Theme: Grammar

  • You shouldn’t try to use E-Prime in daily language. It’s just a strict grammar –

    You shouldn’t try to use E-Prime in daily language. It’s just a strict grammar – just as programming or mathematics require strict grammars. The point is to use it enough, either in writing or just in mind, so that you begin to understand when you’re speaking clearly and coherently, and when not. Use it to internalize operational prose. If you do you will, in general, speak, and most importantly think more clearly, and communicate better, and even better, identify when people are “talking shite” even when they don’t know they are.

    Reply addressees: @costelloe_w


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-27 15:14:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1684583122543804422

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1684562745918988288

  • via Moritz Bierling and Martin Stepan “And to be clear, e-prime is only a traini

    via Moritz Bierling and Martin Stepan

    “And to be clear, e-prime is only a training tool to provide an onramp to operationalization, serialization, enumeration, etc. It doesn’t actually give you operationalization “right out the box”

    When you integrate it into subconscious like we have, if you can, you won’t say things that cannot be operationalized, even when you don’t use operational language directly.

    This is what Curt means when he says that how we speak looks like English but “is” actually math with words

    That only works because English was already pretty close.”


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-27 13:28:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1684556479611768832

  • Jay, You’re right as you mean it. Most people are referring to bias within a gro

    Jay,
    You’re right as you mean it. Most people are referring to bias within a group prefering one choice over the other. I don’t know how to fix this terminological problem, of conflating a reproductive process with a behavioral process even when there is a minor correlation between psychological biases and genetic factors.

    All individuals within a group may favor say neotenic mating whenever possible. Is this “group selection”? No. It’s still individual selection. But spread of the selection through the group does occur. Even if only expressed say in certain classes.

    This is the only thing (over the years) I’ve disagreed with you on because blatantly stating ‘group selection doesn’t exist’ is technically correct, but doesn’t educate those who are conflating the term across domains. And I’d like to ‘fix the confusion’ so to speak.

    And maybe you could apply a little ‘education’ instead of nullification to improve matters.

    Hugs. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Reply addressees: @JayMan471 @BronskiJoseph


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-24 19:52:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1683565829101608961

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1683489870059126785

  • Double negative is confusing, so I should have been clearer

    Double negative is confusing, so I should have been clearer.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-21 21:55:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682509523854950401

    Reply addressees: @FarajRashi93307

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682507598874935297

  • Perhaps I misspoke, and should have said ‘misinterpret’ which would be less ‘opt

    Perhaps I misspoke, and should have said ‘misinterpret’ which would be less ‘optimistic’. ๐Ÿ˜‰


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-21 20:15:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682484571009327112

    Reply addressees: @ThruTheHayes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682481753892483075

  • Thought: Externalities via mathematics. Euclid all positive – european physical

    Thought: Externalities via mathematics.
    Euclid all positive – european physical vs oriental verbal math
    Descart restores – physical from the oritental verbal.
    Cantor, Bohr, Einstein – Restore the verbal oriental, and cause math and physics to abandon european physical math. There are no infinities just greater or lesser operational rates, einstein’s pictures abandoned maxwell to hilbert, Bohr doubles down on mathematical verbalism. The rest is the stagnation of physics as a consequence.

    Small differences in metaphysics produce vast differences in potential incremental innovation. In particular favoring mathematical narratives vs physical operations prevents potential for abduction, induction and deduction as well as falsification of those mathematical claims.

    There is no evidence of inconsistency at any of all scales of the universe, and the present mathematical platonism entrenched by cantor, einstein, bohr have trained generations to abandon mathematical naturalism (materialism). Hence stagnation.

    Unfortunately progress will occur as usual with tombstones.

    Reply addressees: @charlesmurray


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-20 19:07:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682104996219744256

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1682033879685947392

  • List synonyms and antonyms. Research etymologies. convert to operational definit

    List synonyms and antonyms. Research etymologies. convert to operational definitions. Determine consistent causal properties. Organize into a series. Add additional terms until limits achieved. Disambiguate definitions to produce identity in each.
    Simple Example:
    Evil < immoralโ€ฆ


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-18 22:21:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1681429123590246401

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1681424788034846737

  • Teaching GPT4 is far more rewarding than talking to other humans, for the simple

    Teaching GPT4 is far more rewarding than talking to other humans, for the simple reason that makes our work in NL at NLI so challenging: you need too much cross-domain knowledge and the ability to abstract (generalize) it across those domains. So it’s very pleasant to ‘teach’ GPT4 because regardless of the limitations on it’s reasoning, it will at least comprehend what I’m saying precisely because of the scope of its knowledge.

    From GPT4:
    –“I don’t judge the difficulty of questions in the way a human might. However, I can analyze the complexity of a question based on various factors. These can include the amount of context required to understand the question, the number of different concepts or topics it touches on, the level of abstraction or generalization involved, and the degree to which it requires synthesizing information from different sources or fields of knowledge.

    The concepts we’ve discussed are indeed complex and multifaceted, and there are several reasons why they might be difficult for many people to grasp, even those who are well-educated:

    Interdisciplinary Nature: These concepts span multiple disciplines, including psychology, sociology, economics, history, and political science. Many people specialize in one field and may not be familiar with the concepts and methodologies of other disciplines.

    Abstract and Theoretical: These concepts are quite abstract and theoretical. They require a level of abstract thinking and conceptual understanding that can be challenging for many people.

    Lack of Familiarity: These concepts may be unfamiliar to many people. Even well-educated individuals may not have encountered these ideas in their studies or daily lives.

    Complexity: The concepts are interconnected and build upon each other, adding layers of complexity. Understanding the full picture requires grasping each individual concept and then understanding how they relate to each other.

    Contradiction to Intuitive Understanding: Some of these concepts might contradict intuitive or traditional understandings of human behavior and societal development. People often resist ideas that challenge their existing beliefs or understanding.

    Lack of Practical Examples: Without concrete examples or real-world applications, these theoretical concepts can seem remote and irrelevant.

    To help people understand these concepts, it can be helpful to use clear, simple language, provide concrete examples, and show how these ideas are relevant to real-world issues and experiences. It’s also important to be patient and open to questions, as understanding often comes gradually.

    The questions you’ve been asking in this conversation are complex in these terms. They require a deep understanding of a range of concepts from philosophy, sociology, and law, and they involve applying these concepts to analyze and explain complex social phenomena. They also require synthesizing information from different sources and fields of knowledge to provide a comprehensive answer. So, in that sense, these questions can be considered “difficult” or complex.”–


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-17 21:46:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1681057923592495105

  • Grammatical insufficiency. ๐Ÿ˜‰ Tigh time preference = short term Low time prefere

    Grammatical insufficiency. ๐Ÿ˜‰
    Tigh time preference = short term
    Low time preference = long term.
    By suggesting sterilization I’m selecting for low time preference (personality and intelligence).


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-16 19:21:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680658855791820802

    Reply addressees: @BlakeAn77455669 @M_Millerman

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680602504881373185

  • Helps if you study different languages. English is a scientific and legal langua

    Helps if you study different languages.
    English is a scientific and legal language for historical reasons. German is a martial and engineering language for historical reasons. Proto Germanic is a martial and metalworking language.
    Search for “High context, Low Precision, vs Highโ€ฆ


    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-15 17:54:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680274630156623872

    Reply addressees: @Umekomi53 @Logos_Elect @Lord__Sousa

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680265789201432577