Curt Doolittle

Theme: Institution

  • None of that really holds up given that in history 70% of women reproduced and 3

    None of that really holds up given that in history 70% of women reproduced and 30% of men. So throughout history reproduction has been asymmetric.Marriage evolved to control conflcit, property and responsibility for offspring, thereby shielding the population from hazard of care.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 20:12:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188548985516113923

    Reply addressees: @OfSalamis

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188548270810980352

    IN REPLY TO:

    @OfSalamis

    @curtdoolittle 1. 1 egg, 1 sperm.

    2. 1 egg – 1 mother; 1 sperm – 1 father

    3. Any more or less than 1&1 of each parent is non-ideal for offspring

    4. Ideal family unit is most common and accepted, generation by generation.

    5. Conjugal love is undivided and exclusive. CCC #1645

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188548270810980352

  • THe British and American failure was not creating a house of labor, and a house

    THe British and American failure was not creating a house of labor, and a house of family instead of destroying the house of indusry (commons) by diluting it, and letting the church fall to the marxist academy. Same mistake George made when not giving the Colonies a House each.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 18:04:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188516887694577664

    Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188516553798701056

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays Brits need to get over the monarchy thing because the monarchy (judge of last resort, the military), a house of lords (defense of heritage, tradition, and way of life), a house of commons (business), and church (house of the family) is the optimum government under rule of law.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188516553798701056

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays Brits need to get over the monarchy thing because the monarchy (judge of last resort, the military), a house of lords (defense of heritage, tradition, and way of life), a house of commons (business), and church (house of the family) is the optimum government under rule of law.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188516553798701056

  • Brits need to get over the monarchy thing because the monarchy (judge of last re

    Brits need to get over the monarchy thing because the monarchy (judge of last resort, the military), a house of lords (defense of heritage, tradition, and way of life), a house of commons (business), and church (house of the family) is the optimum government under rule of law.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 18:03:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188516553798701056

    Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188516155390074882

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays … began the long march from the restoration of the law from monarchical usurpation, to the reconstruction of usurpation under ‘democratic’ governments, and our present attempt at restoration of the law (market for suppression of parasitism) from democratic governments.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188516155390074882

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays … began the long march from the restoration of the law from monarchical usurpation, to the reconstruction of usurpation under ‘democratic’ governments, and our present attempt at restoration of the law (market for suppression of parasitism) from democratic governments.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188516155390074882

  • And a careful student of the english and anglo saxon law versus the napoleonic a

    And a careful student of the english and anglo saxon law versus the napoleonic and continental law will reveal that we (aglos) have always had such rights of appeal, until the industrial revolution when the state granted commerce freedom from liability for pollution. And…

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 18:00:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188515786387873799

    Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188515412260077569

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays This means we de-politicize, and restore truthful and moral speech in matters of the commons. Or in very reductive legal terms, it means extending the involuntary due diligence, warranty, and liability against fraud and harms from the commercial Market to the Market for commons.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188515412260077569

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays This means we de-politicize, and restore truthful and moral speech in matters of the commons. Or in very reductive legal terms, it means extending the involuntary due diligence, warranty, and liability against fraud and harms from the commercial Market to the Market for commons.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188515412260077569

  • Anyone can propose a contract just like anyone can propose legislation today. Ju

    Anyone can propose a contract just like anyone can propose legislation today. Just as present and past we have multiple organizations that can filter proposed legislation, and minimum support to bring it before the juries of the houses (instead of legislatures) it’s a choice.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 17:44:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188511853653168129

    Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188506290336780288

    IN REPLY TO:

    @directdemocrac7

    @curtdoolittle @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays Ok, you replace statute-law with ‘Contracts of the Commons’.
    What initiates a new contract, or change of an existing one?
    (Currently: Political parties suggest them.)
    Who creates / amends them? (‘Parliament’, jury…?)
    What is the dispute process?
    Thx.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188506290336780288

  • Brits incorrectly criticize american litigation, but it’s precisely this litigat

    Brits incorrectly criticize american litigation, but it’s precisely this litigation – use of the court to constrain the state – that has given us more insulation than europe,but not ENOUGH insulation. We must restore our markets for voluntary cooperation, AND conflict resolution.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-27 17:09:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188503078712029190

    Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1188502802324246529

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays … those Acts of the Commons (Contracts of the Commons) can exist, and Legislation is permanently outlawed, and even regulation must past reciprocity and can be disputed.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188502802324246529

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @directdemocrac7 @Nalo_Nei @JohnMarkSays … those Acts of the Commons (Contracts of the Commons) can exist, and Legislation is permanently outlawed, and even regulation must past reciprocity and can be disputed.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1188502802324246529

  • TRUTH ABOUT HUMAN BEINGS People are rational actors acting in their rational sel

    TRUTH ABOUT HUMAN BEINGS

    People are rational actors acting in their rational self interests, that observe the minimum conformance to rule, procedure, norm, tradition, regulation, legislation, and law, necessary to preserve their status in the social order. Period. End of Story. Good luck falsifying it.

    People are not good, ethical, or moral. They are amoral. They discover what is in their self interest within the environmental limits and congratulate themselves for the content of their character (self image).

    This is the empirical evidence from all people in all cultures, in all countries, in all civilizations, across all of history.

    The civilization of man was performed by the incremental provision of incentives to find self congratulation in minimum accomodation of the various systems of rules, by the incremental evolution of law, norm, and custom to suppress as many opportunities for bad, unethical, immoral, conduct as affordable by the polity, and where incentives are possible to construct. Hence the necessity of sheriffs and policemen and populations increased in anonymity.

    We must govern amoral humans because all are amoral.

    Ergo we must govern pessimistically so that we continuously evolve the suppression of irreciprocity (the bad, unethical, immoral) as quickly as we evolve new methods of bad, unethical and immoral behavior.

    Optimism is why progressive governments fail.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 20:20:00 UTC

  • WE ARE GOING TO NATIONALIZE THE FED WITHIN TWO YEARS. No. Really. We are. … Pr

    WE ARE GOING TO NATIONALIZE THE FED WITHIN TWO YEARS. No. Really. We are. … Promise.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-24 14:36:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187377204205887488

    Reply addressees: @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187373187820130306

    IN REPLY TO:

    @realDonaldTrump

    The Federal Reserve is derelict in its duties if it doesn’t lower the Rate and even, ideally, stimulate. Take a look around the World at our competitors. Germany and others are actually GETTING PAID to borrow money. Fed was way too fast to raise, and way too slow to cut!

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187373187820130306

  • It’s uncommon knowledge that the origin of all customary and political law is th

    It’s uncommon knowledge that the origin of all customary and political law is the resolution of disputes between families or clans, because of the excessive cost and consequence of retaliation cycles (feuds). As such, the polity insures peaceful settlement w/ law, court, jury.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 18:35:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187074962483568645

    Reply addressees: @fryskefilosoof

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1187074362400268288

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @fryskefilosoof I don’t understand… wait… Reciprocity: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests, insured by, and settled by, the court and sheriffs, by forcible restitution, punishment, prevention, and prohibition on further retaliation by parties.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1187074362400268288

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @fryskefilosoof I don’t understand… wait… Reciprocity: productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer of demonstrated interests, insured by, and settled by, the court and sheriffs, by forcible restitution, punishment, prevention, and prohibition on further retaliation by parties.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1187074362400268288

  • WHY DO ANGLO GOVERNMENTS LAST SO LONG? It’s just much easier to reform a contrac

    WHY DO ANGLO GOVERNMENTS LAST SO LONG?

    It’s just much easier to reform a contract (constitution) that is adjudicated by an independent judiciary, than it is to reform a dictatorship, oligarchy, bureaucracy, or theocracy that lacks an independent judiciary and constitutional means of decision making given a division of powers, and fundamental rights especially to property.

    Most of western history is the difficulty in maintaining our rule of law from attempts to usurp it by the aristocracy, the theocracy, the burghers, and now the underclass communists, devoted, and socialists.

    A constitution if well written is an algorithm for the operation of a polity under falsification, tested before judges who are not involved in the operations of whatever function is in conflict.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-23 18:25:00 UTC