Curt Doolittle

Theme: Grammar

  • Minor Update to The Grammars

    MINOR UPDATE TO THE GRAMMARS Fussing with this problem a long time but have improved the categories of the Fictionalisms by converting to spectrums. … Deceits … … … Fictionalism … … … …. Pseudoscience -> Magic … … … …. Idealism-> Surrealism, and … … … …. Supernaturalism->Occult === LIST (W/O DEFLATIONARY GRAMMARS) === THE SPECTRUM: 1. Sense(stimuli) … … Perception (composition) … … … Association 2. Logic Facility (constant relations) … … Imagination Facility (prediction) … … … Reason Facility (comparison, permutation) 3. Grammar facility (statements) … … Paradigms (‘metaphysics’, ‘dimensions’) … … Vocabulary … … … Sounds … … … Signs (acts, actions) … … … Marks (records) … … … … accidental … … … … intentional … … … … … Mark … … … … … Symbol … … … … … … Glyph … … … … … Pictogram … … … … … Picture … … … … … Picture Series … … … … … Animation 4. Communication Facility (“Language”) … Truths … … Logics (deflationary Grammars) … … Rhetoric (argumentative, persuasive Grammars) … Descriptions … … Testimony … Ordinary Language … Narrations (inflationary Grammars) … … Narrative (description) … … … Storytelling (loading, framing) … Deceits … … … Fictionalism … … … …. Pseudoscience -> Magic… … … …. Idealism-> Surrealism, and… … … …. Supernaturalism->Occult … … … Obscurantism (Obscuring, Overloading) … … … … Propaganda … … … Misdirection (Deceit) … … … Fraud (for gain) … … … Harm (Evil, for harm regardless of gain)

  • Minor Update to The Grammars

    MINOR UPDATE TO THE GRAMMARS Fussing with this problem a long time but have improved the categories of the Fictionalisms by converting to spectrums. … Deceits … … … Fictionalism … … … …. Pseudoscience -> Magic … … … …. Idealism-> Surrealism, and … … … …. Supernaturalism->Occult === LIST (W/O DEFLATIONARY GRAMMARS) === THE SPECTRUM: 1. Sense(stimuli) … … Perception (composition) … … … Association 2. Logic Facility (constant relations) … … Imagination Facility (prediction) … … … Reason Facility (comparison, permutation) 3. Grammar facility (statements) … … Paradigms (‘metaphysics’, ‘dimensions’) … … Vocabulary … … … Sounds … … … Signs (acts, actions) … … … Marks (records) … … … … accidental … … … … intentional … … … … … Mark … … … … … Symbol … … … … … … Glyph … … … … … Pictogram … … … … … Picture … … … … … Picture Series … … … … … Animation 4. Communication Facility (“Language”) … Truths … … Logics (deflationary Grammars) … … Rhetoric (argumentative, persuasive Grammars) … Descriptions … … Testimony … Ordinary Language … Narrations (inflationary Grammars) … … Narrative (description) … … … Storytelling (loading, framing) … Deceits … … … Fictionalism … … … …. Pseudoscience -> Magic… … … …. Idealism-> Surrealism, and… … … …. Supernaturalism->Occult … … … Obscurantism (Obscuring, Overloading) … … … … Propaganda … … … Misdirection (Deceit) … … … Fraud (for gain) … … … Harm (Evil, for harm regardless of gain)

  • YOu are confusing my language with some thing I’m not saying

    YOu are confusing my language with some thing I’m not saying.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-24 01:18:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176304895231713280

    Reply addressees: @YashPunia4 @AEI

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1176304823232290816

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @YashPunia4 @AEI I agree it is the best one you have had.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1176304823232290816

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @YashPunia4 @AEI I agree it is the best one you have had.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1176304823232290816

  • That thing we call kin selection scales across disciplines, and only because we

    That thing we call kin selection scales across disciplines, and only because we artificially isolate disciplines so that each discipline can maintain it’s grammar (system of paradigms and terms – meaning measurements). It’s this systemic problem I spend time solving with P.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 00:50:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175935519651504128

    Reply addressees: @User1233213

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175935215824322561

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @User1233213 This is a problem that arises from disciplinary specialization rather than mastery of multiple fields – and is another example of why I teach the Grammars, and use Economics (demonstrated behavior at scale) where others do not. Groups demonstrate different criteria for selection.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175935215824322561

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @User1233213 This is a problem that arises from disciplinary specialization rather than mastery of multiple fields – and is another example of why I teach the Grammars, and use Economics (demonstrated behavior at scale) where others do not. Groups demonstrate different criteria for selection.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175935215824322561

  • This is a problem that arises from disciplinary specialization rather than maste

    This is a problem that arises from disciplinary specialization rather than mastery of multiple fields – and is another example of why I teach the Grammars, and use Economics (demonstrated behavior at scale) where others do not. Groups demonstrate different criteria for selection.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 00:49:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175935215824322561

    Reply addressees: @User1233213

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175934766559965185

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @User1233213 For example Jayman will disagree group selection but he limits the term to its origins, rather than expanding it to cover increasing means of selection based upon circumstantial demand – the most obvious being masculine traits in stress, and less so in plenty.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175934766559965185

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @User1233213 For example Jayman will disagree group selection but he limits the term to its origins, rather than expanding it to cover increasing means of selection based upon circumstantial demand – the most obvious being masculine traits in stress, and less so in plenty.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175934766559965185

  • For example Jayman will disagree group selection but he limits the term to its o

    For example Jayman will disagree group selection but he limits the term to its origins, rather than expanding it to cover increasing means of selection based upon circumstantial demand – the most obvious being masculine traits in stress, and less so in plenty.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 00:47:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175934766559965185

    Reply addressees: @User1233213

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175934427270209537

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @User1233213 This is a test of verbalisms. Do we use one term for kin and extrapolate from there, or do we use a series beginning with kin selection, or do we take the terms from behavioral economics, and talk in the term of discounts. There are multiple term-category conflicts in this space.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175934427270209537

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @User1233213 This is a test of verbalisms. Do we use one term for kin and extrapolate from there, or do we use a series beginning with kin selection, or do we take the terms from behavioral economics, and talk in the term of discounts. There are multiple term-category conflicts in this space.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175934427270209537

  • This is a test of verbalisms. Do we use one term for kin and extrapolate from th

    This is a test of verbalisms. Do we use one term for kin and extrapolate from there, or do we use a series beginning with kin selection, or do we take the terms from behavioral economics, and talk in the term of discounts. There are multiple term-category conflicts in this space.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 00:46:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175934427270209537

    Reply addressees: @User1233213

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175933781062115328

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @User1233213 Kin selection is demonstrated in every single stage of social order from the drowning test, friend selection, to neighborhood selection, to workplace, to voting patterns, to buying and art patterns. Clannishness varies as does trust by race and subrace. WTF are you talking about?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175933781062115328

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @User1233213 Kin selection is demonstrated in every single stage of social order from the drowning test, friend selection, to neighborhood selection, to workplace, to voting patterns, to buying and art patterns. Clannishness varies as does trust by race and subrace. WTF are you talking about?

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175933781062115328

  • Again. Dimensions. 0. Logic = Constant relations of sense perceptions. 1. Identi

    Again. Dimensions.

    0. Logic = Constant relations of sense perceptions.

    1. Identity =(NAMES)
    – Internally consistent, not inconsistent, sets of properties
    – Constant Relations between… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=469511913645704&id=100017606988153

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-21 00:23:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175203913303244801

  • Again. Dimensions. 0. Logic = Constant relations of sense perceptions. 1. Identi

    Again. Dimensions.

    0. Logic = Constant relations of sense perceptions.

    1. Identity =(NAMES)

    – Internally consistent, not inconsistent, sets of properties

    – Constant Relations between collections of properties.

    2. Sets = (LANGUAGE)

    – Internally consistent (constant, consistent relations), Relations, , .)

    – Constant relations between collections of references

    3. Science = (OBSERVATIONS)

    – Empirical, externally correspondent, correlative

    – Constant Relations between collections of references and reality

    4. Operational = (ACTIONS)

    – Operationally consistent or operationally possible Causation

    – Constant Relations between collections of references, actions, and reality in time.

    5. Rational (reasonable) = (RATIONAL INCENTIVE)

    (choice)

    6. Reciprocity = (RECIPROCAL INCENTIVES)

    (cooperation)

    This is the full set of dimensions of causality that humans can perceive and compare in order to decide.

    Each depends upon the one before it.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-20 20:23:00 UTC

  • And so, I assume what you’re pointing out is that bias and deceit is available i

    And so, I assume what you’re pointing out is that bias and deceit is available in each of these grammars – and the knowledge of the difference between collective consistency and correspondence and coherence, and an act of deceit, depends on deltas of knowledge in and across each.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-09-20 16:11:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175080080873349122

    Reply addressees: @PoseidonAwoke

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175079244348739589

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @PoseidonAwoke Incline for more information and decline for less information (knowledge). So I guess it’s a nit, but we use the method of satisfying demand for decidability (which is what you mean as faith, belief, experience, prediction) depends upon the knowledge we have.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175079244348739589

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @PoseidonAwoke Incline for more information and decline for less information (knowledge). So I guess it’s a nit, but we use the method of satisfying demand for decidability (which is what you mean as faith, belief, experience, prediction) depends upon the knowledge we have.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175079244348739589