Theme: Ethnoculture

It’s because the IQ increase doesn’t come from genetic origins or jewish religion, but from european admixture, and using judiasm and separatism, computational specialization, and aggressive upward redistribution of reproduction. The difference between north european cognitive elites (Tories) at 113 and european jews at 112 isn’t meaningful. What’s meaningful is that european jews produce twice as many outliers over 140? Why? The same cause that produces the range of neurological diseases in the Ashkenazi produces increased development of specific neurons and white matter. So the point I want to make in this post and the others I’m working on, is that there are limits to each biological channel humans have taken advantage of in order to develop our hyper adaptability. While there is probably some limit to human cognitive ability, and it’s probably what we consider in the 200’s or 300’s ( Terrance Tao is probably 220-230 and has no apparent defects (like say Chomsky)). His development is due to neotenic excellence we see in east Asia, and not to mutation (as we see in the Ashkenazim). In other words, Europeans have developed sufficient neoteny for cognitive excellence and adapted neotenic signaling without sexual neoteny (like east Asians). Europeans have cut the bottom, and increased metabolic ability, more than developed mutations. East Asians are demonstrating the value of neoteny at the cost of sexual expression (with obvious consequences we don’t talk about). So what’s left? isolating cognitive neoteny (developmental extension of early neurological development) and improving our means of computation (system of measurement and communication).