JAE: Apriorism can’t be true because just as math and logic are not closed, math

JAE: Apriorism can’t be true because just as math and logic are not closed, math and logic are just subsets of ordinary language grammar:continuous recursive disambiguation. There is no closure to infinity without realistic application of a general rule to a particular condition.


Source date (UTC): 2021-11-08 16:26:36 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457746385479032836

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1457746384422117379


IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

JAE: His praxeology was a primitive, operational (true) stack-logic (false), of commodity purchases (irrelevant to behavioral economics), that could explain (falsify) a subset of human behavior (rational action under incentives) when presented as empirical evidence. PERIOD.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1457746384422117379

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *