Yes, that’s how I got there. Agreed. And it’s how Wolfram got there too. The difference is wolfram doesn’t (appear to) see the consistency of language as a system of measurement and the maths as a subset of that language. Or that language = universe’s evolution computation.
Source date (UTC): 2021-11-02 17:50:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1455593232771989509
Reply addressees: @MichaelSurrago
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1455592756496277509
Leave a Reply