, and while a woman may sell her sex, affection, and caretaking the man must sell his productivity.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 22:00:00 UTC

  • 10) Anyway, those are the primary differences, and they end creative legislation

    10) Anyway, those are the primary differences, and they end creative legislation, creative regulation, creative adjudication, sloppy authoring of all of the above, and they end the entire marxist, postmodern, feminist, effort to repeat the destruction of the ancient world, here.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 21:10:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186389319088529409

    Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186388932193374209


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays 9) You might think passing tests of truthful speech in court regardless of the context is difficult but once you understand the P-method and particularly the grammars it isn’t hard at all. It’s a checklist. And every item in the checklist is testable before a jury.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1186388932193374209


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays 9) You might think passing tests of truthful speech in court regardless of the context is difficult but once you understand the P-method and particularly the grammars it isn’t hard at all. It’s a checklist. And every item in the checklist is testable before a jury.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1186388932193374209

  • 7) … including education, academy, media, state, financial, commercial, advert

    7) … including education, academy, media, state, financial, commercial, advertising, sectors, and prohibits any religion violating natural law and christian ethics (both of which are scientifically stated). Meaning that anyone attempting to undermine western civ is liable.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 21:06:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186388306772275200

    Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186387859454021632


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays 6) Part 5 above eradicates pseudoscience-innumeracy, sophism-idealism, and supernaturalism-occult, and in particular the Abrahamic technique of Undermining civilization used in Marxism(class), Feminism(gender), Postmodernism(identity), and denialism(truth) in public speech…

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1186387859454021632


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays 6) Part 5 above eradicates pseudoscience-innumeracy, sophism-idealism, and supernaturalism-occult, and in particular the Abrahamic technique of Undermining civilization used in Marxism(class), Feminism(gender), Postmodernism(identity), and denialism(truth) in public speech…

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1186387859454021632

  • 4) P-Law: property defined by demonstrated interest (bearing a cost or opportuni

    4) P-Law: property defined by demonstrated interest (bearing a cost or opportunity cost in order to obtain an interest) regardless of its constitution – so institutions, traditions etc are commons defensible in court. ie: no state consumption of cultural commons.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 21:00:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186386897507180544

    Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186385863586078721


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays 2) P-contract requires strict construction from P-Reciprocity, including all findings, contracts, regulation, legislation and command.
    3) P-Law: No disintermediation of the people from matters of the commons, no insulation of judges, govt, state from suit. (Think Class Action).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1186385863586078721


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays 2) P-contract requires strict construction from P-Reciprocity, including all findings, contracts, regulation, legislation and command.
    3) P-Law: No disintermediation of the people from matters of the commons, no insulation of judges, govt, state from suit. (Think Class Action).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1186385863586078721

  • (from elsewhere) yep. any country can be great if it first creates a good discip

    (from elsewhere)

    yep. any country can be great if it first creates a good disciplined nationalist military that then produce a judiciary, that then produces a government, that then produces a market, that then funds commons. People think it’s the other way around. it isn’t. Its military on down. One step at a time.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 14:47:00 UTC

  • FB BLOCK Curt is on 24hr Facebook block for Post on differences in male and fema

    FB BLOCK

    Curt is on 24hr Facebook block for Post on differences in male and female anti-social behavior and our failure of law and institutions to adapt to changes in them. I suspect if he’d just used ‘male’ and ‘female’ rather than crazy-___ and crazy-___ it would have been fine – but he was trying to add humor I suspect.

    The “Stalkers” are still trying to get Curt banned on facebook, by submitting multiple posts and hoping that the editors don’t understand what he’s arguing for.

    Curt doesn’t do hate or hate speech. He explains incentives and explains the data. But that doesn’t mean that the casual editor can’t be misled into thinking otherwise.

    – The Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 20:01:00 UTC

  • FRANCE VS USA VS JAPAN —“Working time. In France, the legal length of the work

    FRANCE VS USA VS JAPAN

    —“Working time. In France, the legal length of the working week is 35 hours in all types of companies. The working day may not exceed 10 hours.”—

    This strategy is… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=487920221804873&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 13:31:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185549008187592704