Theme: Incentives

  • Incentives: The State Always Acts To Preserve The Illusion of Power

    Incentives: The State Always Acts To Preserve The Illusion of Power.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-13 17:07:00 UTC

  • Half true. Ex: Demand for masculinity changes with economic conditions, and affe

    Half true. Ex: Demand for masculinity changes with economic conditions, and affects everything, incl: fashion, repro., mate sel.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-11 14:25:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/896014662977847296

    Reply addressees: @JayMan471

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/895966471813255168


    IN REPLY TO:

    @JayMan471

    @curtdoolittle Selection acts on individuals and close kin only. Lots of things change, not just endocrine expression.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/895966471813255168

  • All avoidance of innovation comes at the expense of the consequences of innovati

    All avoidance of innovation comes at the expense of the consequences of innovation, and all innovations come at the expense of alternative innovations.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-10 10:41:00 UTC

  • “This is why I love capitalism. It knows no race. It has no sacred cows. Jacob Z

    –“This is why I love capitalism. It knows no race. It has no sacred cows. Jacob Zuma and his Gupta Family goons hire a British PR firm to do a hit job in South Africa. The job involves stoking what critics call “racial tensions” to distract from Zuma’s PR problems. Naturally, the white moguls who support his enemies are furious. But as I have said elsewhere: the biggest threat to racism, racists and nationalists is pure capitalism.”— Ayelam

    It’s true. Although the biggest threat to evolution is universalism. Each of us must pay for our own demographic domestication. otherwise, I’m sorta in the “Yeah, I understand the racism thing”. I just prefer we all carried our own water so that we all got along. And as far as I know, capitalism says ‘carry your own water’. The problem is, universalism says the opposite. Ergo, nationalism = capitalism: carrying your own water. I fucking hate racism so my only solution is nationalism.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-08 11:53:00 UTC

  • I DETERMINE BUBBLES BY THE OFFERINGS COMING TO MARKET, MARKETING PROSE, SALES PI

    I DETERMINE BUBBLES BY THE OFFERINGS COMING TO MARKET, MARKETING PROSE, SALES PITCHES, WHO IS SAYING WHAT, AND SO ON – not financial measures.

    I use asymmetries of knowledge and value. In other words, I measure by what other people are NOT measuring. (This is also what soros does.) Why? Because markets head toward disequilibrium then correct during shocks. The harder the currency the less disequilibrium before corrections. The looser the currency the more disequilibrium before corrections. The problem with the current monetary system is that we cannot insure sectors experiencing shocks without increasing the disequilibrium of the unaffected sectors. Although I know how to fix that it’s not a good thing.

    Someone just showed me a NYC tech fair. I follow most of the new product blogs and sites. I mean, the major players are total f-ck ups (microsoft, and apple). The near monopoly of advertising between fb and google is creating a regulatory certainty that will define the next generation. And amazon is doing more damage to the local economies than did the generations of department stores, then malls, then big box stores – and creating tax and monopoly problems there too.

    Meanwhile we have $2M ranch houses in SF, the catastrophic failure of large numbers of tech companies, and all tech innovation seems to be nothing but fashion redecorating of the past generation of applications combined with marketing.

    Meanhile underinvestment in infrastructure, underinvestment in improving business software, and overinvestment in tablets and handhelds continues.

    I have been predicting this crash and the long term consequences forever. I said that the crash would happen in 08, that the effects would last through 14, that we would have another correction around 17, and that we would see a generational upheaval in 2020 to 2025. I was really, really wrong on china. I still don’t freaking understand china. I just don’t know how they are getting away with it. It must be so much more hugely inefficient a system with so much excess but willingly desperate labor that I can’t model it in my head.

    So as far as I know, this is going to suck.

    My hope is that we get a trifecta of the economy, overseas warfare, attempted impeachment, or maybe zuckerberg running for president, and that this combination creates sufficient anxiety to demand a revolution.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-07 11:59:00 UTC

  • (sketch. want to show how marrying the state undermines all marrriage and family

    (sketch. want to show how marrying the state undermines all marrriage and family options by providing a circumvention of the necessary compromise between the genders)

    I have a pre-monogamous philosophy of the family, in that I have no problem paying for and raising another man’s children – none at all, nor another man paying for and raising mine. In fact, as a man, I see the polity as my tribe and all men share responsibility of defending, growing and improving the tribe, and that all the women and children in it belonging to our men, and we divide up the defense, financing, labor, and training of women and children in exchange for the voluntary care and sex of the woman. Of course, in the end, I give greater preference to my children, but this is my form of ‘communalism’. And it requires only that I create the sovereignty that prevents the taking of the proceeds of my production, and thereby prohibiting me from exchanging those proceeds for my caretaking.

    The consequences of this reciprocal insecurity are greater defense of any marriage – the woman in the short term and the man in the longer term.

    As long as I can do this all family choices are available. If not then men are just slaves to the state with no safety in old age from the security of family care. Men mature later, adapt less easily, accumulate cellular damage on behalf of women and children, and die earlier for it, in exchange for higher productivity during their shorter working lives.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-07 09:05:00 UTC

  • IS YOUR MORAL ARGUMENT BY REVENUE, INCOME, OR BALANCE SHEET? Whenever people cla

    IS YOUR MORAL ARGUMENT BY REVENUE, INCOME, OR BALANCE SHEET?

    Whenever people claim some policy or value is good, ask them whether they mean a sales and revenue report, an income statement, or a balance sheet.

    1 – Revenue Report

    Money In the Door (liberal / female )

    Ooooh, look what I have to spend!

    2 – Income Statement

    Money In Minus Expenses Out (libertarian – ascendant male)

    Oh, maybe I have something left to save or invest?

    3 – Balance Sheet

    Assets minus Liabilities after Income and Expenses

    (Conservative – Mature Male)

    Hmm…. In the end, after all is said and done we’re still losing capital due to depreciation and unproductivity.

    In other words, are they using full accounting (balance sheet), or are they *cherry-picking*?

    Because a conservative includes genetic, social, institutional, and normative capital in his calculations. A libertarian is selective about it. And a liberal treats it as someone else’s problem.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-07 08:01:00 UTC

  • How are they not universal? They depend only on sufficient wealth to satisfy inc

    How are they not universal? They depend only on sufficient wealth to satisfy increasingly marginal preferences.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-07 05:16:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/894427047312977920

    Reply addressees: @jointstocksodom @comeonpeopleV_V

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/894380253975642114


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/894380253975642114

  • All organizations capable of generating rents will maximize all rent opportuniti

    All organizations capable of generating rents will maximize all rent opportunities.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-04 08:41:00 UTC

  • “The black conservatives’ critiques of leftism are correct: leftists are emotion

    —“The black conservatives’ critiques of leftism are correct: leftists are emotional children mentally dominated by the desire for the state to make up for their own lack of capital(of all kinds). What the conventional color blind right fails to see is that while not all members of group x utilize the group evolutionary strategy as is the norm in group x, the vast majority DO use that strategy. If group X’s strategy is parasitic, it becomes necessary to exclude members of group x, regardless of personal merit. People are both individuals AND members of groups.”— Ryan Williams


    Source date (UTC): 2017-08-02 16:27:00 UTC