Curt Doolittle

Theme: Ethnoculture

  • ANOTHER ANTI-WHITE MYTH BITES THE DUST: –“Europeans were dark-skinned until 8,0

    ANOTHER ANTI-WHITE MYTH BITES THE DUST:

    –“Europeans were dark-skinned until 8,000 years ago: Pale complexions were brought to Europe from the Near East, study claims”—

    Another lie by pilpul.

    (a) Primates are white. Proto-humans developed dark skin when hair (fur) thinned to allow us greater heat dissipation. Black skin is an adaptation. And it varies all over africa. When we spread out of heavy-uv climates, wore clothes and needed vitamin D, we started losing that dark skin adaptation. The ‘out of africa region’ of Africa (Ethiopia, Yemen) started losing it too because of back migration from Eurasia.

    (b) People of the middle east are largely basal eurasian – the first people out of Africa. They have no north Eurasian ancestry.

    (c) European post-glacial hunter-gatherers have little to do with modern Europeans. Those people are extinct. They lived in Europe. Europeans carry some of their genes, from having killed the men and enslaved and reproduced with the women.

    (d) Those peoples living in SOUTHERN Europe 8,000 years ago (western, Scandinavian, and eastern hunter-gathers) were already admixed with ANE – Ancient North Eurasians (whites) to some degree. So they had ‘lightness’.

    (e) At approximately the same time, people living in Sweden had both light skin gene variants, SLC24A5 and SLC45A2. They also had a third gene, HERC2/OCA2, which causes blue eyes and may also contribute to light skin and blond hair.

    (f) Early Neolithic Farmers: Those people with semi-white skin migrating from Anatolia were 50% ancient north Eurasians. (white).

    (g) Europeans (whites) arrived in (invaded) Europe starting 5000 years ago. Those people were more than 50% ancient north Eurasian, Eastern European Hunter-Gatherer. They had evolved in cooperation with or competition with the Iranic peoples who (at the time) were also 50% ancient north Eurasian.

    (h) Ancient North Eurasians (24k ybp) spread rapidly (like the Aryans did later) in a cline from north Eurasia (northern Russia), to Europe (easter, western, Scandinavian, and south european hunter-gatherers). They heavily affected the first immigrants to the Americas, and less so the Asians.

    (i) Present Europeans are almost exclusively the result of admixture between western hunter-gatherers, neolithic farmers, and (white) steppe herders (SH), who are all descendants of ancient north Eurasians.

    (j) my suspicion is that steppe and tundra life is extremely difficult physically, socially, and psychologically, limiting populations, but it has a very low disease gradient, and it’s relatively easy to obtain food, so it’s a very good cauldron to cook evolution. Africa and the Levant (dry, high disease gradient), north Eurasia (cold steppe, tundra, forest), european (mild weather forests and rivers), SE Asia (hot monsoon weather forests), and the south pacific (islands) are very different environments.

    The clock is ticking and the truth will soon be unavoidable.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-21 20:54:00 UTC

  • Excerpt…. (and after this, wait till you see my most recent work explaining th

    Excerpt…. (and after this, wait till you see my most recent work explaining the evolution of european civilization’s group strategy and metaphysics. I finally found a way to talk about it and get the point across easily.)

    ===

    4 – Any group that institutionalizes neotenic evolution (eugenics) will benefit from the fact that eugenics are the single most influential and desirable factor determining group quality of material life. Dysgenics are the single most desirable factor opposing material life in exchange for psychological life. Markets are naturally eugenic. Religion is the opposite. And serves largely to sedate us against evolutionary pressures as populations increase and with it, anonymity, irrelevance, and alienation.

    5 – Europeans, for entirely environmental reasons, were the only people to develop Law – meaning the natural law of tort (consisting of self-determination, sovereignty, property, and reciprocity) as their first social and political institution, instead of religion or state. And the law is a purely empirical means of social organization. As we shall see, the order of institutional development like any evolutionary process creates evolutionary dependencies, that determine the future of civilizations. (See: Path Dependence) Law is the least evolutionarily contradictory political institution. Just as commerce is the least evolutionarily contradictory social order. Just as the Military is the least evolutionarily contradictory extra-political order. Just as science (Testimony) is the least evolutionarily contradictory intellectual order.

    6 – Europeans, and specifically European aristocratic (Ruling) classes, for those entirely environmental reasons, and having developed empirical law as their first institution, were alone the only people to discover, adapt to, and apply the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe. Despite the extraordinary high psychological cost of doing so. And the one cost East Asians would also bear: the suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses and the direction of the surpluses to the production of commons. And in doing so dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, early mortality, in just a few centuries in the early bronze age, a few centuries in the ancient world, and a few centuries in the modern world – while the middle east stagnated then declined in dysgenia, the Indians were unable to transform the continent, the Chinese, luckily isolated from the middle east succeeded then stagnated, leaving Europeans as the only people to succeed in the transition out of victimization by nature, and the universe, and instead to domesticate it.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-21 10:32:00 UTC

  • The Solution to The Great Sort of The 21 St Century?

    The Solution to The Great Sort of The 21 St Century? https://t.co/JLsgo3tsCO

  • The Solution to The Great Sort of The 21 St Century?

    The Solution to The Great Sort of The 21 St Century? https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/09/20/the-solution-to-the-great-sort-of-the-21-st-century/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-09-20 01:51:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1307497553815121927

  • The Solution to The Great Sort of The 21 St Century?

    THE SOLUTION TO THE GREAT SORT OF THE 21ST CENTURY? The future increase in selection pressure by intelligence is not a hard problem to solve at all. 1 – Groups divide by kinship interest, 2 – Elites for each group compete for and evolve their group. 3 – Limit bottom reproduction until marginal differences between groups are eliminated. What’s the worst? Collecting the brightest in one polity thereby leaving all other polities behind, while fomenting conflict in that polity. What’s worst of all? Fomenting that conflict in the only laboring, working, lower-middle, and middle-class population that has developed high trust and truth-before-face, upon which the entire meritocratic edifice that gives the opportunity to those diverse elites is constructed – thereby ensuring the destruction of the high trust polity and return of kinship interest above all. The world is not complex. If it seems so it is the lies used to circumvent the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws; the lies used to circumvent that only Europeans discovered, applied, and adapted to them; and in doing so dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, and disease; and that the world hates Europeans for doing so, and casts Europeans as oppressors as a proxy for nature and natures’ god, for most adapting to those physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. That is the reason for european exceptionalism. And the world shudders and does everything possible to deny it. So what is the real problem? By inventing the age of sail in response to the Muslim conquest of Byzantium, and spreading around the world, Europeans reunited mankind, sought to bring them to their level of adaptation to physical natural and evolutionary laws – and the world it seems, cannot adapt and do so. And so by the middle of this century, just as the european colonial project failed, the Jewish cosmopolitan project in all its Marxist, postmodernist, feminist forms, will fail, and we will end the costly failed experiment, and return to a conflict of civilizations, led by core states, advancing kinship interests, cooperating by trade, in a world where we must once again develop civilizational trade routes to survive, which will place us once again into military conflict over the returns on those routes. In other words, a return to normal, and a return to speciation, especially speciation by intelligence – just as we have always speciated. And the chance that I err herein approaches zero.

  • The Solution to The Great Sort of The 21 St Century?

    THE SOLUTION TO THE GREAT SORT OF THE 21ST CENTURY? The future increase in selection pressure by intelligence is not a hard problem to solve at all. 1 – Groups divide by kinship interest, 2 – Elites for each group compete for and evolve their group. 3 – Limit bottom reproduction until marginal differences between groups are eliminated. What’s the worst? Collecting the brightest in one polity thereby leaving all other polities behind, while fomenting conflict in that polity. What’s worst of all? Fomenting that conflict in the only laboring, working, lower-middle, and middle-class population that has developed high trust and truth-before-face, upon which the entire meritocratic edifice that gives the opportunity to those diverse elites is constructed – thereby ensuring the destruction of the high trust polity and return of kinship interest above all. The world is not complex. If it seems so it is the lies used to circumvent the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws; the lies used to circumvent that only Europeans discovered, applied, and adapted to them; and in doing so dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, hard labor, poverty, starvation, and disease; and that the world hates Europeans for doing so, and casts Europeans as oppressors as a proxy for nature and natures’ god, for most adapting to those physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. That is the reason for european exceptionalism. And the world shudders and does everything possible to deny it. So what is the real problem? By inventing the age of sail in response to the Muslim conquest of Byzantium, and spreading around the world, Europeans reunited mankind, sought to bring them to their level of adaptation to physical natural and evolutionary laws – and the world it seems, cannot adapt and do so. And so by the middle of this century, just as the european colonial project failed, the Jewish cosmopolitan project in all its Marxist, postmodernist, feminist forms, will fail, and we will end the costly failed experiment, and return to a conflict of civilizations, led by core states, advancing kinship interests, cooperating by trade, in a world where we must once again develop civilizational trade routes to survive, which will place us once again into military conflict over the returns on those routes. In other words, a return to normal, and a return to speciation, especially speciation by intelligence – just as we have always speciated. And the chance that I err herein approaches zero.

  • That’s the demarcation between European and Semitic civilization. A Semitic reli

    That’s the demarcation between European and Semitic civilization. A Semitic religion of the primacy of god versus a European religion of the primacy of man. It’s not like you have a choice in the matter, or if it’s an opinion. Jews made and brought Christianity into the empire with the primacy of god over the primacy of man. Now, given the behavior of Nero et all at the time it made sense. That does not alter the fact that jews used the primacy of God and the primacy of THEIR god, as a means of denying the primacy of man, and the primacy of reality, and the joy of life in reality practiced by European man, rather than the hatred of life in the present and promise of joy in the afterlife of the jews. Everything was done in order to justify and provide incentives. Everything is explicable in natural law. Man lies to claim moral his strategy. It’s not complicated.

  • That’s the demarcation between European and Semitic civilization. A Semitic reli

    That’s the demarcation between European and Semitic civilization. A Semitic religion of the primacy of god versus a European religion of the primacy of man. It’s not like you have a choice in the matter, or if it’s an opinion. Jews made and brought Christianity into the empire with the primacy of god over the primacy of man. Now, given the behavior of Nero et all at the time it made sense. That does not alter the fact that jews used the primacy of God and the primacy of THEIR god, as a means of denying the primacy of man, and the primacy of reality, and the joy of life in reality practiced by European man, rather than the hatred of life in the present and promise of joy in the afterlife of the jews. Everything was done in order to justify and provide incentives. Everything is explicable in natural law. Man lies to claim moral his strategy. It’s not complicated.

  • Our Position on USA, Race, and Government

    P-LAW IS FOR EVERYONE (from Twitter) OUR POSITION ON USA, RACE, AND GOVERNMENT While there are minor physical differences, the only material POLITICAL difference between the races is the historical geographic pressure on the group’s underclass and its resulting size relative to the middle class. This ratio determines the group’s success of pareto-organization (hierarchy) of an economy that can compete in the world market. But people demonstrate ingroup priority in politics and all life: marriage, neighborhood, generating different political demands. Whites and Asians demographic distributions are more successful in advanced market civilizations dependent on individual productivity using written communication, logic, calculation, protocols, machines, and technology. Therefore people with different demographic distributions require different economic structures and costs to those economic structures, and they can’t politically mix without conflict since the needs of a population 4–50% able to compete in market civ and one that 80-90% can, are polar opposites. And burning your own consumption and reproduction in favor of political competitors makes people angry (Very). Add to that the uncomfortable truth that sexual, social, economic, and political market value is determined by the degree of neoteny AND demographic distribution, and you end up with the predictable hierarchy of races and subraces that is evident across the world. Therefore while the USA is a continental empire, we are better off with the original design of the country, as an imitation of Historical Europe, with a lot of small states each customizing the production of state services for people with common needs and common interests, and cooperating by the markets rather than perpetual conflict in politics. We can still maintain the services of the federal (continental) government by in-state, military, treasury, benefits, and dispute between states, but devolve the federal government from creating a ‘globalist’ order here in the states with the same resulting conflict as worldwide. This will end the political conflict and drastically reduce power distance between the people and the government. It will generate harmony, It will allow every possible mixture of people and ever possible political model, and states will compete to sere people, but still live within their economic means.

  • Our Position on USA, Race, and Government

    P-LAW IS FOR EVERYONE (from Twitter) OUR POSITION ON USA, RACE, AND GOVERNMENT While there are minor physical differences, the only material POLITICAL difference between the races is the historical geographic pressure on the group’s underclass and its resulting size relative to the middle class. This ratio determines the group’s success of pareto-organization (hierarchy) of an economy that can compete in the world market. But people demonstrate ingroup priority in politics and all life: marriage, neighborhood, generating different political demands. Whites and Asians demographic distributions are more successful in advanced market civilizations dependent on individual productivity using written communication, logic, calculation, protocols, machines, and technology. Therefore people with different demographic distributions require different economic structures and costs to those economic structures, and they can’t politically mix without conflict since the needs of a population 4–50% able to compete in market civ and one that 80-90% can, are polar opposites. And burning your own consumption and reproduction in favor of political competitors makes people angry (Very). Add to that the uncomfortable truth that sexual, social, economic, and political market value is determined by the degree of neoteny AND demographic distribution, and you end up with the predictable hierarchy of races and subraces that is evident across the world. Therefore while the USA is a continental empire, we are better off with the original design of the country, as an imitation of Historical Europe, with a lot of small states each customizing the production of state services for people with common needs and common interests, and cooperating by the markets rather than perpetual conflict in politics. We can still maintain the services of the federal (continental) government by in-state, military, treasury, benefits, and dispute between states, but devolve the federal government from creating a ‘globalist’ order here in the states with the same resulting conflict as worldwide. This will end the political conflict and drastically reduce power distance between the people and the government. It will generate harmony, It will allow every possible mixture of people and ever possible political model, and states will compete to sere people, but still live within their economic means.