Theme: Governance

  • “Can you describe the difference between P and Bakunin anarchy. Just reading som

    —“Can you describe the difference between P and Bakunin anarchy. Just reading something and the description seemed very similar to P but seems to simply lack the formalism around reciprocity.—-

    P is a method.

    I use the P-method to explain all group strategies, religions, political systems, and moral intuitions.

    I use P to recommend the optimum political system that has ever been formed – rule of law by natural law.

    I dunno why you would pick Bakunin. This is Bakunin’s fantasy:

    –“The liberty of man consists solely in this, that he obeys the laws of nature because he has himself recognized them as such, and not because they have been imposed upon him externally by any foreign will whatsoever, human or divine, collective or individual.”–Bakunin

    What is true instead?

    Man desires consumption, consumption is increased by opportunity, and opportunity is increased by liberty, but so is irresponsibility. And so is free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, immigration, conversion, conquest, and genocide.

    The state evolved to incrementally suppress local parasitism decreasing local transaction costs, in exchange for paying taxes to pay the cost of decreasing local transaction costs. This made markets possible where only primitive trade previously existed.

    Man is amoral by nature, and pragmatic. By the institution of parenting, acculturation, indoctrination, training, laws, restitution, punishment, and prevention we invest in his domestication.

    Man develops theology, philosophy, ideologies, rationalizations, myths, fantasies, and various other forms of frauds, to attempt to obscure and justify his free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, and organized crime.

    In order to produce the suppression of free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, and organized crime, requires a power law of institutions of prevention, investigation, dispute resolution, prosecution, restitution, punishment and prevention.

    In order to produce a market requires a pareto distribution of assets, so that the organization of networks in an market can produce a complex division of labor and its returns without which the terms freedom and liberty have no meaning.

    In order to produce a society that tolerates market competition and the suppression of free riding, parasitism, fraud, crime, and organized crime, requires the resulting distribution of rewards satisfy a marginal nash equilibrium.

    Given three possible means of coercion: force-defense (Military-police, government), trade-boycott(commerce-law), and advocacy+insurance-undermining+ostracization(social,education,religion), elites will combine to use and misuse these skills in a competition.

    Given that Man varies greatly from barely human to superhuman in physical, social, and intellectual ability, and sexual, social, economic, political, and military value, and given the power, pareto, and nash necessities of distributions, man will sort by value to others by his value in those markets – producing networks of competing and overlapping hierarchies that we call sexual, social, economic, and political class.

    As such, rule of law and the independent judiciary provide a market for the suppression of not only individuals and groups of individuals, but elites in all three dimensions of elites, such that sovereignty, liberty and freedom are maintained DESPITE the presence of necessary hierarchies.

    So I consider bakunin like all other idiots as immature, adolescent, vain and ignorant consequences of the industrial revolution and the disregard for the hierarchies in elites of all resulted, and the that these vain, ignorant, immature, adolescent minds gave fertile soil for the false promise of pseudosciences and sophisms of the anti european sense making, and anti-european marxism, neo-marxism, neo-conservatism, libertarianism, postmodernism, feminism, and hbd-denial of the foundations of western civlization: that we used markets in everything to defeat regression to the mean by suppressing the reproduction of those that lacked ability to compete in the markets in the service of others.

    In other words, I view these well meaning fools as useful idiots in the destruction of western civlization.

    Which is how I pretty much view everyone. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 22:07:00 UTC

  • WE ARE TRYING TO ARTICULATE “NATIONAL COMMONS-ISM” by Luke Weinhagen I have a su

    WE ARE TRYING TO ARTICULATE “NATIONAL COMMONS-ISM”

    by Luke Weinhagen

    I have a suspicion that what many are grasping at within NatSoc is not a socialization of the economy but rather a commonization (not communization) of the government.

    This is what the west was aimed at solving but without full-accounting under P’s complete description of property, government became just another marketable commodity under globalist capitalism.

    What we are really trying to articulate is a form of National Commonsism.

    The resistance to “socializing” any part of our civic under our current model of “governance as commodity” is it effectively means selling whatever was socialized to big interest and international agents. There is no trust.

    National Commonsism == Kinship Capitalism == reciprocity protected by full-accounting



    CD: Always count on luke for genius.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 10:53:00 UTC

  • Three Podcasts coming: 1) E0006 – On Reciprocity, The Natural Law, Rule, Governm

    Three Podcasts coming:

    1) E0006 – On Reciprocity, The Natural Law, Rule, Government, and Commons

    2) E0007 – Crossing the Chasm and the Choice

    3) E0008 – On The Past, Present, and Future of Marriage

    then

    N) E000N – The Introduction to the Constitution

    Now if someone can just bind and gag the little old lady long enough that I can edit them … lol.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 10:46:00 UTC

  • TRANSFORMATION OF WAR (4GW) —“The most important book written about military t

    https://www.amazon.com/Transformation-War-Martin-Van-Creveld-ebook/dp/B002YFC1ISTHE TRANSFORMATION OF WAR (4GW)

    —“The most important book written about military theory since Clausewitz. I am the “give peace a chance” antiwar generation. This book completely changed my view on war and soldiers. I found it indispensable when I was teaching High School students the _Iliad_: Agamemnon forgets than no one will die for the interests of another. Odysseus forgets than no one will die for his _own_ interests. Achilles forgets that the “I” must become a “we”. Chapters 5 & 6 “What War Is Fought For” and “Why War is Fought”, respectively, were written in Paradise.

    “Transformed war”, what Van Creveld calls “non-trinitarian war”, is now with us. William Lind calls it “Fourth Generation War”. Van Creveld’s book is the original and best study of this kind of war, done magisterially in his last chapter.

    This book, and Van Creveld’s Rise and Decline of The State are essential reading. Both books changed my life.”—

    https://www.amazon.com/Transformation-War-Martin-Van-Creveld-ebook/dp/B002YFC1ISUpdated Apr 27, 2020, 9:31 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 09:31:00 UTC

  • CONTROL VOTING AS INVESTMENT IN STATE CONTROL (via Joel Davis)Updated Apr 27, 20

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investment_theory_of_party_competition?fbclid=IwAR3BK5jF37EXqv6jlwTrAdIt3yNQ863QTX0ZCieKCh60Q9_XQ6d3K0uah88ELITES CONTROL VOTING AS INVESTMENT IN STATE CONTROL

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investment_theory_of_party_competition?

    (via Joel Davis)Updated Apr 27, 2020, 7:49 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 07:49:00 UTC

  • oh no they won’t do the right thing. They’ll do the wrong thing and get hung for

    oh no they won’t do the right thing. They’ll do the wrong thing and get hung for it until we discover the equilibrium of sufficient hanging. 😉 I suspect that’s a synonom for ‘frequently’


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 00:13:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1254564237323710466

    Reply addressees: @dormant511 @EricLiford @ekiekipatang

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1254563867256074240

  • I haven’t talked to john about this, but I think he was making the point that fo

    I haven’t talked to john about this, but I think he was making the point that for those states that don’t want contagion from blue states that they won’t grant local voting rights to those that move.

    In that context I don’t understand your question. Why should it matter?


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-26 22:59:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1254545633052147713

    Reply addressees: @Bskin17

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1254542255857168385

  • Like Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, Communism promised a universal government

    Like Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, Communism promised a universal government of the underclasses.The french invented pre-communist european state socialism, Italians post-communist intolerant State socialism in Fascism. Via the French, we forced the Germans into ACTING on it.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-26 20:57:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1254514879018471426

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1254513730970365952


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @EricLiford Nat’l Fascism was increase in Napoleon’s pre-industrial State and Military Total War, to post-industrial State, Military, Economic, Culture, and informational Total War against International Political,Economic, Cultural and informational extra-state total war of Jewish Communism.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1254513730970365952

  • Nat’l Fascism was increase in Napoleon’s pre-industrial State and Military Total

    Nat’l Fascism was increase in Napoleon’s pre-industrial State and Military Total War, to post-industrial State, Military, Economic, Culture, and informational Total War against International Political,Economic, Cultural and informational extra-state total war of Jewish Communism.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-26 20:52:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1254513730970365952

    Reply addressees: @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1254503830273830912

  • UNDERSTANDING FASCISM IN CONTEXT Nat’l Fascism was expansion of Napoleon’s Pre-I

    UNDERSTANDING FASCISM IN CONTEXT

    Nat’l Fascism was expansion of Napoleon’s Pre-Industrial State and Military Total War, to post-industrial State, Military, Economic, Culture, and informational Total War against International Political,Economic, Cultural and informational extra-state total war of Jewish Communism.

    Like Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, Communism promised a universal government of the underclasses.The french invented pre-communist european state socialism, Italians post-communist intolerant State socialism in Fascism. Via the French, we forced the Germans into ACTING on it.

    Napoleon……………..Fascism……………….Communism

    Civilizational……………National……………….International

    … Total War…………… Total War……………..Total War

    … … Pre-industrial….. …Post-Industrial…… Post Ind.

    … … State……………… …State………………….Extra-State

    … … Military…………… …Military……………………………….

    … … ……………………… …Economic…………..Economic

    … … ……………………… …Cultural………………Cultural

    … … ……………………… …Informational………Informational

    … … ……………………… …Political……………..Political

    … … ……………………… ……………………………Revolutionary

    … … External Offense….Internal Defense….Internal Revolt.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-26 18:53:00 UTC