RT @Outsideness: “… the monastic bubble burst. Now it’s time for the university bubble to burst too.” http://www.unz.com/article/college-bubble-bursting-left-hardest-hit-too-bad/
— Process…
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-07 03:48:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1181053619820531717
Dutton is an academic. He took to youtube when he saw revenue generated by the current activism. His academic work is solid (I know the material.) He’s just making it entertaining.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 12:43:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180825959974486016
Reply addressees: @Mahgraye @Race__Realist @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180535945055080448
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180535945055080448
Change your branding from ‘freedom’ (political) to something different, and move your self help and educational work to it, and stay out of the political. Self help is a revenue generator, and isn’t demonetized. And rebuild your revenue stream by exiting the political discourse.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-06 12:39:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180824922127503360
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180824921091592192
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
Stefan: If you haven’t got the stomach for political or thought leadership, just go the self-help route – you will never run out of customers. Most of your work is reducible to self help or education, not innovation or leadership. And, We shouldn’t ask it of you.
@StefanMolyneux
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180824921091592192
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
Stefan: If you haven’t got the stomach for political or thought leadership, just go the self-help route – you will never run out of customers. Most of your work is reducible to self help or education, not innovation or leadership. And, We shouldn’t ask it of you.
@StefanMolyneux
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180824921091592192
So who are the producers of the propaganda, arts, literature, architecture and schools of the postwar era attempting to create the same destruction of the third great civilization of european peoples? Our law requires Restitution and Prevention.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-05 15:57:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180512411960389637
Reply addressees: @nytopinion
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1180511626426032130
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@nytopinion The new jews we call christians destroyed the arts, literature, architecture, schools, of the ancient world, killed the philosophers who taught in them, and drowned civilization in superstition and ignorance european truth and reason had rescued them from. And we learned from it.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180511626426032130
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@nytopinion The new jews we call christians destroyed the arts, literature, architecture, schools, of the ancient world, killed the philosophers who taught in them, and drowned civilization in superstition and ignorance european truth and reason had rescued them from. And we learned from it.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1180511626426032130
The goal of the education system is not to control your sexual life (thats intellectually dishonest) it’s to insure you do not by your physical, verbal, social, sexual actions, impose costs upon the rest of us. That’s why we have mandatory education. To limit costly extra people.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-04 00:55:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179922999530663937
Reply addressees: @PoseidonAwoke
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178996516775530496
IN REPLY TO:
@PoseidonAwoke
He says: “The ultimate goal of the education system is the control of your sexual life.. If we can determine from an early age how you will behave sexually, we can determine how you will behave. We don’t have to put a gun to your head.”.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1178996516775530496
Why Learn the Grammars? https://propertarianism.com/2019/10/03/why-learn-the-grammars/
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 23:35:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1179902756095692801
[I]f you study math, programming, the physical sciences, economics, or law, you will notice the similarity, in that there are n-number of software design patterns at every level of complexity; n-number of physical laws at every level of complexity; there are n-number of economic ideas at every level of complexity; and n-number of properties of law at contract, jurisprudence, and state authority; and you learn the economic ideas by the association with the author, and the legal ideas by association with a case; the programming ideas by label, example or function, and the mathematic ideas at every increase in dimensions (shapes) by the most absurd archaic nonsense language humanly possible. These different disciplines only ‘seem’ dissimilar or complicated, but they are all reducible to a common paradigm (ontology) and terminology, which once understood is … profoundly enlightening. This is what The Grammars in Propertarianism explain. That there is a regular, obvious pattern to the available operations at every level of complexity, where a level is defined as the set of operations possible before a subsequent operation is possible. In other words, you can’t make a molecule without an element, or an element without an elementary particle, or an elementary particle without the elementary forces. This particular pattern will explain language to you in a way that will explain all languages to you whether that language is one we speak, or one consisting of operations possible in the physical, sentient, and social world.
[I]f you study math, programming, the physical sciences, economics, or law, you will notice the similarity, in that there are n-number of software design patterns at every level of complexity; n-number of physical laws at every level of complexity; there are n-number of economic ideas at every level of complexity; and n-number of properties of law at contract, jurisprudence, and state authority; and you learn the economic ideas by the association with the author, and the legal ideas by association with a case; the programming ideas by label, example or function, and the mathematic ideas at every increase in dimensions (shapes) by the most absurd archaic nonsense language humanly possible. These different disciplines only ‘seem’ dissimilar or complicated, but they are all reducible to a common paradigm (ontology) and terminology, which once understood is … profoundly enlightening. This is what The Grammars in Propertarianism explain. That there is a regular, obvious pattern to the available operations at every level of complexity, where a level is defined as the set of operations possible before a subsequent operation is possible. In other words, you can’t make a molecule without an element, or an element without an elementary particle, or an elementary particle without the elementary forces. This particular pattern will explain language to you in a way that will explain all languages to you whether that language is one we speak, or one consisting of operations possible in the physical, sentient, and social world.
GOAL OF EDUCATION?
(See E Michael Jones)
The goal of the education system is not to control your sexual life (thats intellectually dishonest) it’s to insure you do not by your physical, verbal, social, sexual actions, impose costs upon the rest of us. That’s why we have mandatory education. To limit costly extra people.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-03 21:23:00 UTC
—“Any ‘new right’ must recognize ancient western liberal tradition of ‘noble individualism’ & liberal education, etc. to avoid throwing it out with the bathwater of ‘egalitarian individualism’, which diverted the liberal idea to modern hedonic socialist ends.”— @demontage2000
[Y]es, but those are not terms that can be institutionally enforced. Use instead:
[pullquote] This inflection and the failure to continue eugenics will be seen in history like the failure of the greeks to bring about the industrial revolution.[/pullquote]
That the foundation. There is still more. The right loves the feeling of moral righteousness as much as the left loves outrage. But that is why conservative thinkers failed. We must like the founders, but better than they, create institutions and processes that provide shared incentives, not that require shared belief. The left invented desirable denial, sophism and pseudoscience. The postwar right doubled down on moralizing, b/c they were as afraid of admitting western civ is eugenic as the left was of eugenics. It invalidated democracy as national virtue narrative, in addition to the church. This inflection and the failure to continue eugenics will be seen in history like the failure of the greeks to bring about the industrial revolution. It is the basis for all problems of humanity in the post agrarian era. Vast numbers of people and cultures are detrimental to man.