Look. My work is reducible to a single thing: I completed the scientific method such that we can test statements and arguments in every field by a single grammatical system. The rest of it is just the application of the completion of that method to the entire spectrum of human knowledge, from metaphysics through aesthetics.
Source date (UTC): 2017-09-13 18:03:00 UTC
HOW REAL ARE YOU?
Can you even speak without idealism, mysticism and conflation? You probably don’t know the extent of your infection by the language of deception.
Why? Speaking existentially removes the illusion of ad therefore pretense of, knowledge.
There isn’t a big difference between “feels” and “ideals”.
The difference is between reals and *everything else* including ideals and feels.
|| Measurement > Real > Analogy > Ideal > Mysticism > Lie.
Source date (UTC): 2017-09-11 13:07:00 UTC
SOVEREIGNTY: NAMES MEAN THINGS.
(thoughtful commentary pls)
Well, there are a few things to think of.
Virtruvianism(metaphysics), Acquisitionism(psychology), Propertarianism(ethics), Testimonialism(Epistemology), and Market Fascism are probably necessary for the different sub-domains of the program. This is terminology used in philosophy.
‘-ism’ means ‘set of rules(decisions), judgments(values), and categories (objects of consideration). Objective.
‘-ian’ refers to a belief, tendency, or adherent(person). Subjective.
The group evolutionary strategy of the west is “Transcendence through via positiva of Agency and via negativa of Sovereignty thereby requiring Natural Law, which requires Truth and Markets in everything”
My preference is for “Sovereignty” so that the propertarian methodology (including acquisitionism, propertarianism, testimonialism) is paired with the group evolutionary strategy (sovereignty).
So in that sense:
1) Sovereignty (the system)
2) Propertarian (the method)
3) The different sub philosophies: Vitruvianism(metaphysics), Acquisitionism(psychology), Propertarianism(ethics), Testimonialism(epistemology), and Market Fascism(politics), and Evolution-ism (transcendent group evolutionary strategy)
4) Heroism, Excellence, Morality, and Beauty (aesthetics) do not need any further work as far as I know.
I want to preserve my attack on philosophy by coopting their structure and demonstrating that its all Idealism (nonsense). And that Sovereignty is as much as science as is possible given our current knowledge of the universe.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-31 11:38:00 UTC
SEMIOTICS – BY ANY OTHER NAME – THE STUDY OF LYING
—“SEMIOTICS is the study of meaning-making, the study of sign processes and meaningful communication. This includes the study of signs and sign processes (semiosis), indication, designation, likeness, analogy, allegory, metonymy, metaphor, symbolism, signification, and communication.”—
You notice what it DOESN”T include? Truth. Operational Descriptions. Testimony. Accountability. Reciprocity.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-18 14:39:00 UTC
—Natural languages do not have fixed grammatical rules–
Yes they do.
1) Noun (name), Verb(change in state) Value judgement. (it is questionable whether value judgement is a verb or a loading )
2) Referential recursion for Noun, Verb, and Phrase.
3) High or low context with high or low precision.
4) Operational grammar, ideal grammar (what you use), experiential grammar, or some conflation of them (ie: fictionalism, philosophy, theology).
5) Analogy to subjective experience
6) Subjective experience limited to range of possible human action.
All languages demonstrate these properties. AFAIK all languages Must demonstrate these properties.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-17 13:26:00 UTC
Honestly. I get accused of word salad, but then some idiot or other will argue hoppe makes sense. Well, you know, that’s just because he says what you want to hear, and what you want to hear makes sense to your intuitions, and what makes sense to your intuitions is that which corresponds to your moral instincts. In other words, you are victim of suggestion using fictionalism, just as I have argued for years now. The conditions you make moral judgements by are not the conditions that exist. They are merely your cognitive biases, and your cognitive biases are merely reflections of your reproductive(survival, competitive) strategy. Meaning? Abrahamism in the ancient and the modern worlds finds useful idiots all too easily.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-11 09:52:00 UTC
Twitter brevity leads to easy misinterpretation.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-10 22:23:56 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/895772733581262848
Reply addressees: @JayMan471
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/895325450938892289
IN REPLY TO:
@JayMan471
@curtdoolittle Nonsense of course.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/895325450938892289
Use of ‘is/are/was/were’ functions as sinning if not fraud in philosophy. We desire to create institutions that provide insurance which by contract or convention we may exercise contractual rights of defense and restitution against impositions of costs upon our mind, body, actions, or property – but not emotions. So there are no human rights. Instead, we have created a list of rights we desire to produce institutions that defend and perform restitution.
Source date (UTC): 2017-08-07 21:46:00 UTC