For example Jayman will disagree group selection but he limits the term to its origins, rather than expanding it to cover increasing means of selection based upon circumstantial demand – the most obvious being masculine traits in stress, and less so in plenty.
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-23 00:47:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175934766559965185
Reply addressees: @User1233213
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1175934427270209537
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@User1233213 This is a test of verbalisms. Do we use one term for kin and extrapolate from there, or do we use a series beginning with kin selection, or do we take the terms from behavioral economics, and talk in the term of discounts. There are multiple term-category conflicts in this space.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175934427270209537
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@User1233213 This is a test of verbalisms. Do we use one term for kin and extrapolate from there, or do we use a series beginning with kin selection, or do we take the terms from behavioral economics, and talk in the term of discounts. There are multiple term-category conflicts in this space.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1175934427270209537
Leave a Reply