Curt Doolittle

Theme: Governance

  • RELIGION AND THE SECTS Religion combines wisdom literature, rituals, and social

    RELIGION AND THE SECTS

    Religion combines wisdom literature, rituals, and social assembly to create personal, interpersonal, social, and political mindfulness with of a system of intuitive, coherent measurement, that relieves the pre-consious brain of stress about status, conflict, and uncertainty. We gain the elation of the primitive animal running with, hunting, feasting, resting, and safety within the pack (herd). Narratives (stories) using archetypes (expressions of instincts) are the most imprecise but universal and easily understood system of measurement.

    Christianity works. Religion works. Institutions, traditions, laws, and norms work. For the same reason: error elimination on one hand, and norm creation on the other, together which reduce cognitive load, which reduce stress, which maintains self image, which maintains status in interacting with others.

    Of the christian sects it appears that we find the best of something in each group. In evangelical protestantism we find the closest to Jesus’ teachings. In orthodoxy we find the preservation of tradition, and nationalism. In Catholicism we find an attempt at an intellectual and philosophical expansion of the underlying theology. In secular christianity we find the completion of the christian evolution into the via negativa natural law AND via positiva christian love.

    I can quite easily explain what we find as failing in each of those traditions – most of which result in (a) universalism (b) failure to accommodate the fundamental, ritualistic-traditional, phiosophical-moral, and scientific spectrum – and worse, a failure to integrate and retain our martial gods and their teachings – that saved us in the real world when christianity failed.

    I admit when I’m wrong all the time. I make many mistakes (irrelevant) but I err (relevant) very infrequently. Not because I am special but because the P-method makes it very, very, difficult to err.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-25 20:59:00 UTC

  • What is Necessary for an optimum Government 0) A militia consisting of sharehold

    What is Necessary for an optimum Government

    0) A militia consisting of shareholders who reciprocally and unconditionally, insure one another’s property-in-toto from the involuntary imposition of costs by both members and non.

    1) A contract (constitution) between those shareholders for that reciprocal insurance, consisting of Rule of law, natural law, universal standing, universal applicability, absence of discretion through strict construction, with a monarchy as a judge (veto) of last resort. And providing for:

    2) A market for polities in which many small polities compete by the production of different commons. (btw: what polities will attract not only the most, but the best women?)

    3) A market for the production of commons within any given polity, by exchange between the classes (those with different reproductive strategies, capabilities, and capital interests)

    4) A Market for the production of goods and services within any given polity by exchanges between individuals and organizations OTHER than those that exclusively produce commons.

    5) A market for the production of generations (marriage) within any given polity, within any given market for commons, within any given market for production of goods, services, and information.

    6) A market for association and cooperation, within the market for polities, the market for commons, the market for private goods, the market for reproduction.

    7) A market for the resolution of disputes over property in toto by application and strict construction of the natural law of cooperation: reciprocity. (Judiciary)

    8) A market for the production of contracts (agreements) in all markets (lawyers)

    9) An insurer of last resort consisting of: A military of last resort, A treasury of last resort (shares in the nation), An insurer against acts of nature, age, and incompetence of last resort.

    Share this:

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-25 12:20:00 UTC

  • Fascism was an expansion of napoleon’s ‘total war’ from military and political t

    Fascism was an expansion of napoleon’s ‘total war’ from military and political to economic, social, and cultural. It’s not complicated. It’s all the poetic propaganda that obscures it’s just WAR by all available means.

    Fascism was european total warfare against non-european total warfare by communism.

    Propaganda is not operational.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-25 10:50:00 UTC

  • P IS JUST A METHOD. THE P-CONSTITUTION IS AN APPLICATION OUR APPLICATION IS INTO

    P IS JUST A METHOD. THE P-CONSTITUTION IS AN APPLICATION OUR APPLICATION IS INTOLERANT OF COMPETITION AGAINST THE PEOPLE. BUT IT”S STILL RULE OF LAW.

    —“P isn’t similar to NS, it just may seem like it in contrast to the madness of “liberal democracy”.”—Martin Štěpán,

    —“I think it is misleading to try to think of some ideology as ‘closest to P’. That way you end up thinking that P is similar to ‘whatever’ or ‘sort of whatever’. That surely isn’t the case, even tough there are/might be similarities with ‘whatever’.”—Jonne Klockars

    —“is not the whole point that it’s not an ideology at all?”–Crypto X

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-25 10:46:00 UTC

  • MATURITY OF YOUR POLITICAL PREFERENCE “The Limits of Calculability” 1. Communism

    MATURITY OF YOUR POLITICAL PREFERENCE

    “The Limits of Calculability”

    1. Communism (Family) >

    2. … Socialism (Extended Family) >

    3. … … Classical Liberalism (Community – Market) >

    4. … … … Rule of Law (Nation(People) – Multiple Markets) >

    5. … … … … Military (Territory(International) – Competing Markets).

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-25 08:35:00 UTC

  • Packs and The Herd

    By Coach Noah Revoy, Apr 6, 2020, 5:23 PM [H]umans are either PACK orientated or HERD orientated. The HERD has a low consciousness hive mind, they are easily controlled, manipulated and spooked. The PACK is made up of highly conscious and capable individuals who choose to join the hierarchy for mutual benefit. HERDs form by “accident” when a sufficient number of herbivores gather in the same spot. Entry to the HERD is unearned. HERDs expand and multiply during good times. When trouble comes they turn on each other, abandoned the young, old, sick and weak. Thus the HERD gets thinned. PACKs form to hunt prey and to fight outsiders. To take advantage of opportunity or to deal with a threat. Entry to the PACK is earned. PACKs degenerate in the good times. They get fat and lazy. Hard times bring out the sharpness in the wolf. Struggle binds the pack together. If you are part of a PACK, then you are PACK orientated. If you are not in a PACK you are in a HERD. If you are alone, you are still in a HERD, you are just a little lost from the group, probably they left you behind. The HERD sacrifices those it leaves behind. As life gets harder we will see more men forming PACKs. Struggle brings out the wolf in men. The best men are already in PACKs, ready for the break down to signal the start of the hunt. The next best men are already looking to form or join a PACK. Will you be left behind?

  • Packs and The Herd

    By Coach Noah Revoy, Apr 6, 2020, 5:23 PM [H]umans are either PACK orientated or HERD orientated. The HERD has a low consciousness hive mind, they are easily controlled, manipulated and spooked. The PACK is made up of highly conscious and capable individuals who choose to join the hierarchy for mutual benefit. HERDs form by “accident” when a sufficient number of herbivores gather in the same spot. Entry to the HERD is unearned. HERDs expand and multiply during good times. When trouble comes they turn on each other, abandoned the young, old, sick and weak. Thus the HERD gets thinned. PACKs form to hunt prey and to fight outsiders. To take advantage of opportunity or to deal with a threat. Entry to the PACK is earned. PACKs degenerate in the good times. They get fat and lazy. Hard times bring out the sharpness in the wolf. Struggle binds the pack together. If you are part of a PACK, then you are PACK orientated. If you are not in a PACK you are in a HERD. If you are alone, you are still in a HERD, you are just a little lost from the group, probably they left you behind. The HERD sacrifices those it leaves behind. As life gets harder we will see more men forming PACKs. Struggle brings out the wolf in men. The best men are already in PACKs, ready for the break down to signal the start of the hunt. The next best men are already looking to form or join a PACK. Will you be left behind?

  • Think tank papers don’t say the ‘unsayable’ because they are paid by people who

    Think tank papers don’t say the ‘unsayable’ because they are paid by people who don’t want those things said, and they’d be put out of donors by the media if they even tried.

    There are many reasons to work outside of the academy and think tank biz. Marx & Me in coffee shops. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 20:51:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253788784610680833

    Reply addressees: @unfinis06265716

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253788261291569152

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @unfinis06265716 There is no weaponry I don’t know about b/c costs are visible. There is no threat other than mexico and that’s an advantage. The rest of the world needs USA’s stability. USA doesn’t. An unstable chaotic world just makes everything better for the USA (canada, australia, uk).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1253788261291569152

  • There is no weaponry I don’t know about b/c costs are visible. There is no threa

    There is no weaponry I don’t know about b/c costs are visible. There is no threat other than mexico and that’s an advantage. The rest of the world needs USA’s stability. USA doesn’t. An unstable chaotic world just makes everything better for the USA (canada, australia, uk).

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 20:49:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253788261291569152

    Reply addressees: @unfinis06265716

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253786926340923392

  • I think you’re terribly naive to assume every intelligence and state department

    I think you’re terribly naive to assume every intelligence and state department the world doesn’t know what’s in that video because all of it comes from think tank papers and presentations.

    And I don’t think you understand that the video was our primary funnel for the year.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 20:39:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253785652677824518

    Reply addressees: @unfinis06265716

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253784760649842688