Logic, or The Logics, begin with identity, and identity begins with faculties: sense-perception-integration-auto_association. Identity > Math > Algorithms > Operations > Speech (verbal logic). The reason being increasing permissible dimensions of measurement.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-17 15:39:10 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1460995939087360005
– “The complaint isn’t that your posts are word salad. The complaint is that you never make a point. A guy like you needs to follow a template, like 1. Briefly state conclusion 2. State context/motivation/problem. 3. Reason. 4. Re-state conclusion.” –
Yes it is. Every day. That said…
I make the point, I make the point over many posts, not just one. Because people don’t read long posts. (that’s the evidence.) if you can’t follow across the posts then that’s a filter. And you aren’t the audience.
There is only one way to save our civilization it’s by showing up in mass.
Showing up in mass requires a set of actionable asks that are hard to resist or morally reject by all. The young men (like yourself) are alienated from the upper classes with the skill to do that – you don’t have it. You are also biased to self overconfidence. That overconfidence manifests in simple-stupid-solutions that are impossible, and in leadership that fragments into personality cults – precisely because you lack the competency to do anything else. And this allows the left to pick you off one at a time, and prevent any and all leadership from emerging. And so the left is eating your lunch and drinking your milkshake.
As such we are limited in the number of ways we can organize ‘the dumb fucks, the slow kids’ into a political movement. Since we can’t organize these numbskulls into a political movement, we have only the hope of mobilizing them into a rebellion-movement, where we all show up and issue a set of possible demands ‘or else’. Even then, the chances that shit-for-brains, impulsive, ignorant, macho, virtue-signallers will screw it up is almost a certainty. So we have to make everyone dependent upon everyone else, by taking the same risk and ostracizing those from the future who don’t show and take the risk.
I’ve produced (a) the moral license (b) the set of demands (c) an actionable and implementable solution that will fix the problem (d) a strategy for a rapid victory, (e) and a devastatingly believable threat of consequences if negotiations on a settlement fail.(this constitution is a settlement that serves everyone left, center, and right) by restoring the constitution to its original designs as a federation of independent states.
And this particular strategy is directly licensed by the declaration and constitution.
Every other plan is a slow burn to failure. I’ve seen nothing that can survive other than retreat to a region, or retreat into a separate economy, or retreat into religion – meaning we only delay the inevitable.
The state will defend itself by happily burning the enemy (finance, academy, education, media, entertainment). The state cannot resist a moral claim without losing very rapidly its geostrategic position. So this plan uses the state’s self-interest against itself.
(…more in comments)
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-15 17:31:35 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107282267854606654
Working on The Summary. In other words “The Short Version” and it’s just about 100 pages. The ‘poster’ will be about ten pages, because other than the Grammars it’s pretty simple. But you know, the short version? Not so short. The Constitution? Another 80-100 pages. Sigh.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-14 18:31:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1459952237988438022
Or linguistic recombination isn’t closed, it’s infinite, which is why there is no closure (Godel) to math or logic or language (because they’re all languages) nor to the universe. And economic ‘langauge’ consists of combinations of recombinations of varying reciprocal exchanges.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-12 20:14:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1459253247093399564
Reply addressees: @WorMartiN
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1459252826920697859
Continuous recursive disambiguation by combination and then recombination into a hierarchical network of stable relations (states), and changes in states that are unambiguous (survive) and therefore ‘true’.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-12 20:13:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1459252918931054597
Ethnicity. But ethnicity and language overlap.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-12 18:04:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1459220451515936774
Reply addressees: @nequalita
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1459219165596860426
I agree of course. I think that it’s more intuitive to teach the logic of cooperation than it is the logic of arithmetic, mathematics or even the grammar of written prose. The question is can we teach those first principles right away? Of course we can.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-09 19:06:38 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1458149047827668993
Reply addressees: @MichaelSurrago
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1458148358502113281
elegant synthesis. I think… yes, I think I see how to represent that on the table of grammars, by adding problem solving on top of describing, narrating, fictionalizing.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-09 19:00:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1458147407884128257
Reply addressees: @MichaelSurrago
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1458146888872570883
JAE: Apriorism can’t be true because just as math and logic are not closed, math and logic are just subsets of ordinary language grammar:continuous recursive disambiguation. There is no closure to infinity without realistic application of a general rule to a particular condition.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-08 16:26:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457746385479032836
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457746384422117379
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
JAE: His praxeology was a primitive, operational (true) stack-logic (false), of commodity purchases (irrelevant to behavioral economics), that could explain (falsify) a subset of human behavior (rational action under incentives) when presented as empirical evidence. PERIOD.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1457746384422117379
9) Abrahamism:
Consists of undermining truth reason probability and evidence by use of False Promise, Baiting into Hazard, Pilpul (positive), Critique (negative), straw-manning, and heaping of
undue praise, and propagation into social construction, to use suggestion and overloading to force individuals, groups, and polities, to appeal to your intuition rather than reason and evidence. it’s the same technique used by faith healers, priests, and con artists. And the higher a group’s trust the more susceptible they are to it.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-07 02:27:53 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107233415874967945
Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107233409170355771
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
TERMS: Grammar, Logic, Justification, Sophistry, Pilpul, Critique, Abrahamism 1) Grammar: (a) rules of “continuous recursive disambiguation” creating a contract for meaning, and consisting of: A Paradigm, consisting of: First Principles, Logic, Vocabulary, Syntax. (b) Grammars can be DeflationaryInflationary, where deflationary consists of math, logic, accounting, procedures, etc, and inflationary consist of stories, fictions, fictionalisms, deceits, and denials etc. (c) Operational grammar: operational grammar consists of complete sentences in promissory form, consisting of a sequence of subjectively testable operations producing complete transactions of changes in state. ie: ‘unambiguous measurements’. 2) Logic: the test of constant relations between properties reducible to analogy to experience, internally as identity, externally between premises and statements, or externally between statements. (a) all statements must consist of continuously recursive disambiguation (b) there is no closure other than tautology, (c) all non-tautological tests are falsificationary. (d) falsification requires tests: internal, external, operational, rational, reciprocal, completeness. 3) Truth: (a)Truth consists of a claim of innocence, by testimony sufficient for the satisfaction of demand for infallibility in the context. https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/04/24/truth-testimony-that-satisfies-demand-for-infallibility/ (b) Hierarchy of Decidability: Statements are undecidable, possibly true, or certainly false. All logic is Ternary. (c) A proof provides a test of possibility: a justification. Truth must survive falsification. 4) Justification: either (a) a moral explanation for a claim of innocence (b) a false pretense that a proof is other than a possibility (c) and an evasion of the cost of falsification. (d) a fraud constructed by the pretense of due diligency by paying the cost of falsification. 5) Sophistry: (a) General: any use of loading, framing, suggestion, obscuring, conflating, inflating, fictionalism, or denial, to claim consistency in identity, internality, externality, operationality, rationality, reciprocity, or completeness that does not exist. (b) More specifically, the use of the three means of fictionalism: Physical: Magic to Pseudoscience, Verbal: Sophistry to idealism (philosophy), Imaginary: Occult to Supernaturalism (theology), to convey a pretense of causality or knowledge that cannot be testified to. 7) Pilpul: (attached) “The Positive Sell” Sophistry that implies a false promise of freedom from formal, physical, natural, or evolutionary laws by use of the following methods: (first image) 8) Critique: (attached) “The Negative Sell” (second and third images) (9) MORE IN COMMENTS….
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107233409170355771