And so, I assume what you’re pointing out is that bias and deceit is available in each of these grammars – and the knowledge of the difference between collective consistency and correspondence and coherence, and an act of deceit, depends on deltas of knowledge in and across each.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-20 16:11:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175080080873349122
Reply addressees: @PoseidonAwoke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175079244348739589
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@PoseidonAwoke Incline for more information and decline for less information (knowledge). So I guess it’s a nit, but we use the method of satisfying demand for decidability (which is what you mean as faith, belief, experience, prediction) depends upon the knowledge we have.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175079244348739589
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@PoseidonAwoke Incline for more information and decline for less information (knowledge). So I guess it’s a nit, but we use the method of satisfying demand for decidability (which is what you mean as faith, belief, experience, prediction) depends upon the knowledge we have.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175079244348739589
Leave a Reply