@JerryBruceD Dunno. Lack of clarity that relies on interpretation, can produce interpretation that is unintended due to that lack of clarity. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-05 03:03:01 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107222229446579286
Theme: Grammar
-
Again, and I have to make everything in every discipline commensurable by making
Again, and I have to make everything in every discipline commensurable by making it constructible from first principles (first causes). https://t.co/1A7ms9zfaA
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 21:52:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456378831242240001
-
So, when I say ‘universally commensurable paradigm, first principles, vocabulary
So, when I say ‘universally commensurable paradigm, first principles, vocabulary, logic, and grammar’ it means reorganizing our concepts to share the same first principles. That first principle is evolutionary computation, sex as the max difference, rate of adaptation.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 21:51:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456378521593516033
-
The Reason For Technical Verbosity 😉
The Reason For Technical Verbosity 😉 https://t.co/Ji5jRoSooL
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 17:42:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1456315951209754630
-
THE VERBOSITY OF THE ONLY WAY TO BE SURE — “I agree with your assessment. But,
THE VERBOSITY OF THE ONLY WAY TO BE SURE
— “I agree with your assessment. But, could you make it more concise? I just finished shaving when I started reading your post. By the time I finished it, I had a five o’clock shadow!” — elsewhere
Sorry boss. I make my notes in YT comments as I listen to the video, then copy them to my archive and riff off them for a while.
Unfortunately, there is a reason we speak in normative and moral prose: it’s cheap. There is also a reason we speak in logical, scientific, and economic prose – despite that it’s expensive.
That cost is how we falsify normative and moral prose. “It’s the only way to be sure” so to speak.
-Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-04 17:40:25 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107220017176329342
-
So this is the most basic example of why I describe The Grammars as defined by a
So this is the most basic example of why I describe The Grammars as defined by adding or removing dimensions (constraints). Ideal Math = w/o Context, operational math = with Context. Ideal math uses infinity (next integer value) as the arbitrary limit if otherwise unspecified.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-03 19:04:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1455974178033741825
Reply addressees: @TwiceBlind @hoeberian
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1455973649429716997
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@TwiceBlind @hoeberian Secondly, mathematical deduction relies on the law of the excluded middle, and the arbitrary declaration of limits of precision, to compensate for scale independence caused by the absence of context that otherwise supplies a limit of precision.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1455973649429716997
-
HOW THE LEFT LIES BY REDEFINITION OF TERMS BY CONFLATION, INFLATION, AND REPETIT
HOW THE LEFT LIES BY REDEFINITION OF TERMS BY CONFLATION, INFLATION, AND REPETITION.
— “Whether one is a terrorist or a freedom fighter depends solely upon media coverage. According to the woke-media; George Washington was a terrorist. Sam Adams was a terrorist. Paul Revere was a terrorist.” — Doug Morrison @RadioFreeNorthwest
Years ago, at the beginning of the social media age, I had a long discussion with some of the folks who started the international terrorist database, and they didn’t distinguish between civil unrest, freedom fighters, civil war, proxy war, and war itself.
I thought they were as evil as hell. And they couldn’t understand., (a) they were funded by states, and (b) they were saying all states were legitimate, and (c) presuming that democratic rotation was always sufficient for political reformation.
This is how the enemy uses funding of fake-academics to produce fake-science, in order to conflate, and inflate vocabulary and concepts, in order to deceive the public, by appealing to the public desire to escape responsibility for policing the commons.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-03 18:50:22 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107214629915890884
-
I have to come visit you and spend an afternoon of high bandwidth communication,
I have to come visit you and spend an afternoon of high bandwidth communication, using pencil and paper or white board, and take some notes so we can create an vocabulary and narrative for this.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-02 17:57:18 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1455594882660196363
Reply addressees: @MichaelSurrago
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1455594312780156935
-
Yes, that’s how I got there. Agreed. And it’s how Wolfram got there too. The dif
Yes, that’s how I got there. Agreed. And it’s how Wolfram got there too. The difference is wolfram doesn’t (appear to) see the consistency of language as a system of measurement and the maths as a subset of that language. Or that language = universe’s evolution computation.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-02 17:50:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1455593232771989509
Reply addressees: @MichaelSurrago
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1455592756496277509
-
So when I say our ‘math’ is ‘off’ it’s because much of what appears complicated
So when I say our ‘math’ is ‘off’ it’s because much of what appears complicated with mathematics is not. It’s just mixing (conflating) logics. I don’t think I want to spend time on it, but it would be interesting to ‘correct’ math like I have logic and law. I suspect others will.
Source date (UTC): 2021-10-31 23:32:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1454954492894535683
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1454954053662912520
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
The division by zero problem as another result of mathematical conflation. As a length, zero is a limit, meaning division by zero results in infinity. As an operation, position, or count, it’s indifferent from one, since any integer value -1,0,1 is the same: itself.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1454954053662912520