Your leftist anti-science is tedious, false, and harmful to mankind.
Aristotle was not alone in discussing the races. And his advice to alexander was to treat the other races as other herd animals. Races have been discussed throughout all of history. And with the same degree of disgust directed to the same peoples for the same reasons.
What we began to understand in the age of discovery was that all humans evolved from only three base races: Africans, Asians, and west-Eurasians. This is the only innovation in the understanding of races of the modern age. Recently we have settled the debate about the pacific island mixes which consist of blending of African (Negroid), Asian (Mongoloid), and Caucasian(Caucusoid) in a cline from coastal Indian in the north and west to Australia and new guinea in the south and east.
Like all other creatures, humans were speciating (adapting to local environments) with the majority of changes developing very rapidly and along expected axis according to caloric intake (height), disease gradient (rapid maturity), cold climate close proximity (neoteny), along lines of sexual dimorphism, producing minor differences in cognitive priority (east Asian, white, afro-Asiatic, African.) Human variation is rather simple along these regulatory adaptations and does not require mutation, only selection. Light skin is simply neotenic. Primates have white skin and develop black skin when they lose hair in equilibrium between D-absorption and UV protection. White skin wasn’t so much an invention as a reversal given the reproductive desirability of neoteny (overextended in east Asians). This neoteny is the reason for the hierarchy of sexual market value of the races even though it can be taken to the point of negative consequences in both directions (east Asian males vs African males, and African females vs east Asian females, with west Eurasians of various distributions in between.)
Whites (Caucasians) are the newest race (subspecies), developing in only the past 16k or fewer years from an admixture of west Eurasian genetics along the ice age limits.
The greatest and most recent genetic changes occurred in East Asia and Europe since both peoples practiced various forms of pre-agrarian, and agrarian eugenics – reaching a maximum expression in Europe after 700 with manorialism(delayed reproduction), monogamy, nuclear family, and the prohibition on in and near-breeding – and followed by post-1000 aggressive use of capital punishment (hanging in particular) eradicating one half to two percent of every generation. This left 20% of people not reproducing at all, the bottom 3% eradicated (the usual genetic failure rate), and decreased reproduction of people in the lower third (bottom). And this is the origin of eastern and western IQ and behavioral advantage: eugenic decrease in the underclass population, genetic expansion of the genetic middle class, and the possibility of directing surplusses to the production of high-return commons
Man was not oppressed. He was a violent, pragmatic, hyperconsumptive, hyperreproductive, ecologically devastating, superpredator, that was incrementally domesticated by taking over the dominance hierarchy like every other animal and regulating his behavior and reproduction, and that domestication was judge by selection for increasing participation in a productive division of labor.
Man domesticated females, then each other, then animals, then plants, and then every aspect of the universe he can manage. And Europeans who by accident developed the only kindred and corporate, technological and empirical, under realism and naturalism, and as a result the institution of law before religion or state, are responsible for 98% of the innovations that dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the continuous victimization by a natural world all but hostile to human life, in just a few hundred years of the IE expansion, a few years in the Mediterranean era, and a few years in the north sea (Atlantic) era.
Every other civlization failed to discover, adapt to, and apply the physical natural and evolutionary laws of the universe. But this european civilization is costly. That cost cannot be born by the uncompetitive (dygenic). And the uncompetitive (dysgenic) absorb all productivity prohibiting investment in the commons that continuosuly keep man ahead of the evolutionary red queen. Everyother civliztion reached the point of failure of their strategy. Every other civlization did so becuase they developed either no institutions, or religion first, or state first, and not law first, when only law produces markets in evver aspect ofl ife, and the continuous calculation of defeat of entropy we call evolution.
No more leftist (Marxist, neo-Marxist, Postmodern) science-denial, and no more lies.
The foundation of leftists lies – the false promises:
1 – there is no existentially possible end to scarcity.
2 – the nature of man is amoral (pragmatic) and maximizes immorality (discounts) at all times.
3 – the nature of man is immutable – all we can do is alter incentives to act in rational self-interest.
These are false and impossible promises of freedom of physical (scarcity), natural (reciprocity), and evolutionary (regression to the mean) laws.
No more lies.
We lost 1000 years because of Xianity.
We lost 1B to Islam.
We lost five great civilizations to Islam.
We lost 100M to communism.
We lost south America to socialism
We have lost the west to postmodernism.
And we cannot rescue the middle east from Islam.
And China alone is empirically realist. (oddly).
No more lies.
No more leftist lies.
We do not have an infinite amount of time to pass the great filter.
And the most likely great filter is the failure to continue natural selection by market eugenics.
Source date (UTC): 2020-09-19 19:56:00 UTC
P-Law criminalizes behavior that every immigrant class (and our own) practice. P-constitutional amendments articulate our natural rights and our european strategy in purely scientific terms. Are you saying that you have a solution to this problem other than murdering people who don’t agree with you on whatever you’re complaining about? Are you saying that women have a choice in their biases? Are you saying that any given ethnic group as a choice in its biases, habits, traditions, culture, strategy? Are you saying you have a choice?