Theme: Education

  • NEED FOR A VIDEO EXPLAINING P TO SCHOOL AGE AUDIENCE. To: John Mark (P-Teachers)

    NEED FOR A VIDEO EXPLAINING P TO SCHOOL AGE AUDIENCE.

    To: John Mark (P-Teachers)

    Just rec’d a phone call on at the Institute asking for a john mark style video targeted to home school, middle school, and high schoolers who are exasperated by the current climate and are looking for answers.

    I explained that yes, most talk is radical because that is how all reform movements begin: at the fringes with people who are very angry, and they slowly ‘domesticate’ as they evolve into more mainstream acceptance where people are merely frustrated.

    I think that if we were to state the problems we’re trying to solve in simple terms: de-deception, de-politicization, de-financialization, de-‘individualism’, and re-familialism, the restoration of reciprocity, and restoration of local control over manner, norm, custom, and tradition – at the cost of restoring voluntary disassociation (city-states, and county-states), that we might be able to reach this demographic … and I was wondering if that isn’t the way to reach the majority.

    I might take a cut at it but I don’t want to do much before getting thoughts.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 14:12:00 UTC

  • Disagreeableness. 😉 (diary) I treated college as a purely commercial exercise a

    Disagreeableness. 😉
    (diary)

    I treated college as a purely commercial exercise and couldn’t have cared less about grades, homework, professors’ opinions, or anything other than whether I was… https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=489926048270957&id=100017606988153


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-22 01:48:50 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186459363537498112

  • Disagreeableness. 😉 (diary) I treated college as a purely commercial exercise a

    Disagreeableness. 😉

    (diary)

    I treated college as a purely commercial exercise and couldn’t have cared less about grades, homework, professors’ opinions, or anything other than whether I was learning something I thought was interesting and valuable. I loved my education in the arts. I still do. its precious to me. I loved contract law. I found political science immoral. I found engineering obvious and tedious. And my only major mistake was not moving into literature when the department asked me. If I’d taken philosophy and literature I would have excelled more so than in the arts – where my primary concern was technique theory and history. I never had any intention of doing anything other than running a business. Education was purely ‘for me’. But I might have had a very different life if someone had said “you know, when a department asks you to join you don’t say no unless you have a very good reason”. I didn’t have a reason to say no. I loved college. I only realized much later that my health problems started early – probably when I got that damned flu. I kept take classes in something or other until the dot com era, where it was simply too impossible to make time. Founding Ascentium was just a dead heat from day one and between that and health I didn’t have anything left. I was pretty ill I think by the time I left college. I just didn’t feel right. And so began a lifetime of doctors without letting anyone know I was having health problems because it’s damaging to your career. That said, founded or built one company after another until illness convinced me that it was do or die so to speak, and that if I didn’t start working full time on it I wouldn’t have time for it.

    What’s the lesson here? I dunno. i certainly wouldn’t have taken the AI->Law -> Hayek->Popper -> economics route if I’d done it otherwise, so it’s a choice between two worlds one of which exists and one of which is only imagined.

    Best advice from an older family member: “You never want to be forty and say ‘I wish I had….’. I took it. I didn’t. I don’t. Not because this path has been other than fulfilling, but that I simply wonder what that other path might have led to. I think I might have been a lot happier in some ways and not in others.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 21:48:00 UTC

  • 7) … including education, academy, media, state, financial, commercial, advert

    7) … including education, academy, media, state, financial, commercial, advertising, sectors, and prohibits any religion violating natural law and christian ethics (both of which are scientifically stated). Meaning that anyone attempting to undermine western civ is liable.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 21:06:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186388306772275200

    Reply addressees: @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1186387859454021632


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays 6) Part 5 above eradicates pseudoscience-innumeracy, sophism-idealism, and supernaturalism-occult, and in particular the Abrahamic technique of Undermining civilization used in Marxism(class), Feminism(gender), Postmodernism(identity), and denialism(truth) in public speech…

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1186387859454021632


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @directdemocrac7 @JohnMarkSays 6) Part 5 above eradicates pseudoscience-innumeracy, sophism-idealism, and supernaturalism-occult, and in particular the Abrahamic technique of Undermining civilization used in Marxism(class), Feminism(gender), Postmodernism(identity), and denialism(truth) in public speech…

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1186387859454021632

  • NO YOU DON”T HAVE WRITER’S BLOCK – HOW TO WRITE You can’t write from a feeling –

    NO YOU DON”T HAVE WRITER’S BLOCK – HOW TO WRITE

    You can’t write from a feeling – you can’t maintain it. You can’t write from inspiration – it will dissipate.

    OR….

    You can identify a question or a problem, or an argument (persuasion), and write a record of your exploration of it. You can identify a theory, and write your character’s investigation of it. You can identify a strategy given the history of “the technology of storytelling using archetypes, fundamental invariant human experiences, plot combinations, points of view (narrator, first, second), and past present and future contexts, to create a novelty, or an adaptation, revisiting the human experience to make an observation relevant to the day or era.” You can maintain your interests and attention mentally and emotionally.

    If you’re just writing from feeling or inspiration, thats why you’re failing yourself and your audience, because since you aren’t learning anything – neither are they. You have have something interesting in your head to write something interesting. The propensity to imagine is a talent, but writing is a craft like any other.

    Never confuse writing with therapy, nor work with avoidance, nor art with entertainment, nor sex with masturbation.

    Unless you’re being taught writing by the upper .01% you’re wasting your time. Writing is another form of engineering raised to an art. You can’t create an art without learning the science (engineering), the craft (practice) and the art (innovation).

    It’s not worth talented people’s time to help you find therapy, entertainment, or self gratification.

    My first ‘tough love’ review in art school was the question ‘why are you making art?’ I foolishly said “because it is fun” (meaning therapeutic). The response was “let me know when it’s work. bEcause then you’re learning, then you might have something to say. Until you’re working and working hard, you’re wasting our time, your time, and the audience’s time.”

    You can’t get a good education in the arts today. It’s just not possible. Even at Yale. Maybe CCAC. It’s almost impossible to get a good education today. You are a customer whose satisfaction is to be earned with the least conflict, not a student who the teachers and professors bear the burden to transforming into an innovator or aesthete.

    So you have to educate yourself, or find a group of mentors for whom your potential is worth their investment.

    Writers block doesn’t exist.

    A head empty of ideas because it’s not full of opportunities for free association exists.

    Creativity is not magic. It’s a discipline.

    Fill the shelves of your mind with related material.

    Go do something playful that doesn’t require you refill those shelves with something else.

    Take a shower. Go for a drive. Go for a walk. Go shopping. Anything that’s pleasingly stimulating for your senses but doesn’t occupy your brain.

    The answer will come to you when your bundles of neurons are done with their process of auto association.

    The brain accumulates novelties.

    So go research something somehow related to the characters or context or plot – and fill the shelves of your mind so it can use free association (auto-association) to identify and create novelties.

    If you’re sitting in a chair you’re just wasting your time.

    If you’re out and about and engaged in social activities, or any form of entertainment you’re wasting your time.

    Gather, observe people (what I do), Listen to people, play, exercise, relax, contemplate, and then try.

    If not, then repeat until it works.

    If you are exhausted by the topic start another one on a different topic. Doing so will cause you to auto-associate with your last topic or tory.

    There is nothing magic to this process.

    It’s just training yourself to insulate your five faculties from one another: senses, emotions, intuitions, reason, and actions, so that you use only use the one you need in the moment.

    For creativity you need your intuition: free association.

    Most memories are time and location dependent. Memories are saved by replaying three or more sequential episodes. When they are replaying (below your conscious threshold) they are auto-associating, and with every replay the breadth of auto association increases because neural connections increase. you are trying to let auto association not THINKING do the work for you until you find an idea. Then you think how to move your character or plot or argument from here to there.

    Creativity is just a discipline like meditation or stoicism or studying – a means of training your brain to delivery what your mind wants from it. Creative people just want novelty more than those less creative. They’re novelty junkies. But novelty requires new material to cause auto association. When I teach people anything from storytelling, to argument, to engineering, to web design to system architecture I say the same thing: go do some research on what others have done. you aren’t smarter or more creative than anyone else. You’re either identifying an opportunity to attract audience attention, and filling your mind with tools of auto-association, or you’re living under the illusion that you have some magic talent. You don’t ARt is just the generation of novelty in the craft you are experimenting upon by narrative, composition (aesthetics), materials, or technique. It doesn’t matter what art we talk about.

    A brain is a very big but very simple thing that does just one thing: It performs free (auto) associations until something is interesting enough to raise to your attention.

    You just have to train your mind to let your brain do its work.

    And then think (work) at getting from where you are to where you want to be given that interesting idea.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-21 13:30:00 UTC

  • Combine with Infantilization of males in education, the lower testosterone of lo

    Combine with Infantilization of males in education, the lower testosterone of lower middle and upper proletarian classes, and indoctrination into pseudoscience,sophism and denialism in the university and we see this kind of behavior from women, and pseudo-males defend them.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-19 17:00:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185601619129458689

    Reply addressees: @renewmeme @jim_rutt

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185601166270500871


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @renewmeme @jim_rutt What hurt? I agree with the OP. About a third of women are mentally ill – that’s the real reason we closed the asylums: they were full of women. Whereas the extreme male manifests in autism, the extreme female manifests is psychosis.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1185601166270500871


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @renewmeme @jim_rutt What hurt? I agree with the OP. About a third of women are mentally ill – that’s the real reason we closed the asylums: they were full of women. Whereas the extreme male manifests in autism, the extreme female manifests is psychosis.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1185601166270500871

  • WRITING NONFICTION BOOKS It’s very unlikely you can write a book. It’s likely yo

    WRITING NONFICTION BOOKS

    It’s very unlikely you can write a book. It’s likely you can write a paper. Its likely if you can write a series of papers that you can combine them into a book. Most of the time a paper is sufficient for a book. A book merely provides a set of historical examples, or hypothetical examples, that illustrate the sequence of dependencies on the one and and applications on the other.

    So, learn to write arguments (2pp). Then combine arguments into a paper (20pp), then papers into a book (200pp+).

    Most authors write books to document their learning experience. This is different from pretense that you have a problem figured out until you have finished your learning experience, accumulated sets of arguments, sets of papers (arguments in context) and can combine them into a book (narrations of examples past and potential that illustrate each argument and paper).

    There is a reason all libertarian books are introductory. There is a reason all feminist and anti-western authors write in postmodern prose. There is a reason philosophy is written in rationalism rather than the law of reciprocity. So that they can lie. Conversely, there is a reason hard science is written in operational language – so they cannot lie.

    cheers


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-17 15:55:00 UTC

  • “It has not been the devil’s policy to keep the masses of mankind in ignorance;

    —“It has not been the devil’s policy to keep the masses of mankind in ignorance; but finding that they will read, he is doing all in his power to poison their books.”— John Kenneth Galbraith


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-17 01:22:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184640741416558597

  • “It has not been the devil’s policy to keep the masses of mankind in ignorance;

    —“It has not been the devil’s policy to keep the masses of mankind in ignorance; but finding that they will read, he is doing all in his power to poison their books.”— John Kenneth Galbraith


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 21:22:00 UTC

  • Kate: study physics, economics, cognitive science, and developmental biology emp

    Kate: study physics, economics, cognitive science, and developmental biology emphasizing gender and class differences. Then study the differences in mental illness, anti-social behavior, and conflict between men and women instead of philosophy: the language of sophism and deceit.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 22:00:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227512332836864

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227511481389056


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    Men = Material Economics,Physics, Constraint (Reals)
    Women = Emotional Economics, Manipulation, Consumption (feels).
    “M:Stress over failing to advance” versus “F:Fear of being left behind”.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227511481389056


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    Men = Material Economics,Physics, Constraint (Reals)
    Women = Emotional Economics, Manipulation, Consumption (feels).
    “M:Stress over failing to advance” versus “F:Fear of being left behind”.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227511481389056